Objectives: To evaluate prenatal MRI in the diagnosis of fetal thoracic abnormalities and to determine whether MRI provides useful information in addition to that of ultrasonography (US). Methods: Ultrafast MR scanning was performed in 7 pregnant women in whom US was suspicious of fetal congenital anomalies of the thorax [3 cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), 3 cases of chylothorax and 1 case of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM) type III]. The presence, position, size and characteristics of the congenital lesions were determined and compared with postnatal diagnoses. Results: The MRI diagnoses were 3 cases of CDH, 2 of chylothorax and one each of esophageal atresia and CCAM type III. The results of MRI were in agreement with those of US in 6 cases and in disagreement in 1 case of esophageal atresia. Final diagnoses were confirmed at surgery or autopsy in all fetuses. Combined use of MR and US imaging enabled a correct diagnosis in 5 cases and led to an error in the diagnosis of 1 fetus with bronchial stenosis, which had been diagnosed as CCAM type III by US and MRI. MRI led to a correct diagnosis in 1 fetus with esophageal atresia, in whom US had been equivocal in the prenatal diagnosis. Conclusion: MRI helped further characterize the fetal thoracic lesions and confirmed or changed the prenatal diagnosis based on US. MRI seems to be powerful in the prenatal diagnosis of thoracic lesions that are atypical or complicated by multiple abnormalities.

Keywords:
Prenatal diagnosis, Magnetic resonance imaging, Chylothorax, Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Esophageal atresia, Bronchial obstruction
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.