Objective: We aimed to assess whether there is a difference between hydropic and nonhydropic fetuses in the rate of fall of hemoglobin (Hb) following intravascular transfusions. Methods: Eighty-three intravascular transfusions in 34 fetuses were analyzed. The pretransfusion and posttransfusion Hb values, the gestational age, the volume of blood transfused, the number of days between transfusions and the rate of fall of Hb per day following a transfusion were assessed. Hb levels were expressed as multiples of standard deviation from the normal mean for gestational age. Results: Eleven fetuses were hydropic at presentation and 23 were not. Twenty-three transfusions were undertaken in the 11 fetuses while they were hydropic and 60 transfusions were performed in nonhydropic fetuses. Comparisons of transfusion variables between the two groups were performed both for the first transfusion only and also for the total number of transfusions. The rate of Hb fall per day following a transfusion was similar in the two groups on both comparisons. The posttransfusion Hb level tended to be lower and the intervals between transfusions were a little shorter in the hydropic group, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The posttransfusion Hb tended to be lower in the hydropic fetuses, but the fall in Hb was not faster in these cases. Therefore, with a similar rate of daily Hb decline in both groups, the hydropic fetuses are expected to become anemic again sooner than the nonhydropic fetuses only because of the lower posttransfusion Hb. The timing of the next transfusion should therefore be based on the posttransfusion Hb and the normal predicted drop per day irrespective of the presence or absence of hydrops.

Keywords:
Fetal hydrops, Intravascular transfusion, Fetal anemia, Red cell alloimmunization, Hemoglobin fall
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.