Thirty fetuses with Down syndrome, who had detailed fetal echocardiography and sonography at the tertiary center with videotape recordings, were retrospective analyzed by one observer with a specially prepared flow sheet. The mean gestational age of the fetuses at the time of the study was 31 ± 5.6 (minimum 21, maximum 39) weeks. The ‘main’ fetal abnormalities were congenital heart defect (CHD): in 13 cases (43.3%) an abnormal 4-chamber view was recorded, including 6 cases (20%) of isolated CHD and 7 (23.3%) of coexisting CHD + extracardiac malformation. Of the 13 cases of CHD, there were 12 cases of atrio-ventricular canal and 1 case of ventricular septal defect. Normal heart anatomy was recorded in 17 cases (56.7%), including 2 with tricuspid value regurgitation. From the videotape recordings also some ‘minor’ abnormalities were noticed in a few cases such as: femur length shortening; sandal gap; pericardial effusion; macroglossia; echogenic bowel; absent diastolic flow in the umbilical artery, and others. The prevalence of CHD in the study group was similar to the prevalence of CHD in the comparison group of 20 newborns with Down syndrome, born during the same period of time at the same institution, who had not had prenatal scanning at all (χ2, p > 0.05). Conclusions: (1) the main ‘major’ abnormality which might be detected in a fetus with Down syndrome after 20 weeks of pregnancy is CHD, which was presented in 43.3% of this series; (2) the presence of any extracardiac malformation should prompt the sonographer for detailed heart evaluation, and (3) fetal echocardiography may increase the accuracy of ‘genetic sonogram’ in Down syndrome.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.