Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) complain about symptoms such as weak stream, dribbling, intermittency, frequency, nocturia and urgency. To effectively manage these symptoms, it is important to better understand the epidemiology and/or the bothersomeness of these symptoms, the impact of the symptoms on the patient’s quality of life and life style, when and why patients seek medical advice and the subsequent management of LUTS/BPH in clinical practice. This paper gives an overview of these issues considering 3 recently conducted European surveys. Although voiding symptoms are more frequent in patients with LUTS/BPH, storage symptoms, such as frequency, urgency, nocturia and urge incontinence, seem to be more bothersome to the patients. LUTS seem to have a negative impact on the patient’s quality of life and sexuality and to interfere strongly with daily life activities. With regard to sexuality, interference with the patient’s overall sex life and erection problems is experienced as much more bothersome than ejaculation problems. After the initial symptoms, most patients postpone a visit to the physician and try to adjust their life style to self manage their symptoms. Eventually they seek medical advice because they are too much bothered by their LUTS. In Italy, medical therapy is the most frequently administered treatment option by urologists (57% of patients) followed by surgery (37% of patients). α1-Adrenoceptor antagonists are the predominant medical therapy prescribed (70% of all medically treated patients), particularly tamsulosin (35% of all medically treated patients). An interview with European urologists confirms that α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, especially newer uro-selective ones like tamsulosin, are a very appropriate initial treatment choice in the management of both voiding and storage LUTS.

1.
Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ: High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet 1991;338:469–471.
2.
Anderson JB, Roehrborn CG, Schalken JA, Emberton M: The progression of benign prostatic hypeplasia: Examining the evidence and determining the risk. Eur Urol 2001;39:390–399.
3.
MacDonagh R, Pearey R: Quality-of-life aspects in urology – benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 1999;17:199–204.
4.
Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Kay HE, Abrams P, de la Rosette JJMCH, Porru D, Thüroff JW, The International Continence Society ‘Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia’ Study Group: The International Continence Society ‘Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia’ study: The bothersomeness of urinary symptoms. J Urol 1997;157:885–889.
5.
Jolleys JV, Donovan JL, Nanchahal K, Peters TJ, Abrams P: Urinary symptoms in the community: how bothersome are they? Br J Urol 1994;74:551–555.
6.
Artibani W: Introduction. Eur Urol 2001;40(suppl 4):1–4.
7.
Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT: The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1992;148:1549–1557.
8.
Abrams P, Donovan JL, de la Rosette JJ, Schafer W: International Continence Society ‘Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia’ Study: background, aims, and methodology. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:79–91.
9.
Hughes A-M, Sladden MJ, Hirst GHL, Ward JE: Community study of uncomplicated lower urinary tract symptoms among male Italian immigrants in Sydney, Australia. Eur Urol 2000;37:191–198.
10.
DuBeau CE, Yalla SV, Resnick NM: Implications of the most bothersome prostatism symptom for clinical care and outcomes research. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:985–992.
11.
Sagnier P-P, MacFarlane G, Teillac P, Botto H, Richard F, Boyle P: Impact of symptoms of prostatism on level of bother and quality of life of men in the French community. J Urol 1995;153:669–673.
12.
Department of Veterans Affairs: A comparison of quality of life with patient reported symptoms and objective findings in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1993;150:1696–1700.
13.
Garraway WM, Russell EBAW, Lee RJ, Collins GN, McKelvie GB, Mehir M, Rogers ACN, Simpson RJ: Impact of previously unrecognized benign prostatic hyperplasia on the daily activities of middle-aged and elderly men. Br J Gen Prac 1993;43:318–321.
14.
Höfner K, Claes H, De Reijke T, Folkestad B, Speakman MJ, for the European Tamsulosin Study Group: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily: effect on sexual function in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 1999;36:335–341.
15.
Schou J, Holm NR, Meyhoff HH: Sexual function in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1996;179:119–122.
16.
MacFarlane GJ, Sagnier PP, Richard F, Teillac P, Botto H, Boyle P: Determinants of treatment-seeking behaviour for urinary symptoms in older men. Br J Urol 1995;76:714–718.
17.
Chapple CR: Introduction and concluding remarks. Eur Urol 1999;36(suppl 3):1–6.
18.
McNicholas TA: Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction: what are the current practice patterns? Eur Urol 2001;39(suppl 3):26–30.
19.
Tubaro A, Montanari E: Management of symptomatic BPH in Italy: who is treated and how? Eur Urol 1999;36(suppl 3):28–32.
20.
Chapple CR: Pharmacotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia – the potential for α1-adrenoceptor subtype-specific blockade. Br J Urol 1998;81(suppl 1):34–47.
21.
Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, Brawer MK, Dixon CM, Gormley G, Haakenson C, Machi M, Narayan P, Padley RJ: The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1996;335:533–539.
22.
Debruyne FMJ, Jardin A, Colloi D, Resel L, Witjes WP, Delauche-Cavallier MC, McCarthy C, Geffriaud-Ricouard C: Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 1998;34:169–175.
23.
Kirby R, Altwein JE, Bartsch G, Boyle P, Jardin A, Roehrborn CG: Results of the PREDICT (Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy) trial. J Urol 1999;161(suppl):266(abstract 1027).
24.
IMS HEALTH market share data (March 2000).
25.
GERS (Groupement pour l’Elaboration et la Réalisation de Statistiques) market share data (March 2000).
26.
Djavan B, Marberger M: A meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 1999;36:1–13.
27.
de Mey C: α1-Blockers for BPH: are there differences? Eur Urol 1999;36(suppl 3):52–63.
28.
Mearini E, Marzi M, Mearini L, Zucchi A, Porena M: Open prostatectomy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: 10-year experience in Italy. Eur Urol 1998:34:480–485.
29.
Boyle P, Gould AL, Roehrborn CG: Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urology 1996;48:398–405.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.