Purpose: Accurate imaging is essential for correct operative planning and successful surgical intervention in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our objective was the comparison of color duplex sonography with spiral computed tomography (CT) and surgical–pathological findings in the evaluation of renal masses to determine tumor localization, size, tumor thrombus extent and lymph node metastases. Methods: We evaluated 60 patients with a renal mass in a prospective study. Both color duplex sonography and CT were performed by different investigators without knowledge of the supposed diagnosis. The color Doppler findings were compared to CT and surgical pathological findings. Results: The sensitivity of color duplex sonography in the detection of RCC and lymph node metastases is comparable to that of CT (100%). Color duplex sonography was superior in the detection of renal vein involvement. Color duplex sonography alone allowed correct planning of the surgical procedure without intraoperative changes in all patients. Conclusion: Duplex sonography provides exactly the same information as CT. Although duplex sonography is less expensive with lower exposure to radiation, most surgeons will still probably demand CT for diagnosis, especially as this method is unerring and duplex sonography highly depends on the expertise of the person using it.

Keywords:
Renal cell carcinoma, Duplex sonography, Computer tomography, Tumor thrombosis
1.
Hatcher PA, Anderson EE, Paulson DF, Carson CC, Robertson JE: Surgical management and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma invading the vena cava. J Urol 1991;145:20–24.
2.
Kearney GP, Walters WB, Klein LA, Richie JP, Gittes RF: Results of inferior vena cava resection for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1981;125: 769–773.
3.
Skinner DG, Pfister RF, Colvin R: Extension of renal cell carcinoma into the vena cava: The rationale for aggressive surgical management. J Urol 1972;107:711–716.
4.
Amendola MA: Comparison of MR imaging and CT in the evaluation of renal masses. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989;29:117–150.
5.
Narumi Y, Hricak H, Presti JC Jr, Forstner R, Sica GT, Kuroda C, Sawai Y, Kotake T, Kinouchi T, Carroll PR: MR imaging evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:216–225.
6.
Choyke PL, Walther MM, Wagner JR, Rayford W, Lyne JC, Linehan WM: Renal cancer: Reoperative evaluation with dual–phase three–dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:767–771.
7.
Fritzsche PJ, Millar C: Multimodality approach to staging renal cell carcinoma. Urol Radiol 1992;14:3–7.
8.
Habboub HK, Abu–Yousef MM, Williams RD, See WA, Schweiger GD: Accuracy of color Doppler sonography in assessing venous thrombus extension in renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:267–271.
9.
Bos SD, Mensink HJ: Can duplex Doppler ultrasound replace computerized tomography in staging patients with renal cell carcinoma? Scand J Urol Nephrol 1998;32:87–91.
10.
McGahan JP, Blake LC, deVere White R, Gerscovich EO, Brant WE: Color flow sonographic mapping of intravascular extension of malignant renal tumors. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12:403–409.
11.
Zagoria RJ, Bechtold RE, Dyer RB: Staging of renal adenocarcinoma: Role of various imaging procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:363–370.
12.
Semelka RC, Hricek H, Stevens SK, Finegold R, Tomei E, Carroll PR: Combined gadolinium–enhanced and fat–saturation MR imaging of renal masses. Radiology 1991;178:803– 809.
13.
Johnson CD, Dunnick NR, Cohen RH, Illescus FF: Renal adenocarcinoma: CT staging of 100 tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:59– 63.
14.
Levine E: Renal cell carcinoma: Radiological diagnosis and staging. Semin Roentgenol 1987;22:248–257.
15.
Patel SK, Stack CM, Turner DA: Magnetic resonance imaging in staging of renal cell carcinoma. Radiographics 1987;7:703–728.
16.
Fein AB, Lee JK, Balfe DM, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS, McClennan: Diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma: A comparison of MR imaging and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:749–753.
17.
Horan JJ, Robertson CN, Choyke PL, Frank JA, Miller DL, Pass HI, Linehan WM: The detection of renal carcinoma extension into the renal vein and inferior vena cava: A prospective comparison of venocavography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 1989;142: 943–947.
18.
Roubidoux MA, Dunnick NR, Sostman HD, Leder RA: Renal carcinoma: Detection of venous extension with gradient–echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182:269–272.
19.
Giuliani L, Gilberti C, Martorana G, Isotta, Neumaier CE: Value of computerized tomography and ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava. Eur Urol 1987;13: 26–30.
20.
Roth S, Semjonow A, van Ahlen H, Oberpenning F, Piechota HJ, Hertle L: Surgical management of renal cell cancer with extension into the vena cava: Usefulness of intra–operative sonography. Eur Urol 1995;28:310–313.
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.