Objectives: Culture of transitional epithelium for urinary tract reconstruction has been problematic due, in part, to the dependence of urothelial cells on a basal layer of bladder fibroblasts for growth. In vitro studies on the effect of bladder, ureter, and intestinal fibroblast cocultures and conditioned media upon urothelial cell growth were conducted to better characterize the dependence of urothelial cells of fibroblasts. Methods: Primary cultures of human and porcine bladder, ureter, and intestinal fibroblasts and bladder and ureter urothelial cells were established. The urothelial cells were incubated with fibroblasts in a coculture system and growth compared to that of individual fibroblast and urothelial cultures. Urothelium–specific medium was exposed to the fibroblast cultures for 6, 12, and 24 h. Urothelial cell growth in each of the fibroblast–conditioned media was evaluated. Results: Coculture of human urothelial cells with human bladder and ureter fibroblasts yielded increased cell growth when compared to the cells in individual culture. This improvement was greatest for the bladder fibroblasts in coculture with bladder epithelial cells. The media exposed to bladder and ureter fibroblasts for 24 h significantly increased bladder and ureter urothelial growth compared to fresh medium. Coculture with intestinal fibroblasts and exposure to intestinal fibroblast conditioned media did not significantly stimulate urothelial cell growth. Similarly, coculture and conditioned media studies of porcine urothelial cells with porcine bladder and ureter fibroblasts (but not intestinal fibroblasts) yielded increased cell growth when compared to the cells in individual culture, particularly with bladder fibroblasts. However, human urothelial cells were not stimulated by porcine bladder and ureter fibroblast conditioned media, nor were porcine urothelial cells stimulated by human bladder and ureter fibroblast conditioned media. Conclusions: The ability of urinary fibroblasts to stimulate urothelial cell proliferation resides in an unidentified soluble factor secreted into the medium, independent of the presence of the fibroblasts. This factor is relatively organ and species–specific.

Keywords:
Bladder, Cell culture, Epithelium, Fibroblasts
1.
Baskin LS, Hayward SW, Young P, et al: Role of mesenchymal–epithelial interactions in normal bladder development. J Urol 1996;156: 1820–1827.
2.
Cunha GR, Fuji H, Neubauer BL, et al: Epithelial–mesenchymal interactions in prostatic development. I. Morphological observations of prostatic induction by urogenital sinus mesenchyme in epithelium of the adult rodent urinary bladder. J Cell Biol 1983;96:1662–1670.
3.
Kabalin JN, Peehl DM, Stamey TA: Clonal growth of human prostatic epithelial cells is stimulated by fibroblasts. Prostate 1989;14: 251–263.
4.
Wolf JS, Soble JJ, Ratliff TL, et al: Ureteral cell cultures. I. Characterization and cellular interactions. J Urol 1996;156:1198–1203.
5.
Liedl T: Flow cytometric DNA/cytokeratin analysis of bladder lavage: Methodical aspects and clinical implications. Urol Int 1995;54:22– 47.
6.
Reznikoff CA, Johnson MD, Norback DH, et al: Growth and characterization of normal human urothelium in vitro. In Vitro 1983;54:22– 47.
7.
Hutton KAR, Trejdosiewicz LK, Thomas DFM, et al: Urothelial tissue culture for bladder reconstruction: An experimental study. J Urol 1993;150:721–725.
8.
Loretz LJ, Reznikoff CA: Clonal growth of normal human uroepithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1988;24:333–342.
9.
Fujiyama C, Masaki Z, Sugihara H: Reconstruction of the urinary bladder mucosa in three–dimensional collagen gel culture: Fibroblast–extracellular matrix interactions on the differentiation of transitional epithelial cells. J Urol 1995;153:2060–2067.
10.
Hakim S, Merguerian P, Chavez D: Use of biodegradable mesh as a transport for cultured uroepithelial graft: An improved method using collagen gel. Urology 1994;44:139–140.
11.
Reznikoff CA, Loretz LJ, Pesciotta DM, et al: Growth kinetics and differentiation in vitro of normal human uroepithelial cells on collagen gel substrates in defined medium. J Cell Physiol 1987;131:285–301.
12.
Atala A: Autologous cell transplantation for urologic reconstruction. J Urol 1998;159:2–3.
13.
Rebel JM, de Boer WI, Thijssen CD, et al: An in vitro model of urothelial regeneration: Effect of growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins. J Pathol 1994;173:283–291.
14.
Scriven SC, Booth C, Thomas DFM, et al: Reconstitution of human urothelium from monolayer cultures. J Urol 1997;158:1147–1152.
15.
de Boer WI, Vermeij M, Diez de Medina SG, et al: Functions of fibroblast and transforming growth factors in primary organoid–like cultures of normal human urothelium. Lab Invest 1996;75:147–156.
16.
Schaeffer BM, Lorenz C, Back W, et al: Autologous transplantation of urothelium into demucosalized gastrointestinal segments: Evidence of epithelialization and differentiation of in vitro expanded and transplanted urothelial cells. J Urol 1998;159:284–290.
17.
Merguerian P, Chavez DR, Hakim S: Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de–epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits. J Urol 1994;152:671–674.
18.
Lutz N, Frey P: Enterocystoplasty using modified pedicled, detubularized, de–epithelialized sigmoid patches in the mini–pig model. J Urol 1995;154:893–898.
19.
Atala A, Vacanti JP, Peters CA, et al: Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol 1992;148:658–661.
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.