Objective: The diagnostic value of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of acute flank pain is investigated in a prospective study. Patients and Methods: In 125 patients aged 18–86 years, we performed unenhanced helical CT in addition to abdominal plain film, abdominal ultrasound and urinalysis as a diagnostic measure for acute flank pain. Ureteral calculi were confirmed or, respectively, excluded by retrograde ureteropyelography in 80 cases. In the other cases, diagnosis was verified by clinical course and/or stone asservation. Results: In 91 of 125 patients the flank pain was caused by a ureteral calculus. In 67 of 91 patients with urolithiasis, stones could be collected for analysis. Helical CT was able to precisely identify 90 ureteral calculi. Abdominal plain films led to 8 false–positive and 48 false–negative findings. Thus, sensitivity of plain radiography, ultrasound and urinalysis was 47, 11 and 84% with a specificity 76, 97 and 32%, respectively. Conclusions: Unenhanced helical CT reaches a distinctively increased diagnostic value (sensitivity 99%, specificity 97%) in the evaluation of acute flank pain as compared to plain radiography, ultrasound and urinalysis.

Keywords:
Helical computed tomography, Ureteral calculi, Urolithiasis, Acute flank pain
1.
Ruppert–Kohlmayr AJ, Stacher R, Preidler KW, Zigeuner R, Primus G, Ricabonna M, Szolar DHM: Nativ–Spiral–Computertomographie bei Patienten mit akutem Flankenschmerz – Sinn oder Unsinn? Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999;170:168–173.
2.
Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, Essenmacher KR, Verga M, Glickman MG, Lange RC: Acute flank pain: Comparison of non–contrast–enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995;194:789–794.
3.
Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, White B, Begun FP: Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR 1999;172:1485–1490.
4.
Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC: The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 1998;159:735–740.
5.
Fielding JR, Steele G, Fox LA, Heller H, Loughlin KR: Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: A replacement for excretory urography. J Urol 1997;157:2071–2073.
6.
Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, Goff WB, Kane CJ: Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology 1998;52:982–987.
7.
Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT: Diagnosis of acute flank pain: Value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR 1996;166:97–101.
8.
Vieweg J, Teh C, Freed K, Leder RA, Smith RHA, Nelson RH, Preminger GM: Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol 1998;160:679–684.
9.
Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG: Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: Incidence of associated urinary tract findings. AJR 1996;166: 1319–1322.
10.
Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Leder RA, Nelson RC: Urolithiasis: Detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT – A urologic perspective. Radiology 1998;207:308–309.
11.
Sommer FG, Olcott E: Helical computerized tomography in stone disease. Curr Opin Urol 1997;7:68–73.
12.
Svedström E, Alanen A, Nurmi M: Radiologic diagnosis of renal colic: The role of plain films, excretory urography and sonography. Eur J Radiol 1990;11:180–183.
13.
Brändle E, Hautmann R, Alken P, Hesse A, Schäfer R, Richter–Reichhelm M, Schalkhäuser K, Huland H, Rübben H, Melchior H: Diagnostik des Harnsteinleidens. Urologe A 1997;36:579–581.
14.
Thomsen HS, Bush WH Jr: Adverse effects of contrast media: Incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 1998;19:313–324.
15.
Gavant ML: Low–osmolar contrast media in the 1990s. Guidelines for urography in a cost–sensitive environment. Invest Radiol 1993;28: 13–19.
16.
Denton ER, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin SC: Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic – Is the radiation dose justifiable? Clin Radiol 1999;54:444–447.
17.
Keske U, Hierholzer J, Neumann K, Cordes M, Venz S, Amthauer H, Matschke S, Felix R: Zur Abschätzung der Patientendosis bei radiologischen Untersuchungen. Radiologe 1995;35: 162–170.
18.
Hamm M, Wawroschek F, Rathert P: Urinary cytology changes in protease inhibitor induced urolithiasis. J Urol 2000;163:1249–1250.
19.
Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC: Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: Correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997; 204:27–31.
20.
Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT: Acute renal obstruction: Value of secondary signs on helical unenhanced CT. AJR 1996;167:1109–1113.
21.
Miller OF, Kane CJ: Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Curr Opin Urol 2000;10:123–129.
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.