Objectives: To assess the additive benefit of combining an α1-blocker and a 5α-reductase inhibitor. Methods: This European, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involved 1.051 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients received sustained release (SR) alfuzosin (n = 358), a selective α1-blocker given at a dose of 5 mg twice daily without dose titration; finasteride (n = 344), 5 mg once daily, or both drugs (n = 349), for 6 months. Primary efficacy criteria were symptomatic improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score: I-PSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Results: Symptomatic improvement was significantly higher from the 1st month of treatment with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination; mean changes in I-PSS versus baseline at end-point were –6.3 and –6.1, respectively, compared with –5.2 with finasteride alone (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.01; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.03). The percentages of patients with a decrease in I-PSS of at least 50% were 43, 42 and 33% for SR alfuzosin, the combination and finasteride, respectively (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.008; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.009). In the overall population, increases in Qmax were greater with SR alfuzosin and the combination, compared with finasteride alone after 1 month of therapy, but changes at end-point were similar in the three treatment groups. In those 47% of patients likely to be obstructed (baseline Qmax <10 ml/s), however, mean increases in Qmax were significantly higher with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination, whatever the visit. Finasteride, alone or in combination, significantly impaired sexual function. The incidence of postural symptoms was low and similar in the three treatment groups. Conclusion: In this 6-month trial, SR alfuzosin was more effective than finasteride, with no additional benefit in combining both drugs.

1.
Jardin A, Bensadoun H, Delauche-Cavallier MC, Attali P: Alfuzosin for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lancet 1991;337:1457–1461.
2.
Buzelin JM, Roth S, Geffriaud-Ricouard C, Delauche-Cavallier MC, and the ALGEBI Study Group: Efficacy and safety of sustained-release alfuzosin 5 mg in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 1997;31:190–198.
3.
Eri LM, Tveter KJ: Alpha blockade in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1995;154:923–934.
4.
Gormley GJ, Stoner E, Bruskewitz RC, et al, for the Finasteride group: The effect of finasteride in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1185–1191.
5.
McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, et al: The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1998;338:557–612.
6.
Cockett AT, Aso Y, Denis L, et al: Recommendations of the International Consensus Committee; in Cockett ATK, Khoury AS, Aso Y, Chatelain C, Denis L, Griffiths K, Murphy G (eds): Proceedings of the 3rd International Consultation on BPH. Monaco, June 26–28, 1995. SCI, 1995, pp 625–640.
7.
Teillac P, Delauche-Cavallier MC, Attali P, and the DUALF Group: Urinary flow rates in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy following treatment with alfuzosin. Br J Urol 1992;70:58–64.
8.
Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, et al: The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1996;335:533–539.
9.
Cockett AT, Aso Y, Denis L, et al: Recommendations of the Internationl Consensus Committee; in Cockett ATK, Khoury AS, Aso Y, Chatelain C, Denis L, Griffiths K, Murphy G (eds): Proceedings of the 2nd International Consultation on BPH. Paris, June 27–30, 1993. SCI, 1993, pp 553–555.
10.
Carraro JC, Raynaud JP, Koch G, et al: Comparison of phytotherapy (Permixon®) with finasteride in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: A randomized international study of 1,098 patients. Prostate 1996;29:231–240.
11.
Abrams P, Bruskewitz R, De La Rosette J, Griffiths DF, Koyanagi T, Nordling J, et al: The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: Urodynamics; in Cockett ATK, Khoury AS, Aso Y, Chatelain C, Denis L, Griffiths K, Murphy G (eds): Proceedings of the 3rd International Consultation on BPH. Monaco, June 26–28, 1995. SCI, 1995, pp 297–367.
12.
Boyle P, Gould L, Roehrborn CG: Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. urology 1996;48:398–405.
13.
Buzelin JM, Delauche-Cavallier MC, Roth S, Geffriaud-Ricouard C, Santoni JP: Clinical uroselectivity: Evidence from patients treated with slow-release alfuzosin for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction. Br J Urol 1997;79:898–906.
14.
Buzelin JM, Fonteyne E, Kontturi M, Witjes WPJ, Khan A, for the European Tamsulosin Study Group: Comparison of tamsulosin with alfuzosin in the treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia). Br J Urol 1997;80:597–605.
15.
Lukacs B, Blondin P, McCarthy C, Du Boys B, Grippon P, Lassale C: Safety profile of 3 months therapy with alfuzosin in 13 339 patients suffering from benign prostatic hypertrophy. Eur Urol 1996;29:29–35.
16.
Martin D, Jammes D, Angel I: Effects of alfuzosin on urethral and blood pressures in conscious male rats. Life Sci 1995;57:387–391.
17.
Rouquier L, Claustre Y, Benavides J: α1-Adrenoceptor antagonists differentially control serotonin release in the hippocampus and striatum: A microdialysis study. Eur J Pharmacol 1994;261:59–64.
18.
Martin DJ, Lluel P, Guillot E, Coste A, Jammes D, Angel I: Comparative alpha-1 adrenoceptor subtype selectivity and functional uroselectivity of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;282:228–235.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.