Serum values of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) were determined in 180 patients prior to pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy and in 40 patients prior to pelvic lymphadenectomy alone. In all tumor stages, PSA was superior to PAP in detecting cancer of the prostate. By PSA determination using a cutoff level of 4 ng/ml (Tandem® assay), 28.8% of the patients with prostate cancer, stage pT(2)pN(0)M(0), and 17.8% of the cases with a stage pT(3)pN(0)M(0) tumor could not be detected. All these tumors had been noticed, however, by digital rectal examination. This indicates that PSA determination cannot replace digital rectal examination as a screening method for prostate cancer. In this study, it was possible neither by PSA nor by PAP to define a practicable cutoff level for patients with and without lymph node métastasés. A clear differentiation between the stages pT(2)pN(0)M(0) and pT(3)pN(0)M(0) was not possible by either PSA or PAP alone.

Keywords:
Prostatic carcinoma, Prostate-specific antigen, Prostatic acid phosphatase, Tumor stage
This content is only available via PDF.
1992
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.