Treatment with amiodarone is associated with changes in thyroid function tests, but also with thyroid dysfunction (amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism, AIH, and amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis, AIT). Both AIH and AIT may develop in apparently normal thyroid glands or in the presence of underlying thyroid abnormalities. AIH does not require amiodarone withdrawal, and is treated with levothyroxine replacement if overt, whereas subclinical forms may be followed without treatment. Two main types of AIT are recognized: type 1 AIT (AIT 1), a form of iodine-induced hyperthyroidism occurring in nodular goitres or latent Graves disease, and type 2 AIT (AIT 2), resulting from destructive thyroiditis in a normal thyroid gland. Mixed/indefinite forms exist due to both pathogenic mechanisms. AIT 1 is best treated with thionamides that may be combined for a few weeks with sodium perchlorate to make the thyroid gland more sensitive to thionamides. AIT 2 is treated with oral glucocorticoids. Once euthyroidism has been restored, AIT 2 patients are followed up without treatment, whereas AIT 1 patients should be treated with thyroidectomy or radioiodine. Mixed/indefinite forms of AIT are treated with thionamides. Oral glucocorticoids can be added from the beginning if a precise diagnosis is uncertain, or after a few weeks if response to thionamides alone is poor. The decision to continue or to stop amiodarone in AIT should be individualized in relation to cardiovascular risk stratification and taken jointly by specialist cardiologists and endocrinologists. In the presence of rapidly deteriorating cardiac conditions, emergency thyroidectomy may be required for all forms of AIT.
Amiodarone is a benzofuranic, iodine-rich drug, especially effective in the management of supraventricular arrhythmias and usually given at a daily dose of 200 mg . Because of its high iodine content (about 37% by weight, with a daily dissociation rate of iodine from the drug of about 10%) and pharmacological properties (inhibition of peripheral monodeiodination of thyroxine, T4), the drug causes changes in thyroid function tests and may be responsible for thyroid dysfunction. Approximately 15–20% of amiodarone-treated patients develop either thyrotoxicosis (amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis, AIT) or hypothyroidism (amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism, AIH) . The type of thyroid dysfunction is in part dependent on iodine intake, since AIH is relatively more frequent in iodine-replete and AIT in iodine-deficient geographical areas . Both AIT and AIH may occur early or late during amiodarone treatment, and develop in an apparently normal thyroid gland or in a gland with pre-existing abnormalities (nodular goitre, latent Graves disease, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis) . The epidemiology of AIT has changed over a period of 25 years in Italy, as the prevalence of AIT due to destructive thyroiditis (see below) has progressively increased ; this might be related to iodine fortification, but evidence for this is lacking.
Diagnosis, classification, and management of amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction, particularly AIT, are often challenging, as reflected by the heterogeneous responses of expert thyroidologists to several recent surveys [3, 4]. No specific predictors of the occurrence of amiodarone-associated thyroid dysfunction have been identified , although female gender and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies seem to predict AIH . These uncertainties are related to the limited evidence in this field provided by randomized clinical trials. Therefore, in April 2017 the European Thyroid Association (ETA) commissioned a task force to provide practice guidelines for the management of amiodarone-associated thyroid dysfunction. A chairperson was selected to lead the task force (L.B.) and five additional ETA members were identified (F.B., L.C., A.H.-D., T.P.L., and M.V.) and subsequently approved by the ETA Guidelines Board and the ETA Executive Committee on the basis of their clinical expertise in this field. This document is aimed at reviewing current evidence and providing answers to questions commonly asked in daily clinical practice.
Data acquisition was based on PubMed search strategies, with particular regard to papers published in the last 30 years. Furthermore, the list of references of relevant citations and chapters of major textbooks were evaluated for any additional appropriate citation.
The GRADE system was used to make recommendations and express the quality of the evidence . The task force used the following coding system: (1) indicates a strong recommendation and is associated with the phrase “we recommend;” (2) denotes a weak recommendation and is associated with the phrase “we suggest.” Evidence grading: ØOOO denotes very low quality evidence; ØØOO, low quality; ØØØO, moderate quality; and ØØØØ, high quality. The draft was discussed by the members of the task force, and then posted on the ETA website for 4 weeks, inviting comments from ETA members.
How Does Amiodarone Affect Thyroid Function Tests in Euthyroid Subjects?
Most euthyroid patients started on amiodarone (usually 200 mg/day) remain euthyroid, even if higher doses (400 mg/day) are used . However, all amiodarone-treated patients undergo early (≤3 months) and chronic (> 3 months) changes in serum thyroid function tests (Table 1). The huge iodine content of amiodarone increases plasma inorganic iodide 40-fold and urinary iodide excretion up to 15,000 μg per 24 h. Due to the Wolff-Chaikoff effect, the thyroid adapts to iodine overload by inhibiting iodine organification and by reducing thyroid hormone production rate: the latter effect is the primary cause of the initial increase in serum thyrotropin (TSH) concentration. Short-term treatment with amiodarone (400 mg/day for 3 weeks) decreased thyroxine (T4) production rate and T4 metabolic clearance rate . Amiodarone also inhibits the intracellular T4 transport and pituitary type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase (D2) activity, with a consequent reduction in intracellular triiodothyronine (T3) generation and thyroid hormone binding to its cognate pituitary receptor . However, these pituitary effects also occur in chronic stages during long-term amiodarone therapy and, therefore, are likely less important for the changes in TSH levels than the Wolff-Chaikoff effect. Later, the thyroid escapes from the Wolff-Chaikoff effect , resulting in a normalization of T4 and TSH serum concentrations. In this phase, serum total T4 (TT4), free T4 (FT4), and reverse T3 (rT3) levels increase, while serum total T3 (TT3) and free T3 (FT3) levels decrease because of the inhibitory effect of amiodarone on hepatic type 1 iodothyronine deiodinase (D1) activity [11, 12]. The increase in serum rT3 concentration is usually far greater than the decrease in serum T3 concentration . While amiodarone inhibits D1 activity in vivo, this effect has not been demonstrated in vitro for amiodarone but only for its metabolites . The above changes in serum T4, T3, and rT3 are observed early during amiodarone treatment and persist during prolonged treatment. After 3 months of therapy, a steady state is reached, with serum TSH returning to baseline values . TSH normalization is likely related to an increase in T4 production rate and a reduction in T4 metabolic clearance rate [8, 15]. Changes in T4 production and metabolic rates overcome the blockade of T3 generation, thus raising serum T3 levels into the low-normal range . A trend towards lower serum TSH concentration has been observed with continued treatment and related to the cumulative dose of amiodarone [2, 15]. Serum TT4, FT4, and rT3 levels remain at the upper end of normal range or are slightly elevated, whereas serum T3 (the biologically active hormone) levels are in the low-normal range. Thus, with this biochemical profile amiodarone-treated patients are considered to be euthyroid.
Should All Patients with AIH Be Treated and Should Amiodarone Be Withdrawn in These Patients?
The prevalence of AIH may be as high as 26 and 5% of amiodarone-treated patients in its subclinical (serum TSH levels between upper reference value and 10 mU/L, normal FT4 levels) and overt (serum TSH > 10 mU/L, low FT4 levels) forms, respectively . Although AIH may occur in patients with an apparently normal thyroid gland and absent thyroid autoimmunity, most frequently it develops in patients with underlying chronic autoimmune thyroiditis, with a higher prevalence in women and in those in iodine-replete areas [2, 17, 18]. There is no clear association between the daily or cumulative doses of amiodarone and the occurrence of AIH [18, 19]. Clinical AIH symptoms do not differ from those of hypothyroidism of other origin, but it is worth mentioning that severe hypothyroidism may predispose to an increase in ventricular susceptibility to life-threatening arrhythmias (e.g., torsade de pointes). Acute renal failure, reversible after levothyroxine (L-T4) replacement and amiodarone withdrawal, has been reported in one study . Overt AIH is diagnosed biochemically on low serum FT4 and high serum TSH levels; T3 or FT3 are low even in euthyroid patients.
AIH is easily treated with L-T4, and there is no need to discontinue amiodarone, if considered essential for the underlying cardiac disease . Treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism may be unnecessary in some cases, particularly in the elderly, in view of the potential increase in risk of cardiovascular events . Thyroid function should be tested every 4–6 months as there is a risk of progression to overt hypothyroidism , although subclinical AIH does not necessarily progress to overt AIH . In AIH patients treated with L-T4, it is recommended that the L-T4 dose be adjusted to normalize serum FT4 and FT3 levels and maintain serum TSH levels between the upper limit of the reference range or slightly below (upper third of normal range), and slightly elevated (< 10 mU/L) values in the case of overt AIH, to avoid the risk of overtreatment. If amiodarone is withdrawn, L-T4 overtreatment should be avoided because of possible exacerbation of heart disease symptoms; in some cases the L-T4 dose needs to be reduced, and in others L-T4 may be discontinued, because AIH subsides in about 50% of cases within 2–3 months, particularly in the absence of underlying thyroid abnormalities . Evidence is limited regarding the management of AIH in pregnancy . Amiodarone is prescribed to pregnant women only when there are no alternatives and when the benefits outweigh the risks. It is reasonable to treat AIH as well as all other forms of hypothyroidism in pregnancy . A therapeutic algorithm for AIH is shown in Figure 1.
Recommendation 1. AIH does not require amiodarone withdrawal. L-T4 treatment is recommended in all cases of overt AIH, whereas it may be avoided in some subclinical cases, particularly in the elderly, but with a frequent assessment of thyroid status to monitor possible progression to overt hypothyroidism (1, ØØOO).
How Many Types of AIT Can Be Identified and What Are the Diagnostic Criteria?
Type 1 AIT (AIT 1) is a form of iodine-induced hyperthyroidism caused by excessive, uncontrolled biosynthesis of thyroid hormone by autonomously functioning thyroid tissue in response to iodine load, which typically develops in underlying nodular goitre or latent Graves disease [1, 2, 24]. Type 2 AIT (AIT 2) is a destructive thyroiditis occurring in an otherwise substantially normal thyroid gland [1, 2, 24]. A mixed/indefinite type is also recognized where patients acquire an overlapping condition of both types. AIT 2 is more prevalent in iodine-sufficient areas [1, 2, 24] and, in general, is the most frequent form of AIT .
The diagnosis of AIT usually requires increased serum FT4 and FT3 and suppressed serum TSH levels. In rare cases of AIT associated with severe non-thyroidal illness, FT3 may be normal . The absolute levels of FT4 and FT3 at presentation have no discriminatory value between AIT 1 and AIT 2, although they tend to be higher in AIT 2 . Anti-thyroid antibodies, such as anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies, are often positive in AIT 1 and negative in AIT 2 , although their presence does not necessarily allow a diagnosis of AIT 1 .
Nuclear medicine and ultrasound imaging have been utilized for differentiation of AIT 1, AIT 2, or mixed forms of the disease. The timing of imaging in the disease process matters. No imaging modality alone can accurately define the best treatment strategy which is at least partially due to the presence of mixed forms of the disease.
Three different tracers are available, including radioiodine (RAI) with 131I or 123I, 99mpertechnetate (99mTcO4–) and 99mTcO4 2-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile (MIBI). In areas of baseline low/borderline low iodine intake, AIT 1 is accompanied by low, normal, or even high 24-h RAI uptake (RAIU), whereas the RAIU is mostly zero in patients with AIT 2. In iodine-replete environments, absent 24-h RAIU is invariably found in all patients taking amiodarone and it is not a useful investigation (Table 2) [1, 23]. Thus, RAIU has low diagnostic value in differentiating AIT 1 from AIT 2 in iodine-replete areas. The sensitivity for AIT 1 and specificity for AIT 2 from the available, albeit limited, data in studies with 99TcO4– and MIBI scintigraphy is low as the patient numbers studied so far are small [24, 28, 29]. This particularly applies to areas with iodine sufficiency.
Thyroid ultrasonography can rapidly assess thyroid volume, nodularity, parenchymal echogenicity, and vascularity. Overall, most evidence shows that standard thyroid ultrasonography has low diagnostic value in AIT. Colour-flow Doppler sonography (CFDS) provides a non-invasive, real-time assessment of thyroid vascularity . Although dependent on the necessary operator skills being available, it is, however, of great help in demonstrating the destructive nature of AIT 2 (absent hypervascularity in spite of high serum thyroid hormone levels) [1, 30] (Table 2).
Is AIT Always an Emergency Situation?
AIT can be a dangerous condition because it may exacerbate underlying cardiac abnormalities. AIT has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially in older patients with impaired left ventricular function [31-33]. Thus, in the majority of cases, particularly in the elderly, prompt restoration and stable maintenance of euthyroidism should be achieved as quickly as possible, and in selected categories of patients, detailed below, emergency management of AIT should be considered to obtain a prompt resolution of thyrotoxicosis.
From a general point of view, all patients with AIT should be considered potentially at risk of an emergency treatment. Thyrotoxicosis may be heralded, in some cases, by an unexplained increased sensitivity to warfarin due to an increased degradation of vitamin-dependent coagulation factors . Thyrotoxicosis may precipitate cardiac dysfunction even in asymptomatic patients. This is unlikely in patients with subtle/minor cardiac abnormalities, but more frequent in those with severe heart disease (e.g., congenital or post-infarction heart disease or ventricular arrhythmias). Total thyroidectomy is, currently, the best option for a rapid restoration of euthyroidism in this subset of patients [35-37]. If total thyroidectomy is considered, a multidisciplinary evaluation of the AIT patient involving cardiologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and anaesthesiologists is warranted to assess the risk-benefit balance in the individual patient. The choice of a specialist, high-volume thyroid surgeon is mandatory. Salvage thyroidectomy should be considered in the following conditions:
(a) patients with deterioration of cardiac function: patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have an increased mortality risk. AIT and left ventricular systolic dysfunction are independent factors associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [31, 32]. In AIT patients with low LVEF, mortality may be as high as 30–50% [31, 32]. These findings suggest that in patients with severe underlying cardiac disease, prolonged exposure to high thyroid hormone levels may further deteriorate cardiac function and be responsible for the increased mortality rate [31, 32]; and
(b) patients with a severe underlying cardiac disease (e.g., arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia) or patients with malignant arrhythmias.
Surgery, by rapidly restoring euthyroidism, can improve cardiac function within 2 months, mainly in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, thereby reducing the risk of mortality . Plasmapheresis, aimed at removing the excess thyroid hormones from the circulation, has been reported to be efficacious in patients not responding to medical therapies, but this effect is usually transient and followed by an exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis. Thus, its real advantage is uncertain. However, plasmapheresis may be a helpful tool in preparing thyrotoxic patients prior to surgery .
Recommendation 2. We recommend that AIT patients should be considered at risk of an emergency treatment at any time due to the increased mortality and morbidity, particularly in the elderly and/or if a reduced left ventricular dysfunction is present (1, ØØØO).
Recommendation 3. We recommend that total thyroidectomy be performed without delay in AIT patients with deterioration of cardiac function or severe underlying cardiac disease and in those patients whose thyrotoxicosis is unresponsive to medical therapies. This decision should be made by a multidisciplinary team of specialist endocrinologist, cardiologist, anaesthesiologist, and high-volume thyroid surgeon (1, ØØOO).
Can Amiodarone Be Continued in Some Cases of AIT?
There is neither consensus nor sufficient evidence concerning the decision to either continue or stop amiodarone in AIT patients. This decision should be individualized with respect to risk stratification and taken jointly by specialist cardiologists and endocrinologists [1, 19]. It is widely accepted that amiodarone should be continued in critically ill patients with life-threatening cardiac disorders responsive to the drug. Continuation of amiodarone treatment is probably also feasible in AIT 2, as this form is often self-limiting. In a randomized clinical trial of 36 AIT 2 patients treated with methimazole plus prednisone or sodium perchlorate, or prednisone and sodium perchlorate, all patients reached euthyroidism in 8–14 weeks despite continuing amiodarone . Similar results were reported in a small prospective study of 13 consecutive AIT 2 patients . In a Japanese study of 50 AIT 2 patients who continued amiodarone, recurrent AIT 2 was observed in only 3 patients several years after the first episode of AIT . On the other hand, in a large, matched retrospective cohort study of 83 AIT 2 patients, prednisone restored euthyroidism in most patients, irrespective of amiodarone continuation or withdrawal, but continuing amiodarone increased the recurrence rate of thyrotoxicosis, causing a delay in the stable restoration of euthyroidism and a longer heart exposure to thyroid hormone excess . If cardiac conditions are stable and non-severe, amiodarone can be safely discontinued and, if needed, restarted after restoration of euthyroidism. The problem is more complex in AIT 1 and mixed/indeterminate AIT cases, and many endocrinologists favour amiodarone withdrawal, if feasible from the cardiological standpoint [3, 43]. To summarize, the decision of whether amiodarone should be continued or withdrawn must take into account the potential benefit of amiodarone in life-threatening arrhythmias, the threat of a prolonged exposure to thyroid hormone excess, and the type of AIT (Table 3).
Recommendation 4. We suggest continuing amiodarone in life-threatening arrhythmias and in patients with critical illness with poor prognosis; in AIT 2 patients with non-life-threatening arrhythmias, the drug may be continued, but this may be associated with a prolongation of the period needed to achieve euthyroidism and, possibly, with a higher risk of recurrence. The decision to continue or to stop amiodarone should be individualized in relation to cardiovascular risk stratification and taken jointly by specialist cardiologists and endocrinologists (2, ØØOO).
What Is the Management of AIT 1?
Due to its prevalent pathogenic mechanism (see above), AIT 1 is best treated by antithyroid drugs (carbimazole, methimazole, or propylthiouracil) when a medical therapy is advisable (Fig. 2) [19, 44]. In some circumstances (see above) an emergency or salvage thyroidectomy may be the initial therapeutic choice.
The iodine-replete thyroid gland of AIT patients is less responsive to thionamides, so very high daily doses of the drug (40–60 mg/day of methimazole or equivalent doses of propylthiouracil) for longer than usual periods of time are often needed before euthyroidism is restored. This is obviously not an ideal situation in patients with underlying cardiac problems, whose hyperthyroidism should be promptly controlled. To increase the sensitivity and response of the thyroid gland to thionamides, potassium perchlorate, which decreases thyroid iodine uptake, has been used . To minimize the adverse effects of the drug (particularly on the kidney and bone marrow), doses not exceeding 1 g/day were used. In addition, it is recommended not to use the drug for more than 4–6 weeks . Because potassium perchlorate is no longer available, sodium perchlorate is an alternative option. Sodium perchlorate (Irenat®) is available as a solution – 21 drops corresponding to about 300 mg perchlorate. Thionamide therapy can be continued until euthyroidism is restored, if this is permitted by the underlying heart disease and cardiocirculatory compensation. After restoration of euthyroidism, a definitive therapy of the hyperfunctioning thyroid gland is usually advised (Fig. 2) . This allows safe reintroduction or continuation of amiodarone, if needed from the cardiological standpoint. If amiodarone can be discontinued, RAI therapy can be performed when iodine contamination is over, which may be up to 6–12 months after cessation of amiodarone, as suggested by normalized iodine urinary excretion and adequate RAIU values. Otherwise, total thyroidectomy should be considered. Definitive treatment of AIT 1 with an underlying hyperfunctioning thyroid gland does not differ from that of spontaneous hyperthyroidism.
In AIT 1 treated with thionamides, data are not available on the time required to restore euthyroidism or factors that predict euthyroidism. In the absence of evidence suggesting the coexistence of destructive thyroiditis, the use of glucocorticoids in AIT 1 is not recommended.
Recommendation 5. We recommend antithyroid drugs as the medical treatment of choice for most cases of AIT 1. Because the iodine-loaded thyroid gland is resistant to antithyroid drugs, a 4- to 6-week course of sodium perchlorate at doses not exceeding 1 g/day can be useful in accelerating control of hyperthyroidism (1, ØØØO).
What Is the Management of AIT 2?
Although AIT 2 is usually a self-limiting disease and may sometimes be mild, it can potentially exacerbate the underlying cardiac disease and, therefore, requires appropriate treatment . The only randomized study available compared prednisone (30 mg/day), sodium perchlorate (500 mg twice/day), or a combination of both drugs in 36 patients who continued amiodarone and were on methimazole (30 mg/day) from the onset of treatment . Prednisone treatment resulted in euthyroidism in all patients, while 30% of the patients treated with sodium perchlorate alone needed additional prednisone treatment to become euthyroid . Thus, prednisone was considered as the most effective treatment modality for these patients . Although the study was underpowered, these data confirmed an earlier retrospective observation showing that a 6-week treatment of 42 AIT 2 patients with methimazole alone resulted in euthyroidism in 15% of patients compared to 76% of the patients treated with prednisone alone . In a prospective randomized study of 12 patients, prednisone treatment alone was more effective in rapidly restoring euthyroidism compared to treatment with iopanoic acid . An earlier study had proposed the use of lithium to normalize thyroid function in AIT patients, but the effectiveness is limited and has not been confirmed . Thus, based on the available studies, oral glucocorticoids are the treatment of choice in AIT 2 (Fig. 2). The proposed initial dose is 30 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent doses of other glucocorticoids) tapered down based on clinical and/or biochemical euthyroidism . Severe cases of AIT 2 may require longer periods of treatment. If AIT presents an emergency (see paragraph above), salvage thyroidectomy can be considered in AIT 2, as well as in AIT 1 and mixed/indefinite forms (Fig. 2).
Recommendation 6. We recommend oral glucocorticoids as the first-line treatment for AIT 2 with moderate-to-severe thyrotoxicosis. The decision to treat milder or subclinical forms should be made taking into account the underlying cardiac conditions, with a close interaction with the specialist cardiologist (1, ØØØO).
Recommendation 7. We suggest that in patients in whom AIT 2 presents as an emergency, salvage thyroidectomy can be considered as for AIT 1 and mixed/indefinite forms (2, ØØOO).
What Is the Management of Mixed/Indefinite Forms of AIT?
Distinguishing between AIT 1, AIT 2, or mixed/indefinite forms can be important to guide the subsequent management [1, 48]. Mixed/indefinite forms of AIT, although not fully characterized, are encountered in clinical practice and are due to both pathogenic mechanisms of AIT 1 (iodine-induced hyperthyroidism) and AIT 2 (destructive thyroiditis) [1, 48]. It is highly unlikely that AIT patients with a morphologically normal thyroid gland, absent vascularity, and negative tests for anti-TSH receptor antibodies have a mixed/indefinite form of AIT. In these patients, physical examination, a quick CFDS and anti-TSH receptor antibody measurement allow the diagnosis of AIT 2 and glucocorticoid treatment. The time required to achieve euthyroidism varies depending on thyroid volume and the severity of thyrotoxicosis at presentation .
The differentiation between AIT 1 and mixed/indefinite AIT is more difficult, often representing an exclusion diagnosis, especially in the presence of nodular goitres, and the therapeutic approach is uncertain. If a precise diagnosis cannot be made, two possible approaches can be proposed (Fig. 2). The first one is to start with thionamides (± sodium perchlorate) as for AIT 1 and, in the absence of a biochemical improvement within a relatively short period of time (reasonably, 4–6 weeks), to add glucocorticoids with the assumption that a destructive component is also present superimposed on an underlying thyroid disorder. An alternative approach is represented by a combined treatment (thionamides and glucocorticoids) from the very beginning , which may expose a patient with cardiac disorders to undue glucocorticoid treatment. Evidence is lacking on the best therapeutic strategy for mixed/indefinite AIT, and randomized clinical trials are warranted. Because of the underlying thyroid disorder, a definitive treatment is usually required as for AIT 1. Thyroidectomy represents a valid option in the event of a poor response also to the combined treatment.
Recommendation 8. We suggest that in patients in whom a mixed/indefinite form of AIT is suspected, thionamides should be given initially. Whether glucocorticoids should be added from the very beginning or after a relatively short period (reasonably 4–6 weeks) of poor response remains to be established (2, ØØOO).
What Is the Role of Thyroidectomy or RAI Treatment in the Management of AIT?
In principle, RAI therapy is not feasible in the short term due to the iodine contamination and low RAIU values. RAI therapy with 131I after stimulation with recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) alone or combined with lithium therapy has been proposed for the treatment of AIT patients to overcome the problem of low RAIU values . However, owing to the very limited experience in this subset of patients and to the risk of an exacerbation of hyperthyroidism with consequent deleterious cardiac effects, this option should be considered with caution and is currently not recommended . However, RAI therapy can be considered for the definitive therapy of the underlying hyperfunctioning thyroid gland in patients with AIT 1 after resolution of the iodine load and restoration of adequate RAIU values .
In addition to the emergency setting, total thyroidectomy can be considered in the following conditions [35, 37, 53, 54]:
(a) as a definitive therapy of hyperthyroidism in alternative to RAI therapy;
(b) in patients who need to continue amiodarone therapy. In AIT 2 patients treated with glucocorticoids, continuation of amiodarone does not very much affect the time required for the first normalization of serum thyroid hormone levels. However, patients requiring continuation of amiodarone therapy show a high risk of recurrence of thyrotoxicosis during glucocorticoid therapy, although this information derives from a limited number of patients; accordingly, the surgical risk in this subset of patients should be carefully weighed against the possible (but not certain) risk of recurrent thyrotoxicosis. On the other hand, in AIT 1 patients, who need to continue amiodarone and have an underlying autonomously functioning thyroid gland, total thyroidectomy likely represents an appropriate option; and
(c) in patients showing adverse effect to medical therapy.
Recent studies have shown that total thyroidectomy can be performed in AIT patients, including those with moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction, without serious complications [35, 37, 53, 54]. Even though controlled studies are lacking, optimal preparation prior to surgery, including glucocorticoids and β-blockers, may reduce the surgical risk, irrespective of the AIT type. In general, restoration of euthyroidism before surgery is advisable, although controlled studies are not available. Plasmapheresis shortly before surgery may be considered.
Recommendation 9. We recommend ablation of a hyperfunctioning thyroid gland with an elective thyroidectomy or RAI treatment, as in other forms of spontaneous hyperthyroidism (1, ØØØO).
Recommendation 10. We suggest that euthyroidism be restored before total thyroidectomy or RAI treatment, unless definitive treatment is urgent (2, ØØOO).
Recommendation 11. We recommend against the use of rhTSH stimulation prior to RAI therapy in patients with AIT (1, ØOOO).
Can Amiodarone Be Restarted (if Necessary) in Patients with Previous AIT?
Only one study has addressed the issue of the reintroduction of amiodarone in patients with a history of AIT. In this retrospective study of 172 AIT patients, 46 needed a second course of amiodarone after a mean drug withdrawal of 2 years . AIT recurred in 14 out of 46 patients (30%), 12 out of 46 (26%) developed AIH, and the remaining 20 patients were euthyroid during a mean 6-year follow-up . The majority of the patients who suffered from recurrent AIT (11 out of 14) were classified as having AIT 1 . Other unpublished data, mentioned in Ryan et al. , reported a 9% rate of either recurrent AIT or developing hypothyroidism after restarting amiodarone therapy. The question of whether preventive antithyroid drug treatment or ablative therapy should be given prior to the reintroduction of amiodarone is unanswered because of the lack of evidence.
While AIH is easily managed, AIT represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Most patients with AIT 2 (destructive thyroiditis) are successfully treated by glucocorticoids and may not require amiodarone withdrawal. Treatment of AIT 1 (and mixed/indefinite forms) is far more complex because of resistance of the iodine-replete thyroid gland to antithyroid drugs. In view of the difficulties in the diagnostic differentiation between AIT 1 and mixed/indefinite forms, a multipharmacological approach is often used, and definitive treatment by RAI or thyroidectomy is generally necessary after its resolution, sometimes during the thyrotoxic phase, especially in the presence of rapidly deteriorating cardiac conditions. As reflected by the recommendations summarized in Table 4, evidence in the field of amiodarone-associated thyroid dysfunction is very limited because controlled studies are scarce. Large, multicentre randomized clinical trials are warranted to improve the management of these disorders.
The task force had no commercial support, and the members declare no conflict of interest.