Introduction: This study aimed at comparing thyroid cancer staging when taking into account the differences between the “T” assessment” using ultrasound (US) and histopathological measurements. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive differentiated follicular thyroid cancer (DTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients who underwent postoperative histopathological staging assessment at a single institution. Anaplastic thyroid carcinomas were excluded from the present study. Each malignant thyroid nodule was precisely evaluated by measuring its long axis using both US and gross specimen histopathological examination. T stage classification was attributed to each tumor as regards US (solely according to the tumor dimension) and histopathology: (1) solely according to the tumor dimension and (2) according to the tumor dimension and extrathyroidal extension features when present. Results: Retrospective comparison between US and histopathology size of the operated thyroid nodules showed a mean diminution of 7.52% of the tumor long axis. Tumors ≤10 mm at histopathological examination showed a larger decrease in size of 13% (p = 0.054, statistically significant) compared to the US measurements. Ten out of 72 (13.8%) patients showed final T downstaging in comparison to US assessment: (US) T2 to T1b in 6 patients (1 MTC) and (US) T1b to T1a in 4 patients (1 MTC). Two (2.9%) DTC patients were downstaged from stage 2 to stage 1. Conclusion: Precise thyroid tumor US measurement may differ significantly from that obtained by histopathological assessment, which may result in a different TNM staging and subsequent patient management.

Keywords:
Thyroid, Ultrasound, Papillary carcinoma, TNM staging
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2017 European Thyroid Association. Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.