Background: Differentiating between dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), which requires urgent therapy to prevent blindness, and moderate-to-severe Graves orbitopathy (GO) remains challenging. There is no pathognomonic feature of DON in either ophthalmological or radiological examinations. Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of radiological signs of DON in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with moderate-to-severe and very severe GO. Methods: Two researchers reassessed MRI scans of 23 consecutive patients (46 eyes) with active, moderate-to-severe GO and 14 patients (23 eyes) with very severe GO. Typical signs of DON in MRI include apical crowding and optic nerve stretching. These were evaluated in the eyes of both groups of patients. Lack of cerebrospinal fluid in the optic nerve sheath as well as muscle index values were also studied. These clinical evaluations and laboratory results were then compared between groups. Results: At least one of the typical radiological features of DON was found in 22 (96%) and 16 (35%) eyes with very severe and moderate-to-severe GO, respectively. Each occurred statistically more often in patients with very severe GO. There were no ophthalmological signs of very severe GO observed in the group of patients with moderate-to-severe GO during the study or its subsequent follow-up (234 weeks). Conclusions: MRI is a useful tool in evaluating very severe GO. However, features typical for DON are also found in up to 35% of eyes in patients with active, moderate-to-severe GO. Therefore, ophthalmological evaluation seems to be most important in the recognition of very severe GO.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.