Background: After resection of the carina with a length of more than 4 cm, anastomoses often need to be performed under tension despite maximum mobilization. If the patient cannot be extubated, the anastomosis remains under continued stress. Anastomoses of the carina can be constructed using various suture techniques, including single interrupted sutures, back wall running but front wall single interrupted sutures, and complete running suture. This experimental study was designed to determine the most tensile stress-resistant anastomotic suture technique. Materials and Methods: Isolated preparations of tracheobronchial trees were recovered from freshly slaughtered pigs. Resection of the carina was carried out in preparation of the experiments. After blind randomization, anastomoses (n = 15 per group) between the distal trachea and the proximal left main bronchus were performed with PDS 4-0 employing three different suture techniques: (1) single interrupted sutures, (2) back wall running but front wall single interrupted sutures (= mixed technique), and (3) complete running suture. The anastomotic specimen was fixed onto a specially constructed device. The tracheal end was intubated with a tube (CH 8.0) and connected to a respirator. Different weights were attached to the distal end of the preparation via a clamp and guide rollers. Airtightness was investigated at the following tensile loads: 0, 500, 1,000 and 1,500 g. Intrabronchial pressure was increased in 5-mbar steps. In an underwater trial, we analyzed whether anastomoses were airtight at a maximum intrabronchial ventilation pressure of 70 mbar. Results: At an intrabronchial pressure of 25 mbar without tensile stress, all anastomoses were initially airtight. In tensionless anastomoses at 70 mbar, 100% of single interrupted and continuous sutures were airtight, as compared to 80% of sutures in mixed technique. At 70 mbar and tensile loads of 1,500 g, 80% of single interrupted sutures, 60% of sutures in mixed technique and 53% of the running sutures remained competent. Conclusion: If tracheal anastomoses can be performed without tension, the suture technique is not important. With increased tension, anastomoses performed in single interrupted suture technique were clearly superior. Thus, in situations, where high tensile stress is to be expected, single interrupted sutures should be preferred.

Keywords:
Carina anastomosis, Carina resection, Surgical technique, Tensile stress, Pressure test, Suture technique
1.
Gonfiotti A, Jaus MO, Barale D, Macchiarini P: Carinal resection. Thorac Surg Clin 2014;24:477-484.
2.
Dartevelle P, Macchiarini P: Carinal resection for bronchogenic cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;8:414-425.
3.
Liu XY, Liu FY, Wang Z, Chen G: Management and surgical resection for tumors of the trachea and carina: experience with 32 patients. World J Surg 2009;33:2593-2598.
4.
Yamamoto K, Miyamoto Y, Ohsumi A, Imanishi N, Kojima F: Results of surgical resection for tracheobronchial cancer involving the tracheal carina. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;55:231-239; discussion 238-239.
5.
Parissis H, Young V: Carinal surgery: experience of a single center and review of the current literature. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:51.
6.
Regnard JF, Perrotin C, Giovannetti R, Schussler O, Petino A, Spaggiari L, Alifano M, Magdeleinat P: Resection for tumors with carinal involvement: technical aspects, results, and prognostic factors. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1841-1846.
7.
Porhanov VA, Poliakov IS, Selvaschuk AP, Grechishkin AI, Sitnik SD, Nikolaev IF, Efimtsev JP, Marchenko LG: Indications and results of sleeve carinal resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:685-694.
8.
Branscheid D, Beshay M: The technique of sleeve resection on the bronchial and pulmonary vascular tree. Chirurg 2013;84:459-468.
9.
Rea F, Marulli G, Schiavon M, Zuin A, Hamad AM, Feltracco P, Sartori F: Tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): short and long-term results in a single institution. Lung Cancer 2008;61:202-208.
10.
Yamamoto K, Miyamoto Y, Ohsumi A, Imanishi N, Kojima F: Surgical results of carinal reconstruction: an alternative technique for tumors involving the tracheal carina. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:216-220.
11.
Mitchell JD: Carinal resection and reconstruction. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2003;13:315-329.
12.
Mitchell JD, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Donahue DM, Allan JS, Moncure AC, Grillo HC: Resection for bronchogenic carcinoma involving the carina: long-term results and effect of nodal status on outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:465-471.
13.
Behrend M, Klempnauer J: Tracheal reconstruction under tension: an experimental study in sheep. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:581-588.
14.
Demetriou JL, Hughes R, Sissener TR: Pullout strength for three suture patterns used for canine tracheal anastomosis. Vet Surg 2006;35:278-283.
15.
Behrend M, Kluge E, Schüttler W, Klempnauer J: Breaking strength of native and sutured trachea. An experimental study on sheep trachea. Eur Surg Res 2001;33:255-263.
16.
Behrend M, Kluge E, Schüttler W, Klempnauer J: The mechanical stability under load of tracheal anastomoses after various phases in vivo. Laryngoscope 2002;112:364-369.
17.
Urschel JD: Comparison of anastomotic suturing techniques in the rat trachea. J Surg Oncol 1996;63:249-250.
18.
Friedman E, Perez-Atayde AR, Silvera M, Jonas RA: Growth of tracheal anastomoses in lambs. Comparison of PDS and Vicryl suture material and interrupted and continuous techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:188-193.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.