Purpose: Given the high attrition rate in the field of academic surgery, we aimed to characterise the professional and personal situations of female and male academic surgeons as well as to gather data on their respective perceptions of career advancement and work satisfaction. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany, inviting all identifiable academically highly qualified female surgeons and their male counterparts in a 1:2 ratio to participate. An anonymous 103-item online questionnaire was designed and the data collected between July and September 2014. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 93 female and 200 male surgeons, of whom 63 women (67.7%) and 70 men (35.0%) replied. The average age was 47.5 and 47.1 years, respectively. Respondents identified ‘high degree of expertise', ‘ambition', and ‘clarity of one's professional aims' as important factors affecting professional career development. Both groups felt ‘workload', ‘working hours/shifts', and ‘gender' to be a hindrance, the latter of significantly greater importance to female surgeons. The mean work satisfaction scores were high in both female (69.5%) and male (75.7%) surgeons. The predictors ‘support from superiors' (standardised β coefficient = 0.41) and ‘manual aptitude' (β = 0.41) contributed incrementally to the variance in ‘high degree of work satisfaction' (90-100%) observed for female surgeons. However, childcare provided by ‘kindergarten/crèche/after-school care' had the greatest negative predictive value (β = -1.33). Conclusions: Although there are many parallels, female faculty members experience the culture of academic surgery to some extent differently from their male counterparts, especially when impacted by parenthood and childcare. Faculty development programmes need to develop strategies to improve perceived equality in career opportunities by respecting individuals' requirements as well as offering gender-appropriate career guidance.

1.
Sheldon GF: The surgeon shortage: constructive participation during health reform. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:887-894.
2.
Gittes GK: The surgeon-scientist in a new biomedical research era. Surgery 2006;140:123-131.
3.
Cobey JC: The surgeon shortage: constructive participation during health reform. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:568; author reply 568.
4.
Diener MK, Menger MD, Jähne J, Saeger HD, Klar E: Future perspectives for surgical research in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014;399:253-262.
5.
Zerhouni EA: Translational and clinical science - time for a new vision. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1621-1623.
6.
Gottesman MM: The role of the NIH in nurturing clinician-scientists. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2249-2251.
7.
Atesok KI, Hurwitz SR, Egol KA, Ahn J, Owens BD, Crosby LA, Pellegrini VD Jr: Perspective: Integrating research into surgical residency education: lessons learned from orthopaedic surgery. Acad Med 2012;87:592-597.
8.
Sutton PA, Mason J, Vimalachandran D, McNally S: Attitudes, motivators, and barriers to a career in surgery: a national study of U.K. undergraduate medical students. J Surg Educ 2014;71:662-667.
9.
Nadeem M, Effendi MS, Hammad Ather M: Attrition in surgical residency programmes: causes and effects. Arab J Urol 2014;12:25-29.
10.
Bongiovanni T, Yeo H, Sosa JA, Yoo PS, Long T, Rosenthal M, Berg D, Curry L, Nunez-Smith M: Attrition from surgical residency training: perspectives from those who left. Am J Surg 2015;210:648-654.
11.
Richards JM, Drummond R, Murray J, Fraser S, MacDonald A, Parks RW: What proportion of basic surgical trainees continue in a surgical career? A survey of the factors which are important in influencing career decisions. Surgeon 2009;7:270-275.
12.
Pololi LH, Krupat E, Civian JT, Ash AS, Brennan RT: Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 2012;87:859-869.
13.
Lowenstein SR, Fernandez G, Crane LA: Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:37.
14.
Richardson HC, Redfern N: Why do women reject surgical careers? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:290-293.
15.
Abele AE, Nitzsche U: A scissors-effect in career development of female and male medical doctors. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2002;127:2057-2062.
16.
Flannery AM: Success, women, and academic surgery. Surgery 2002;131:670-671.
17.
Schroen AT, Brownstein MR, Sheldon GF: Women in academic general surgery. Acad Med 2004;79:310-318.
18.
Cochran A, Hauschild T, Elder WB, Neumayer LA, Brasel KJ, Crandall ML: Perceived gender-based barriers to careers in academic surgery. Am J Surg 2013;206:263-268.
19.
Goldberg LR: An alternative ‘description of personality': the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;59:1216-1229.
20.
Drosdeck JM, Osayi SN, Peterson LA, Yu L, Ellison EC, Muscarella P: Surgeon and nonsurgeon personalities at different career points. J Surg Res 2015;196:60-66.
21.
Pololi LH, Civian JT, Brennan RT, Dottolo AL, Krupat E: Experiencing the culture of academic medicine: gender matters, a national study. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:201-207.
22.
Burgess DJ, Joseph A, van Ryn M, Carnes M: Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine? Acad Med 2012;87:506-512.
23.
Steele CM: A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol 1997;52:613-629.
24.
Riska E: Gender and medical careers. Maturitas 2011;68:264-267.
25.
Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD: Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation? Arch Surg 2006;141:1086-1094; discussion 1094.
26.
Pololi L, Kern DE, Carr P, Conrad P, Knight S: The culture of academic medicine: faculty perceptions of the lack of alignment between individual and institutional values. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:1289-1295.
27.
Levine RB, Lin F, Kern DE, Wright SM, Carrese J: Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: a qualitative study at a single institution. Acad Med 2011;86:752-758.
28.
Borges NJ, Navarro AM, Grover AC: Women physicians: choosing a career in academic medicine. Acad Med 2012;87:105-114.
29.
Willett LL, Wellons MF, Hartig JR, Roenigk L, Panda M, Dearinger AT, Allison J, Houston TK: Do women residents delay childbearing due to perceived career threats? Acad Med 2010;85:640-646.
30.
Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight JE Jr, Ho HS, Troppmann C: Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg 2009;144:635-642.
31.
German Federal Office of Statistics: Birth trends and family situation. https://www.destatis.de (accessed March 21, 2016).
32.
Wai PY, Dandar V, Radosevich DM, Brubaker L, Kuo PC: Engagement, workplace satisfaction, and retention of surgical specialists in academic medicine in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:31-42.
33.
Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG: Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1282-1289.
34.
Hitchcock MA, Bland CJ, Hekelman FP, Blumenthal MG: Professional networks: the influence of colleagues on the academic success of faculty. Acad Med 1995;70:1108-1116.
35.
Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Nugent E, Ryan D, Traynor OJ, Neary PC: The impact of aptitude on the learning curve for laparoscopic suturing. Am J Surg 2014;207:263-270.
36.
Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Gallagher TK, Conroy RM, Traynor OJ, Neary PC: Does aptitude influence the rate at which proficiency is achieved for laparoscopic appendectomy? J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:1020-1027.
37.
Bishawi M, Pryor AD: Should technical aptitude evaluation become part of resident selection for surgical residency? Surg Endosc 2014;28:2761-2762.
38.
Sonnino RE: Professional development and leadership training opportunities for healthcare professionals. Am J Surg 2013;206:727-731.
39.
Cropsey KL, Masho SW, Shiang R, Sikka V, Kornstein SG, Hampton CL: Why do faculty leave? Reasons for attrition of women and minority faculty from a medical school: four-year results. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17:1111-1118.
40.
Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B: Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. JAMA 1985;254:2775-2782.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.