Background: Since its introduction more than 20 years ago, evidence-based medicine has become an important principle in the daily routine of clinicians around the globe. Nevertheless, many surgical interventions are still not based on high-quality evidence from clinical trials. This is partially due to the fact that surgical trials pose some specific obstacles, which have to be overcome during the planning and conduct of such a trial. Objective: In this study, we will highlight specific challenges and discuss explicit obstacles of surgical clinical research. Moreover, potential solutions will be substantiated by the experience of the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC) in surgical clinical research. Conclusions: Surgical researchers should be equipped with a basic knowledge of research methodology to be able to overcome the common impediments posed by surgical trials. Collaborations between surgeons and methodologists as well as trial networks have proven to be useful in accomplishing high-quality surgical research in various randomized controlled trials. By maintaining and refining this work and with sufficient and prompt translation of investigational knowledge into daily practice, the treatment of surgical patients should result in an improved outcome in the future.

Keywords:
Evidence-based surgery, Randomization, Blinding, Surgical trials, Trial methodology
1.
Ergina PL, et al: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009;374:1097-1104.
2.
Diener MK, Seiler CM, Antes G: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery (in German). Chirurg 2007;78:938-944.
3.
Howes N, et al: Surgical practice is evidence based. Br J Surg 1997;84:1220-1223.
4.
Kingston R, et al: Treatment of surgical patients is evidence-based. Eur J Surg 2001;167:324-330.
5.
Wente MN, et al: Perspectives of evidence-based surgery. Dig Surg 2003;20:263-269.
6.
Horng S, Miller FG: Is placebo surgery unethical? N Engl J Med 2002;347:137-139.
7.
Miller FG: Sham surgery: an ethical analysis. Am J Bioeth 2003;3:41-48.
8.
Sackett D, et al: How to Practice and Teach Evidence Based Medicine, ed 2. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
9.
Hulley SB, et al: Designing Clinical Research, ed 3. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007.
10.
Clarke M: Doing new research? Don't forget the old. PLoS Med 2004;1:e35.
11.
DeAngelis CD, et al: Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004;292:1363-1364.
12.
Krleza-Jeric K, et al: Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1). BMJ 2005;330:956-958.
13.
Bassi C, et al: Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 2004;21:54-59.
14.
Butturini G, et al: Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13:207-211.
15.
Bassi C, et al: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.
16.
Koch M, et al: Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011;149:680-688.
17.
Wente MN, et al: Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20-25.
18.
Williamson P, Clarke M: The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:ED000041.
19.
Hackert T, et al: Pylorus resection or pylorus preservation in partial pancreatico-duodenectomy (PROPP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:44.
20.
Wente MN, et al: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761-768.
21.
Solomon MJ, et al: Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Surgery 1994;115:707-712.
22.
Diener MK, et al: Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial. Lancet 2014;384:142-152.
23.
McCulloch P, et al: Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 2002;324:1448-1451.
24.
Saad S, et al: Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2013;100:339-349.
25.
Seiler CM, et al: Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg 2009;249:913-920.
26.
Strobel O, Buchler MW: The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2013;100:172-173.
27.
Cook JA: The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials 2009;10:9.
28.
Ohwada S, et al: Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998;22:494-498.
29.
Yanagimoto H, et al: Pancreaticogastrostomy following distal pancreatectomy prevents pancreatic fistula-related complications. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;21:473-478.
30.
Cook JA, Ramsay CR, Fayers P: Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials. Clin Trials 2004;1:421-427.
31.
Knebel P, et al: Insertion of totally implantable venous access devices: an expertise-based, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00600444). Ann Surg 2011;253:1111-1117.
32.
Cook JA, Ramsay CR, Fayers P: Using the literature to quantify the learning curve: a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007;23:255-260.
33.
Cook JA, et al: A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial. PLoS One 2012;7:e49178.
34.
McCulloch P, et al: No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105-1112.
35.
Antes G, Clarke M: Knowledge as a key resource for health challenges. Lancet 2012;379:195-196.
36.
Chan AW, et al: Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 2014;383:257-266.
37.
Chan AW, et al: SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200-207.
38.
Diener MK, et al: Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1514-1522.
39.
Antes G, Sauerland S, Seiler CM: Evidence-based medicine - from best research evidence to a better surgical practice and health care. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006;391:61-67.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.