Background: Early postoperative enteral nutrition has been suggested to improve the nutritional status of patients after esophageal surgery. However, whether enteral nutrition decreases rates of surgical complications and increases the completion rate of the clinical management pathway is unclear. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who were randomly assigned to either an enteral or parenteral nutrition group after undergoing esophagectomy, compared the incidence of surgical complications, and evaluated the completion rate of the clinical pathway. In these 2 patient groups, perioperative management was performed through identical clinical pathways, except for nutrition. Results: The overall rate of surgical complications of any type did not differ between patients who received early enteral nutrition and those who did not (p = 0.50); however, the rate of life-threatening surgical complications was significantly lower in patients who received early enteral nutrition (p = 0.02). The rate of non-life-threatening surgical complications did not differ between the groups (p = 0.98). In patients who received enteral nutrition, the completion rate of the clinical pathway was higher (p = 0.03), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Early enteral nutrition reduces the incidence of life-threatening surgical complications and improves the completion rate of the clinical pathway for thoracic esophagectomy.

1.
Windsor AC, Klava A, Somers SS, Guillou PJ, Reynolds JV: Manipulation of local and systemic host defense in the prevention of perioperative sepsis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1460–1467.
2.
Lubbers T, de Haan JJ, Luyer MD, Verbaeys I, Hadfoune M, Dejong CH, Buurman WA, Greve JW: Cholecystokinin/Cholecystokinin-1 receptor-mediated peripheral activation of the afferent vagus by enteral nutrients attenuates inflammation in rats. Ann Surg 2010;252:376–382.
3.
Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, Ratzenhofer B, Lindenmann J, Sankin O, Pinter H, Maier A, Smolle J, Smolle-Jüttner FM: Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 2005;93:509–513.
4.
Alanezi K, Urschel JD: Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;10:71–75.
5.
Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, Rentz JJ, Neumayer LA, Pappas TN, Daley J, Henderson WG, Krasnicka B, Khuri SF: Outcome after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–222.
6.
Goldberg RF, Austen WG Jr, Zhang X, Munene G, Mostafa G, Biswas S, McCormack M, Eberlin KR, Nguyen JT, Tatlidede HS, Warren HS, Narisawa S, Millan JL, Hodin RAl: Intestinal alkaline phosphatase is a gut mucosal defense factor maintained by enteral nutrition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:3551–3556.
7.
Bastian L, Weimann A: Immunonutrition in patients after trauma. Br J Nutr 2002;87:133–134.
8.
Van Leeuwen PA, Boermeester MA, Houdijk AP, Ferwerda CC, Cuesta MA, Meyer S, Wesdirp RI: Clinical significance of translocation. Gut 1994;35:S28–S34.
9.
Shou J, Lappin J, Minnard EA, Daly JM: Total parenteral nutrition, bacterial translocation, and host immune function. Am J Surg 1994;167:145–150.
10.
Mercer CD, Mungara A: Enteral feeding in esophageal surgery. Nutrition 1996;12:200–201.
11.
Sand J, Luostarinen M, Matikainen M: Enteral or parenteral feeding after total gastrectomy: prospective randomized pilot study. Eur J Surg 1997;163:761–766.
12.
Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S: Early enteral feeding versus ‘nil by mouth’ after gastrointestinal surgery. BMJ 2001;323:773–776.
13.
Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, Gavazzi C, Mariani L: Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492.
14.
Baigrie RJ, Devitt PG, Watkins DS: Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesphagogastric surgery: a prospective randomized comparison. Aust NZJ Surg 1996;66:668–670.
15.
Aiko S, Yoshizumi Y, Sugiura Y, Matsuyama T, Naito Y, Matsuzaki J, Maehara T: Beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 2001;31:971–978.
16.
Powell JJ, Murchison JT, Fearon KC, Ross JA, Siriwardena AK: Randomized controlled trial of the effect of early enteral nutrition on markers of the inflammatory response in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1375–1381.
17.
Austrums E, Pupelis G, Snippe K: Postoperative enteral stimulation by gut feeding improves outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Nutrition 2003;19:487–491.
18.
Okada Y, Klein N, van Saene HK, Pierro A: Small volumes of enteral feedings normalise immune function in infants receiving parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:16–19.
19.
Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minard G, Tolley EA, Poret HA, Kuhl MR, Brown RO: Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1992;215:503–511.
20.
Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FV, Morgenstein-Wagner TB, Kellum JM Jr, Welling RE, Moore EE: Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992;216:172–183.
21.
Bollschweiler E, Schröder W, Hölscher AH, Siewert JR: Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 2000;87:1106–1110.
22.
Windsor JA, Hammodat H: Metabolic management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 2000;24:664–672.
23.
Kingsnorth A: Role of cytokines and their inhibitors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1997;40:1–4.
24.
Das-Neves-Pereira JC, Bagan P, Coimbra-Israel AP, Grimaillof-Junior A, Cesar-Lopez G, Milanez-de-Campos JR, Riquet M, Biscegli-Jatene F: Fast-track rehabilitation for lung cancer lobectomy: a five-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:383–391.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.