Background: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation avoids postoperative functional disturbances. The aim of this feasibility study was to develop a neuromonitoring system with simultaneous intraoperative verification of internal anal sphincter (IAS) activity and intravesical pressure. Methods: 14 pigs underwent low anterior rectal resection. During intermittent bipolar electric stimulation of the inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP) and the pelvic splanchnic nerves (PSN), electromyographic signals of the IAS and manometry of the urinary bladder were observed simultaneously. Results: Stimulation of IHP and PSN as well as simultaneous intraoperative monitoring could be realized with an adapted neuromonitoring device. Neurostimulation resulted in either bladder or IAS activation or concerted activation of both. Intravesical pressure increase as well as amplitude increase of the IAS neuromonitoring signal did not differ significantly between stimulation of IHP and PSN [6.0 cm H2O (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5–9.0) vs. 6.0 cm H2O (IQR 3.0–10.0) and 12.1 µV (IQR 3.0–36.7) vs. 40.1 µV (IQR 9.0–64.3)] (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Pelvic autonomic nerve stimulation with simultaneous intraoperative monitoring of IAS and bladder innervation is feasible. The method may enable neuromonitoring with increasing selectivity for pelvic autonomic nerve preservation.

1.
Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, Kiebert GM, Kranenberg WMK, van de Velde CJH: Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 1998;85:92–97.
2.
Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, Oki S, Shimada H: Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1140–1145.
3.
Chang PL, Fan HA: Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol 1983;130:948–951.
4.
Havenga K, Enker WE, McDermott K, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Guillem J: Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1996;182:495–502.
5.
Heald RJ: Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 1995;82:1297–1299.
6.
Maurer CA: Urinary and sexual function after total mesorectal excision. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005;165:196–204.
7.
Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ: Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Rev Br J Surg 1998;85:1036–1043.
8.
Böhm G, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Decius A, Heussen N, Schumpelick V, Willis S: Anorectal, bladder, and sexual function in females following colorectal surgery for carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:893–900.
9.
Moriya Y: Function preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 2006;11:339–343.
10.
Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, Klein Kranenbarg E, van de Velde CJ: A prospective study on radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:751–757.
11.
Wallner C, Lange MM, Bonsing BA, Maas CP, Wallace CN, Dabhoiwala NF, Rutten HJ, Lamers WH, Deruiter MC, van de Velde CJ: Causes of fecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the cooperative clinical investigators of the Dutch total Mesorectal Excision Trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;26:4466–4472.
12.
Mauroy B, Demondion X, Bizet B, Claret A, Mestdagh P, Hurt C: The female inferior hypogastric (= pelvic) plexus: anatomical and radiological description of the plexus and its afferences – applications to pelvic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:55–66.
13.
Kneist W, Kauff DW, Rahimi Nedjat RK, Rink AD, Heimann A, Somerlik K, Koch KP, Doerge T, Lang H: Intraoperative pelvic nerve stimulation performed under continuous electromyography of the internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25:1325–1331.
14.
Kneist W, Junginger T: Validity of pelvic autonomic nerve stimulation with intraoperative monitoring of bladder function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:262–269.
15.
Kneist W, Junginger T: Intraoperative electrostimulation objectifies the assessment of functional nerve preservation after mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:675–682.
16.
Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R, Leung RA, Kurokawa K, Murakami G, Fujisawa M: Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol 2007;177:225–229.
17.
Da Silva GM, Zmora O, Börjesson L, Mizhari N, Daniel N, Khandwala F, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AM, Wexner SD: The efficacy of a nerve stimulator (Cavermap) to enhance autonomic nerve identification and confirm nerve preservation during total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2354–2361.
18.
Kneist W, Junginger T: Male urogenital function after confirmed nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision with dissection in front of Denonvilliers’ fascia. World J Surg 2007;31:1321–1328.
19.
Kneist W, Kuhn E, Berger S, Knabe J, Ekkert B, Junginger T: Kontinenz nach Chirurgie des Rektumkarzinoms – Bedeutung des Nervenerhalts und Wertigkeit der intraoperativen Neurostimulation; in Deutsche Kontinenz Gesellschaft (eds): Inkontinenz – eine soziale Herausforderung. Stuttgart, Thieme, 2006, p 71.
20.
Stelzner F: Der vergessene Sphinkter ani internus im Mittelpunkt des anorektalen Kontinenzorgans; in Stelzner F (eds): Chirurgie an viszeralen Abschlusssystemen. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1998, pp 188–196.
21.
Rink AD, Kneist W, Radinski I, Guinot-Barona A, Lang H, Vestweber KH: Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:342–350.
22.
Taguchi K, Tsukamoto T, Murakami G: Anatomical studies of the autonomic nervous system in the human pelvis by the whole-mount staining method: left-right communicating nerves between bilateral pelvic plexus. J Urol 1999;161:320–325.
23.
Baader B, Herrmann M: Topography of pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat 2003;16:119–130.
24.
Clausen N, Wolloscheck T, Konerding MA: How to optimize autonomic nerve preservation in total mesorectal excision: clinical topography and morphology of pelvic nerves and fasciae. World J Surg 2008;32:1768–1775.
25.
Buntzen S, Hulten L, Delbro D, Nordgren S: The effect of pelvic nerve stimulation on recto-anal motility in the cat. J Auton Nerv Syst 1996;61:243–247.
26.
Garrett JR, Howard ER, Jones W: The internal anal sphincter in the cat: a study of nervous mechanisms affecting tone and reflex activity. J Physiol 1974;243:153–166.
27.
Carlstedt A, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Hulten L: The influence of the pelvic nerves on anorectal motility in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1989;135:57–64.
28.
Andersen IS, Buntzen S, Rijkhoff NJM, Dalmose AL, Djurhuus JC, Laurberg S: Anorectal motility responses to pelvic, hypogastric and pudendal nerve stimulation in the Göttingen minipig. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006;18:153–161.
29.
Yucel S, Baskin LS: Neuroanatomy of the ureterovesical junction: clinical implications. J Urol 2003;170:945–948.
30.
Takenaka A, Soga H, Murakami G, Niikura H, Tatsumi H, Yaegashi N, Tanaka K, Fujisawa M: Understanding anatomy of ‘hilus’ of detrusor nerves to avoid bladder dysfunction after pelvic surgery: demonstration using fetal and adult cadavers. Urology 2009;73:251–257.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.