Background/Aims: To determine whether intravenous morphine comedication improves bile duct visualization, diameter and/or volume applying intravenous CT cholangiography in a porcine liver model. Methods: 12 Landrace pigs underwent intravenous CT cholangiography. Eight minutes after initiation of the contrast material infusion, either morphine sulfate (n = 6 animals) or normal saline (n = 6 animals) was administered. Eighteen consecutive CT scans of the liver were acquired with 2-min intervals starting with initiation of the contrast material infusion. Maximum bile duct visualization scores, diameters and volumes and time to maximum bile duct visualization scores, diameters and volumes were determined. Results: Maximum bile duct visualization scores, diameters and volumes and time to maximum bile duct visualization scores, diameters and volumes were not significantly different when the morphine group was compared to the normal saline group. Maximum bile duct visualization scores ranged between 4.00 ± 0.00 and 2.83 ± 1.47. Maximum bile duct diameters ranged between 6.77 ± 0.40 and 2.10 ± 1.35 mm. Maximum bile duct volume was 16.41 ± 7.33 ml in the morphine group and 16.79 ± 5.65 ml in the normal saline group. Conclusion: Intravenous morphine comedication failed to improve bile duct visualization and to increase bile duct diameter and volume applying CT cholangiography.

Keywords:
Cholangiography, Computed tomography, Morphine, Biliscopin, Biliary system, Postprocessing
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.