Aim: To present the results of a new modification of dismembered pyeloplasty performed to prevent the occurrence of secondary obstruction. Methods: Modified dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 35 children (age range 3 months to 16 years) who had unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In postoperative follow-up, presence of hydronephrosis on ultrasonography, differential renal function (DRF) and renal drainage half-time on technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) renography were recorded and compared with preoperative data. Results: Mean anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter, mean preoperative DRF and radioisotope clearance half-time on DTPA renography of the affected kidneys were 61.4 mm, 38.6% and 34.3 min in children with prenatal hydronephrosis, and 67.5 mm, 37.6% and 39.4 min in children that presented with symptoms, respectively. After surgery, mean anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter, mean DRF and radioisotope clearance half-time on DTPA renography of the affected kidneys were 10.9 mm, 45.9% and 11.9 min in children with prenatal hydronephrosis, and 20 mm, 41.9% and 15.2 min in children that presented with symptoms, respectively. No failure was observed in any patient at an average follow-up of 26 months (range 1–5 years). Conclusions: Open dismembered pyeloplasty is the treatment of choice for intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The modification of dismembered pyeloplasty that we performed is an alternative for the prevention of secondary obstruction.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.