Background: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation in general surgery. Prosthetic reinforcement of the inguinal area with polypropylene mesh has increased dramatically in the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate how different types of mesh affect the spermatic cord structures. Methods: Thirty rats were divided into three groups. The spermatic cord was dissected free and a conventional suture repair was performed in group I, an operation mimicking the Lichtenstein operation with a heavyweight polypropylene mesh in group II and the same operation using large pore, lightweighted polypropylene/polyglactin composite mesh in group III. A vasography was performed after 90 days. The cross-sectional area of the vas deferens and s-testosterone from the spermatic vein were measured using the contralateral side as control. Light microscopy of the inguinal canal was performed and inflammation and fibrosis were graded. Results: Vasography revealed patent vas deferens in all animals. In group III, there was a lower s-testosterone in the spermatic vein and a reduced cross-sectional area of the vas deferens on the operated compared to the control side. However, there was no difference in the other groups and there was no significant difference in s-testosterone levels between the groups. There was significantly more inflammation and fibrosis after mesh repair compared to suture repair, but there was no difference between the two mesh groups. Unexpectedly, polyglactin fibres were still seen in specimens in group III after 90 days. Conclusion: In conclusion, the only effect on the spermatic cord structures in a rat model is seen as an impaired s-testosterone production and a reduced cross-sectional area of the vas deferens after use of a low-weight composite mesh compared to the control side. No difference in inflammation or fibrosis was found between heavyweight polypropylene mesh and low-weight composite mesh.

Keywords:
Inguinal hernia repair, Mesh repair, Mesh, foreign body reaction, Mesh implantation, experimental study, Polypropylene mesh
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.