Tracheal anastomoses are, even more so than other sutures, often only possible to prepare under tension and thus in danger of breakage. No information is available regarding native tracheae and freshly sutured tracheae. For this reason, our objective was to examine the tensile strength of native tracheae and compare it with freshly sutured specimens. Fresh tracheae were collected from the local slaughterhouse within 30 min of slaughter. With the help of a suitable holding device, 24 fresh tracheae were mounted on a material testing machine and stretched to breaking point, during which the force and distance required were recorded. The same study was carried out on each 10 freshly anastomosed tracheae using three different suturing techniques. The mean value of the maximum force required for native tracheae was 198 N. With continuous suturing (polypropylene), a mean value of 171 N was attained, and with single interrupted suturing (polydioxanone and polyglactin 910), 123 N, respectively, 108 N. Differences between the groups proved to be highly significant. With respect to the mechanical strain from traction, the continuous suture proved to be statistically identical to native tracheae, whereas single interrupted sutures revealed a considerably lower stability under burden. Therefore, the continuous suture is of advantage in respect of the mechanical strain from traction and the suture protection of tracheal anastomoses. Further studies with differing survival times in vivo with this method provide insight into the stability of tracheal anastomoses during the healing process.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.