This study examines the potential value of liver oxygenation as a predictor of early graft function, pO2 measurements were performed on 10 pairs of beagle (donor) and foxhound (recipient) dogs during pentobarbital anesthesis. Two different explantation techniques were used: complete preparation and dissection before perfusion and explantation (group A) or rapid perfusion and explantation with detailed preparation of the liver and dissection of vessels ex situ after explantation (group B). In both groups, the technique of liver perfusion with 1,000 ml arterial and 500 ml portovenous application of ice-cold UW solution was equal. Local oxygen partial pressure values were obtained polarographically with miniaturized needle electrodes. The liver oxygenation directly after laparotomy was comparable in both groups (median values around 54 mm Hg). Prior to the infusion of UW solution, a reduction of the tissue oxygenation values to 24 mm Hg was observed in group A (p < 0.01 compared to postlaparotomy values). In group B, limited preexplantation surgical dissection resulted in a reduced pO2 decline to 42 mm Hg (n.s.). After transplantation, the reduced tissue oxygenation persisted in the livers of the dogs which were completely dissected in situ (group B) as compared to the preexplantation recipient and the donor liver before instrumentation (p < 0.01). In contrast, rapidly perfused livers again exhibited only an insignificant reduction of tissue oxygenation following transplantation. Survival correlated linearly with the liver oxygenation within the observation time after transplantation (p < 0.01). A significant survival advantage was found for the rapid perfusion technique (p < 0.05). We conclude that the tissue oxygenation might provide valuable information on early graft function.

Keywords:
Liver transplantation, Liver oxygenation, Predictor, Dog
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.