Background: Given the high contribution of stroke to the global burden of disease, there is a need for good-quality information on Web platforms such as Wikipedia. Aims: This study aimed to describe the quality of the Wikipedia articles on stroke written in different languages. Methods: We studied the world’s 30 most spoken languages. With the DISCERN score, we evaluated the quality of the information within the Wikipedia articles. Three investigators assessed each of the texts translated to English. We also registered the word count, the number of references, and if the text referred to the emergency status of stroke, cues to suspect a stroke, and allusions to endovascular treatment. Results: There is a Wikipedia article for stroke in 23 out of the 30 languages. The mean DISCERN score was 35 29.9 ± 9.2. Overall quality ranged from 3/5 in 26.1% to 1/5 in 17.4%. Word count had a mean of 36 3,145.8 ± 3,048.9 words, and the texts included a mean of 43.1 ± 57.3 references; 69.6% of the articles referred to stroke as a medical emergency, 52.2% included awareness symptoms, and 34.8% included endovascular management among the stroke treatments. Three pages included steroids as part of the stroke treatment. The DISCERN score was not correlated with the number of speakers, but it was positively correlated with the number of references (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and the number of words (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) in the articles. Conclusion: The analyzed Wikipedia articles do not contain relevant and up-to-date information to the general population. Further, the content varies widely across the different languages and is missing for some of them. The missing versions disproportionally affect millions of potential information seekers in undeveloped countries.

1.
Ducrot
P
,
Montagni
I
,
Nguyen Thanh
V
,
Serry
AJ
,
Richard
JB
.
Evolution of online health-related information seeking in France from 2010 to 2017: results from nationally representative surveys
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2021
;
23
(
4
):
e18799
.
2.
Chrzanowski
J
,
Sołek
J
,
Fendler
W
,
Jemielniak
D
.
Assessing public interest based on Wikipedia’s most visited medical articles during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: search trends analysis
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2021
;
23
(
4
):
e26331
.
3.
Shafee
T
,
Masukume
G
,
Kipersztok
L
,
Das
D
,
Häggström
M
,
Heilman
J
.
Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
.
J Epidemiol Community Health
.
2017
;
71
(
11
):
1122
9
.
4.
Brigo
F
,
Igwe
SC
,
Nardone
R
,
Lochner
P
,
Tezzon
F
,
Otte
WM
.
Wikipedia and neurological disorders
.
J Clin Neurosci
.
2015
;
22
(
7
):
1170
2
.
5.
Rutovic
S
,
Fumagalli
AI
,
Lutsenko
I
,
Corea
F
.
Public interest in neurological diseases on wikipedia during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic
.
Neurol Int
.
2021
;
13
(
1
):
59
63
.
6.
What are the top 200 most spoken languages?
2021
[cited 2021 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/ethnologue200.
7.
Charnock
D
,
Shepperd
S
.
Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting
.
Health Educ Res
.
2004
;
19
(
4
):
440
6
. .
8.
Jemielniak
D
.
Wikipedia: why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?
Gigascience
.
2019
;
8
(
12
):
giz139
. .
9.
Bach
RL
,
Wenz
A
.
Studying health-related internet and mobile device use using web logs and smartphone records
.
PLoS One
.
2020
;
15
(
6
):
e0234663
. .
10.
Aguilar-Morales
K
,
Aguirre-Suarez
G
,
Bowles
B
,
Lee
A
,
Lansingh
VC
.
Wikipedia, friend or foe regarding information on diabetic retinopathy? A content analysis in the world's leading 19 languages
.
PLoS One
.
2021
;
16
(
10
):
e0258246
.
11.
Rutovic
S
,
Volevach
E
,
Maršálková
H
,
Fumagalli
AI
,
Corea
F
.
What the aftermath of the global pandemic will mean for neurologists
.
Neurol Int
.
2021
;
13
(
3
):
297
303
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.