Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of action observation therapy (AOT) on apraxia of speech (AOS) in patients after stroke. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients diagnosed with AOS after stroke were randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 21) and a control group (n = 21). Both groups received 30 min of conventional language therapy twice daily, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The patients in the experimental group additionally received 20 min of AOT before 10 min language therapy each day. The speech function and aphasia severity of the 2 groups were assessed using the speech apraxia assessment method of the China Rehabilitation Research Center, Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination before and after treatment. Results: AOS and WAB scores increased significantly after treatment in both groups (p < 0.05). AOS and WAB scores exhibited significant differences between the experimental group and the control group after training (p < 0.05). The response rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: AOT based on mirror neuron theory may improve language function in patients with AOS after stroke.

1.
Inatomi Y, Yonehara T, Omiya S, Hashimoto Y, Hirano T, Uchino M. Aphasia during the acute phase in ischemic stroke.
Cerebrovasc Dis
. 2008;25(4):316–23.
2.
Kadojić D, Bijelić BR, Radanović R, Porobić M, Rimac J, Dikanović M. Aphasia in patients with ischemic stroke.
Acta Clin Croat
. 2012 Jun;51(2):221–5.
3.
Ryglewicz D, Hier DB, Wiszniewska M, Cichy S, Lechowicz W, Czlonkowska A. Ischemic strokes are more severe in Poland than in the United States.
Neurology
. 2000 Jan;54(2):513–5.
4.
Ee CH, Kwan PE, Tan ES. Stroke rehabilitation of elderly patients in Singapore.
Singapore Med J
. 1991 Feb;32(1):55–60.
5.
Gialanella B, Bertolinelli M, Lissi M, Prometti P. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of aphasia.
Disabil Rehabil
. 2011;33(2):122–9.
6.
Ballard KJ, Wambaugh JL, Duffy JR, Layfield C, Maas E, Mauszycki S, et al. Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: A Systematic Review of Intervention Research Between 2004 and 2012.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol
. 2015 May;24(2):316–37.
7.
Duffy JR.
Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management
. 3rd ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2013.
8.
McNeil MR, Robin DA, Schmidt RA. Apraxia of speech. In: McNeil MR, editor.
Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders
. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Thieme; 2009. pp. 249–68.
9.
di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study.
Exp Brain Res
. 1992;91(1):176–80.
10.
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex.
Brain
. 1996 Apr;119(Pt 2):593–609.
11.
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res
. 1996 Mar;3(2):131–41.
12.
Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation.
Cogn Behav Neurol
. 2006 Mar;19(1):55–63.
13.
Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system.
Annu Rev Neurosci
. 2004;27(1):169–92.
14.
Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.
Science
. 1999 Dec;286(5449):2526–8.
15.
Nishitani N, Hari R. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
. 2000 Jan;97(2):913–8.
16.
Koski L, Wohlschläger A, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau MC, Mazziotta JC, et al. Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions.
Cereb Cortex
. 2002 Aug;12(8):847–55.
17.
Buccino G, Vogt S, Ritzl A, Fink GR, Zilles K, Freund HJ, et al. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study.
Neuron
. 2004 Apr;42(2):323–34.
18.
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. 
Nat Rev Neurosci
. 2001 Sep;2(9):661–70.
19.
Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DM, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror.
Lancet
. 1999 Jun;353(9169):2035–6.
20.
Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A, Binkofski F, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke.
Neuroimage
. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T164–73.
21.
Dohle C, Püllen J, Nakaten A, Küst J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair
. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):209–17.
22.
Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, Sale P, Mancuso M, Buccino G. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
. 2010 Dec;46(4):517–23.
23.
Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A. The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke.
Dev Psychobiol
. 2012 Apr;54(3):293–310.
24.
Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study.
Eur J Neurosci
. 2002 Jan;15(2):399–402.
25.
Tettamanti M, Buccino G, Saccuman MC, Gallese V, Danna M, Scifo P, et al. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.
J Cogn Neurosci
. 2005 Feb;17(2):273–81.
26.
Ross LA, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt VM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments.
Cereb Cortex
. 2007 May;17(5):1147–53.
27.
Gentilucci M, Dalla Volta R. Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
. 2008 Jun;61(6):944–57.
28.
Hanlon RE, Brown JW, Gerstman LJ. Enhancement of naming in nonfluent aphasia through gesture.
Brain Lang
. 1990 Feb;38(2):298–314.
29.
Raymer AM, Singletary F, Rodriguez A, Ciampitti M, Heilman KM, Rothi LJ. Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc
. 2006 Nov;12(6):867–82.
30.
Rodriguez A, Raymer AM, Rothi LJ. Effects of gestural+verbal and semantic-phonologic treatments for verb retrieval in aphasia.
Aphasiology
. 2006;20(2-4):286–97.
31.
Rose M, Douglas J. The differential facilitatory effect of ges-ture and visualization processes on object naming in aphasia.
Aphasiology
. 2001;15(10-11):977–90.
32.
Rose M, Douglas J, Matyas T. The comparative effectiveness of gesture and verbal treatments for specific phonologic naming impairment.
Aphasiology
. 2002;16(10-11):1001–30.
33.
Chen W, Ye Q, Ji X, Zhang S, Yang X, Zhou Q, et al. Mirror neuron system based therapy for aphasia rehabilitation.
Front Psychol
. 2015 Oct 30;6:1665.
34.
Square PA, Martin RE. The Nature and Treatment of Neuro-Motor Speech Disorders in Aphasia [M]// Chapey R. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984. pp. 467–99.
35.
Dabul BL.
Apraxia battery for adults
. Austin (Tex): Pro-ed; 2000.
36.
Li S.
Speech therapy
[M]Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2008. p. 219.
37.
Wang Y. The introduction of Western Battery of Aphasia.
Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract
. 1997a;3:87–9.
38.
Wang Y. The introduction of Western Battery of Aphasia.
Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract
. 1997b;3:135–40.
39.
Zhang T, Li LL, Bi S, Mei YW, Xie RM, Luo ZM, et al. [Effects of three-stage rehabilitation treatment on acute cerebrovascular diseases: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
. 2004 Dec;84(23):1948–54.
40.
Maassen B. Issues contrasting adult acquired versus developmental apraxia of speech.
Semin Speech Lang
. 2002 Nov;23(4):257–66.
41.
Wambaugh JL, Duffy JR, McNeil MR, Robin DA, Rogers MA. Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence.
J Med Speech Lang Pathol
. 2006a;14(2):xxxv–ixvii.
42.
Wambaugh JL, Duffy JR, McNeil MR, Robin DA, Rogers MA. Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: Treatment descriptions and recommendations.
J Med Speech Lang Pathol
. 2006;14: xxxv–ixvii.
43.
Marangolo P, Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, Craighero L, Coccia M, Altoè G, et al. Improving language without words: first evidence from aphasia.
Neuropsychologia
. 2010 Nov;48(13):3824–33.
44.
Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, Altoè G, Ceravolo MG, Provinciali L, Marangolo P. Action observation as a useful approach for enhancing recovery of verb production: new evidence from aphasia.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
. 2013 Aug;49(4):473–81.
45.
Wambaugh JL, West JE, Doyle PJ. Treatment for apraxia of speech: effects of targeting sound groups.
Aphasialogy
. 1998;12(7):731–43.
46.
Dronkers NF. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.
Nature
. 1996 Nov;384(6605):159–61.
47.
Hillis AE, Work M, Barker PB, Jacobs MA, Breese EL, Maurer K. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation.
Brain
. 2004 Jul;127(Pt 7):1479–87.
48.
Peach RK, Tonkovich JD. Phonemic characteristics of apraxia of speech resulting from subcortical hemorrhage.
J Commun Disord
. 2004 Jan-Feb;37(1):77–90.
49.
Ogar J, Willock S, Baldo J, Wilkins D, Ludy C, Dronkers N. Clinical and anatomical correlates of apraxia of speech.
Brain Lang
. 2006 Jun;97(3):343–50.
50.
Fazio P, Cantagallo A, Craighero L, D’Ausilio A, Roy AC, Pozzo T, et al. Encoding of human action in Broca’s area.
Brain
. 2009 Jul;132(Pt 7):1980–8.
51.
Toni I, de Lange FP, Noordzij ML, Hagoort P. Language beyond action.
J Physiol Paris
. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):71–9.
52.
Ertelt D, Binkofski F. Action observation as a tool for neurorehabilitation to moderate motor deficits and aphasia following stroke.
Neural Regen Res
. 2012 Sep;7(26):2063–74.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.