Background: Acute stroke is a medical emergency with various clinical presentations. Since the introduction of systemic thrombolytic treatment, stroke diagnosis has been made quickly and with great caution, and the trend of rapid presentation at hospitals has increased. Methods: In our multidisciplinary Emergency Department, we prospectively collected and analysed data of consecutive patients presenting with suspected acute stroke (SAS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Results: Four hundred ten patients (200 men, mean age 68 ± 16, range 17-93 years) with SAS were admitted of which 105 were prehospitally announced as within the time-window for thrombolytic treatment (TW). Diagnosis of acute stroke/TIA was retained in 147 (35.9%). The initially reported TW <4.5 h was wrong in 35.3%. Thrombolysis was performed in 27 patients (23.5% of ischemic stroke patients; 6.6% of all SAS). Diagnosis of another neurologic disease was made in 62 (15.1%). Major differential diagnoses came from the field of internal medicine, psychiatry or otorhinolaryngology. One hundred fifty patients (36.6%) were rapidly discharged. Conclusion: About half the number of our patients admitted for SAS did not suffer from an acute neurologic disease. Residual symptoms post-stroke might be partly responsible for initial misinterpretation. The crucial difference between symptom onset and symptom recognition needs to be emphasized to improve the prehospital assessment of the TW.

1.
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The national institute of neurological disorders and stroke rt-PA stroke study group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-1587.
2.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al: Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317-1329.
3.
Bray JE, Martin J, Cooper G, Barger B, Bernard S, Bladin C: Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne ambulance stroke screen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:28-33.
4.
Bray JE, Johnson R, Trobbiani K, et al: Australian public's awareness of stroke warning signs improves after national multimedia campaigns. Stroke 2013;44:3540-3543.
5.
Saver JL: Time is brain - quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263-266.
6.
Förster A, Griebe M, Wolf ME, Szabo K, Hennerici MG, Kern R: How to identify stroke mimics in patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis? J Neurol 2012;259:1347-1353.
7.
Hand PJ, Kwan J, Lindley RI, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM: Distinguishing between stroke and mimic at the bedside: the brain attack study. Stroke 2006;37:769-775.
8.
Tsivgoulis G, Alexandrov AV, Chang J, et al: Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: a 6-year, single-care center study and a pooled analysis of reported series. Stroke 2011;42:1771-1774.
9.
Zinkstok SM, Engelter ST, Gensicke H, et al: Safety of thrombolysis in stroke mimics: results from a multicenter cohort study. Stroke 2013;44:1080-1084.
10.
Nadarajan V, Perry RJ, Johnson J, Werring DJ: Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2014;14:23-31.
11.
Prabhakaran S, Ruff I, Bernstein RA: Acute stroke intervention: a systematic review. JAMA 2015;313:1451-1462.
12.
Thomalla G, Fiebach JB, Østergaard L, et al: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-based thrombolysis in wake-up stroke (wake-up). Int J Stroke 2014;9:829-836.
13.
Caceres JA, Adil MM, Jadhav V, et al: Diagnosis of stroke by emergency medical dispatchers and its impact on the prehospital care of patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:e610-e614.
14.
Brandler ES, Sharma M, Sinert RH, Levine SR: Prehospital stroke scales in urban environments: a systematic review. Neurology 2014;82:2241-2249.
15.
Brandler ES, Sharma M, McCullough F, et al: Prehospital stroke identification: factors associated with diagnostic accuracy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:2161-2166.
16.
Berglund A, Svensson L, Wahlgren N, von Euler M; HASTA Collaborators: Face arm speech time test use in the prehospital setting, better in the ambulance than in the emergency medical communication center. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;37:212-216.
17.
Oostema JA, Konen J, Chassee T, Nasiri M, Reeves MJ: Clinical predictors of accurate prehospital stroke recognition. Stroke 2015;46:1513-1517.
18.
Fischer CE, Barnung S, Nielsen SL, Rasmussen LS: Prehospital identification of stroke - room for improvement. Eur J Neurol 2008;15:792-796.
19.
Karliński M, Gluszkiewicz M, Członkowska A: The accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular accidents: an observational study. Arch Med Sci 2015;11:530-535.
20.
Yperzeele L, Van Hooff RJ, De Smedt A, et al: Prehospital stroke care: limitations of current interventions and focus on new developments. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;38:1-9.
21.
Goldstein LB, Simel DL: Is this patient having a stroke? JAMA 2005;293:2391-2402.
22.
Wolf ME, Szabo K, Griebe M, et al: Clinical and MRI characteristics of acute migrainous infarction. Neurology 2011;76:1911-1917.
23.
Mohan KM, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG, Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Grieve AP: Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2011;42:1489-1494.
24.
Wesley K, Wesley K: Stroke savvy. The accuracy of EMS-reported last known normal times. JEMS 2014;39:27.
25.
Curfman D, Connor LT, Moy HP, et al: Accuracy of emergency medical services-reported last known normal times in patients suspected with acute stroke. Stroke 2014;45:1275-1279.
26.
Rizos T, Ringleb PA, Huttner HB, Kohrmann M, Juttler E: Evolution of stroke diagnosis in the emergency room - a prospective observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:448-453.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.