Background: Suffering a stroke has major implications for the patient. To understand human suffering, one should understand society. Pirandello described society as a higher entity than the individual, thereby justifying human adaptability to society. We explore a qualitative finding that suggests that social trends may influence how stroke patients prioritize aspects of their rehabilitation. Methods: We compare a contemporary patient’s experience of stroke recovery with that of a fictional character from the works of Luigi Pirandello. Both patients had two main residual symptoms: hemiparesis and aphasia. Results: The rehabilitation priorities of the two patients differed, and appeared to reflect the contemporaneous demands of society. Mobility was prioritized in 1910; communication was prioritized in 2010. However, essential aspects of ‘being a stroke patient’ remained unchanged; both patients retained a sense of self and both coped emotionally by being hopeful. Conclusions: We conclude that stroke patients respond to society’s contemporaneous demands and expectations. Currently, society demands participation in a large social environment and this is reflected in stroke patients’ priorities. This analogy could enable medical professionals to better understand the social impact of stroke, and consequently offer appropriate interventions to improve rehabilitation outcomes for individual patients.

Keywords:
Stroke, Rehabilitation, Humanities, Narrative, Social participation, Behavior
1.
Pirandello L: La toccatina; in Pirandello L (ed): Novelle per un Anno. Milano, Collana I Meridiani, 1985, pp 112–136.
2.
Cumming TB, Thrift AG, Collier JM, Churilov L, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Bernhardt J: Very early mobilization after stroke fast-tracks return to walking: further results from the phase II AVERT randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2011;42:59–64.
3.
Pellegrino ED: Philosophy of medicine: problematic and potential. J Med Philos 1976;1:5–31.
4.
Sghirlanzoni A, Pareyson D: ‘La toccatina’: polyglottal aphasia in Pirandello. Ital J Neurol Sci 1997;18:55–57.
5.
Bolte Taylor J: My Stroke Insight: a Brain Scientist’s Personal Journey. New York, Plume books, 2009.
6.
Koehler P: About medicine and the arts: Charcot and French literature at the fin-de-siècle. J Hist Neurosci 2001;10:27–40.
7.
Engel GL: The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–136.
8.
Jackson JH: Remarks on dissolution of the nervous system as exemplified by certain post-epileptic conditions. Med Press Circular 1881;35:399–402.
9.
Cupp J, Simmons Z, Berg A, Felgoise SH, Walsh SM, Stephens HE: Psychological health is maintained as physical function declines. Amyotr Lateral Sci 2011;12:290–296.
10.
Donohoe JE: To what extent can response shift theory explain the variation in prostate cancer patients’ reactions to treatment side-effects? A review. Qual Life Res 2011;20:161–167.
11.
Frank A: The Wounded Story teller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995.
12.
Brody H: Types of stories about sickness; in Brody H (ed): Stories of Sickness. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 85–93.
13.
Brodal A: Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 1973;96:675–694.
14.
Hjelmblink F, Holmstrom I: To cope with uncertainty: stroke patients’ use of temporal models in narratives. Scand J Caring Sci 2006;20:367–374.
15.
Bassanese FA: The International Provincial; in: Understanding Luigi Pirandello. South Carolina, University of South Carolina Press, 1997, pp 1–22.
16.
Proust A: Des Différentes Formes de Ramollissement du Cerveau. Paris, Asselin, successeur de Béchet Jeune et Labé, Librairie de la Faculté de Médecine, 1866.
17.
Bogousslavsky J, Paciaroni M: Did Jean-Martin Charcot contribute to stroke? Eur Neurol 2010;64:27–32.
18.
Paciaroni M, Bogousslavsky J: How did stroke become of interest to neurologists? Neurology 2009;73:724–728.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.