In spatial neglect, the pathological ipsilesional deviation of the subjective straight ahead (SSA) received both ‘translational’ and ‘rotational’ interpretations. Furthermore, hemianopia per se could also influence straight-ahead (SA) perception. Here, we aimed at disentangling the relative effects of neglect and hemianopia on the SSA by using a method analyzing translation and rotation in parallel. We included patients with a right hemisphere stroke. Ten had neglect and hemianopia, 6 neglect only, 3 hemianopia only, and 12 neither one nor the other. 15 were controls. Participants had to adjust a bar, movable in translation and rotation, SA of the navel, in darkness. Patients with spatial neglect showed systematic rightward translation, greater when hemianoptic. The rotation component appeared more variable and was influenced by the presence of a visual field defect, as most of the patients with hemianopia showed an anticlockwise rotation and most of the patients without hemianopia a clockwise rotation. Non-neglect patients and control subjects demonstrated a fair performance level. In conclusion, both neglect and hemianopia resulted in a translation error of the SSA to the ipsilesional side. In neglect patients, additional hemianopia resulted in a counterclockwise rotation. Furthermore, rotation and translation errors appeared dissociated, suggesting a different coding of these dimensions by the right posterior hemisphere.

Keywords:
Spatial neglect, Hemianopia, Subjective straight ahead
1.
Jeannerod M, Biguer B: Référence égocentrique et espace représenté. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1989;45:635–639.
2.
Andersen RA: Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1995;5:457–469.
3.
Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J: Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 1997;20:303–330.
4.
Heilman KM, Bowers D, Watson RT: Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 1983;33:661–664.
5.
Sarri M, Greenwood R, Kalra L, Papps B, Husain M, Driver J: Prism adaptation after effects in stroke patients with spatial neglect: pathological effects on subjective straight ahead but not visual open-loop pointing. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:1069–1080.
6.
Ferber S, Karnath HO: Parietal and occipital lobe contributions to perception of straight ahead orientation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:572–578.
7.
Vallar G, Guariglia C, Nico D, Bisiach E: Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain 1995;118:467–472.
8.
Richard C, Rousseaux M, Saj A, Honoré J: Straight ahead in spatial neglect. Evidence that space is shifted, not rotated. Neurology 2004;63:2136–2138.
9.
Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A: Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 1982;105:543–552.
10.
Rousseaux M, Beis JM, Pradat-Diehl P, et al: Batterie de dépistage de la négligence spatiale. Normes et effets de l’âge, du niveau d’éducation, du sexe, de la main et de la latéralité. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2001;157:1385–1400.
11.
Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET: Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurological impairment. Neurology 1980;30:509–517.
12.
Ogden JA: Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect. Brain Cogn 1985;4:59–75.
13.
Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y: The Bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1989;11:49–53.
14.
Rorden C, Brett M: Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000;12:191–200.
15.
Bartolomeo P, Chokron S: Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial bias after right hemisphere lesions. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:881–894.
16.
Richard C, Honoré J, Bernati T, Rousseaux M: Straight-ahead pointing correlates with long-line bisection in neglect patients. Cortex 2004;40:75–83.
17.
Doricchi F, Angelelli P: Misrepresentation of horizontal space in left unilateral neglect: role of hemianopia. Neurology 1999;52:1845–1852.
18.
Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Figliozzi F, Magnotti L, Gabriele G: Retinotopic modulation of space misrepresentation in unilateral neglect: evidence from quandrantanopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:116–119.
19.
Doricchi F: The contribution of retinotopic and multimodal coding of space to horizontal space misrepresentation in neglect and hemianopia; in Karnath HO, Milner D, Vallar G (eds): The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp 203–204.
20.
Farné A, Ponti F, Ladavas E: In search of biased egocentric reference frames in neglect. Neuropsychologia 1998;36:611–623.
21.
Kerkhoff G: Multimodal spatial orientation deficits in left-sided visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:1387–1405.
22.
Saj A, Honoré J, Bernati T, Coello Y, Rousseaux M: Subjective visual vertical in pitch and roll after right hemisphere stroke. Stroke 2005;36:588–591.
23.
Pérennou D, Amblard B, Laassel el M, Pélissier J: Hemispheric asymmetry in the vertical contribution to postural control in healthy adults. Neuroreport 1997;8:3137–3141.
24.
Rode G, Tiliket C, Charlopain P, Boisson D: Postural asymmetry reduction by vestibular caloric stimulation in left hemiparetic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:9–14.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.