Objective: Mirror movements (MMs) are a phenomenon of involuntary movements that accompany physically intended movements of the opposite side of the body. In the current study, we investigated the clinical characteristics and cortical activation patterns of MMs in patients with corona radiata (CR) infarct, using functional MRI. Subjects and Methods: We recruited 31 consecutive hemiparetic stroke patients with CR infarct. Functional MRI was performed to verify brain activation patterns during grasp-release movements of the affected hand, and MM of the unaffected hand was observed simultaneously. Results: The prevalence of MMs was 54.8% (17 out of 31 patients), and the intensity of MMs ranged from mild to moderate. The severity of MM in the unaffected hand is closely related to the poor motor function of the affected upper extremity and to activations of the unaffected motor cortex and both supplementary motor areas (SMAs) during the movement of the affected hand. In addition, the activations of unaffected motor cortex and both SMAs were closely related to poor motor function of the affected upper extremity. Conclusions: The results suggest that MMs, poor motor function, and the activations of ipsilateral motor cortex and both SMAs are closely interconnected in patients with CR infarct.

1.
Carson RG: Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005;49:641–662.
2.
Connolly K, Stratton P: Developmental changes in associated movements. Dev Med Child Neurol 1968;10:49–56.
3.
Espay AJ, Li JY, Johnston L, Chen R, Lang AE: Mirror movements in parkinsonism: evaluation of a new clinical sign. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1355–1358.
4.
Green JB: An electromyographic study of mirror movements. Neurology 1967;17:91–94.
5.
Nelles G, Cramer SC, Schaechter JD, Kaplan JD, Finklestein SP: Quantitative assessment of mirror movements after stroke. Stroke 1998;29:1182–1187.
6.
Aranyi Z, Rosler KM: Effort-induced mirror movements. A study of transcallosal inhibition in humans. Exp Brain Res 2002;145:76–82.
7.
Mayston MJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA: A neurophysiological study of mirror movements in adults and children. Ann Neurol 1999;45:583–594.
8.
Schott GD, Wyke MA: Obligatory bimanual associated movements. Report of a non- familial case in an otherwise normal left-handed boy. J Neurol Sci 1977;33:301–312.
9.
Daly JJ, Hrovat K, Pundik S, Sunshine J, Yue G: fMRI methods for proximal upper limb joint motor testing and identification of undesired mirror movement after stroke. J Neurosci Methods 2008;175:133–142.
10.
Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Evans AL, Stephens JA: Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Brain 1993;116:1223–1247.
11.
Cincotta M, Borgheresi A, Balestrieri F, Giovannelli F, Ragazzoni A, Vanni P, Benvenuti F, Zaccara G, Ziemann U: Mechanisms underlying mirror movements in Parkinson’s disease: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Mov Disord 2006;21:1019–1025.
12.
Fisher CM: Alien hand phenomena: a review with the addition of six personal cases. Can J Neurol Sci 2000;27:192–203.
13.
Georgiou-Karistianis N, Hoy KE, Bradshaw JL, Farrow M, Chiu E, Churchyard A, Fitzgerald PB, Armatas CA: Motor overflow in Huntington’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:904–906.
14.
Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, Byun WM, Son S, Ahn SH: Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2003;14:1329–1332.
15.
Luft AR, Forrester L, Macko RF, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Villagra F, Hanley DF: Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 2005;26:184–194.
16.
Ottaviani D, Tiple D, Suppa A, Colosimo C, Fabbrini G, Cincotta M, Defazio G, Berardelli A: Mirror movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008;23:253–258.
17.
Werhahn KJ, Conforto AB, Kadom N, Hallett M, Cohen LG: Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2003;54:464–472.
18.
Rocca MA, Mezzapesa DM, Comola M, Leocani L, Falini A, Gatti R, Mammi S, Comi G, Filippi M: Persistence of congenital mirror movements after hemiplegic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:831–834.
19.
Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113.
20.
Woods BT, Teuber HL: Mirror movements after childhood hemiparesis. Neurology 1978;28:1152–1157.
21.
Cramer SC, Moore CI, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR: A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke 2000;31:668–671.
22.
Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Zhu XH, Ugurbil K, Kim SG, Ashe J: Effects of movement predictability on cortical motor activation. Neurosci Res 1998;32:65–74.
23.
Jang SH, Cho SH, Kim YH, Kwon YH, Byun WM, Lee SJ, Park SM, Chang CH: Cortical activation changes associated with motor recovery in patients with precentral knob infarct. Neuroreport 2004;15:395–399.
24.
Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E: Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980;19:382–389.
25.
Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL: Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing 2000;29:223–228.
26.
Miyamoto S, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y, Michimata A, Izumi S: Reliability and validity of the manual function test in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88:247–255.
27.
Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, Fraser C, Lemon RN: Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:316–328.
28.
Cincotta M, Borgheresi A, Balzini L, Vannucchi L, Zeloni G, Ragazzoni A, Benvenuti F, Zaccara G, Arnetoli G, Ziemann U: Separate ipsilateral and contralateral corticospinal projections in congenital mirror movements: neurophysiological evidence and significance for motor rehabilitation. Mov Disord 2003;18:1294–1300.
29.
Leinsinger GL, Heiss DT, Jassoy AG, Pfluger T, Hahn K, Danek A: Persistent mirror movements: functional MR imaging of the hand motor cortex. Radiology 1997;203:545–552.
30.
Jang SH: A review of the ipsilateral motor pathway as a recovery mechanism in patients with stroke. Neurorehabilitation 2009;24:315–320.
31.
Kim YH, Jang SH, Byun WM, Han BS, Lee KH, Ahn SH: Ipsilateral motor pathway confirmed by combined brain mapping of a patient with hemiparetic stroke: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1351–1353.
32.
Netz J, Lammers T, Homberg V: Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997;120:1579–1586.
33.
Serrien DJ, Strens LH, Cassidy MJ, Thompson AJ, Brown P: Functional significance of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement of the affected hand after stroke. Exp Neurol 2004;190:425–432.
34.
Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS: Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003;126:1430–1448.
35.
Stoeckel MC, Binkofski F: The role of ipsilateral primary motor cortex in movement control and recovery from brain damage. Exp Neurol 2010;221:13–17.
36.
Wittenberg GF, Bastian AJ, Dromerick AW, Thach WT, Powers WJ: Mirror movements complicate interpretation of cerebral activation changes during recovery from subcortical infarction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000;14:213–221.
37.
Addamo PK, Farrow M, Hoy KE, Bradshaw JL, Georgiou-Karistianis N: The effects of age and attention on motor overflow production – a review. Brain Res Rev 2007;54:189–204.
38.
Aramaki Y, Honda M, Sadato N: Suppression of the non-dominant motor cortex during bimanual symmetric finger movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 2006;141:2147–2153.
39.
Armatas CA, Summers JJ, Bradshaw JL: Handedness and performance variability as factors influencing mirror movement occurrence. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996;18:823–835.
40.
Baliz Y, Armatas C, Farrow M, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB, Bradshaw JL, Georgiou-Karistianis N: The influence of attention and age on the occurrence of mirror movements. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005;11:855–862.
41.
Bodwell JA, Mahurin RK, Waddle S, Price R, Cramer SC: Age and features of movement influence motor overflow. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1735–1739.
42.
Chen R, Gerloff C, Hallett M, Cohen LG: Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities. Ann Neurol 1997;41:247–254.
43.
Cramer SC, Weisskoff RM, Schaechter JD, Nelles G, Foley M, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR: Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;16:197–205.
44.
Uttner I, Kraft E, Nowak DA, Muller F, Philipp J, Zierdt A, Hermsdorfer J: Mirror movements and the role of handedness: isometric grip forces changes. Motor Control 2007;11:16–28.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.