Background: The new definition of a transient ischemic attack (TIA) makes it more difficult to distinguish it from an inhibitory seizure (IS). Purpose: The present study compares the characteristics of patients with an IS to those with a TIA, taking into account the old and the new definition of a TIA. Patients and Methods: The clinical characteristics and the electroencephalogram (EEG) findings of 25 patients with an IS were compared to 252 patients with a TIA according to the old definition. Subgroups of 10 patients with an IS without structural lesions and 195 TIA patients according to the new definition were also analyzed. The differential diagnostic clues were examined. Results: Differences in age, gender distribution and vascular risk factors were observed only when comparing the overall patient groups. However, these differences disappeared when the subgroups were analyzed. Temporary speech disturbance, associated with some partial amnesia for the event, was the most common clinical presentation of an IS. Additionally, specific and nonspecific postictal EEG abnormalities were observed in the majority of the IS patients, while the EEG was normal in more than 90% of the TIA patients. Conclusions: An IS must be suspected in a patient with a short temporary speech disturbance and partial amnesia for the event. In view of the new definition of a TIA, urgent EEG becomes mandatory in each patient with a brief episode of neurological dysfunction.

1.
Fisher CM: Transient paralytic attacks of obscure nature: the question of non-convulsive seizure paralysis. Can J Neurol Sci 1978;5:267–273.
2.
Carreño M: Recognition of nonepileptic events. Semin Neurol 2008;28:297–304.
3.
Caplan LR: Transient ischemic attack: definition and natural history. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2006;8:276–280.
4.
Schulz UG, Briley D, Meagher T, Molyneux A, Rothwell PM: Abnormalities on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging performed several weeks after a minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:734–738.
5.
Mlynash M, Olivot JM, Tong DC, Lansberg MG, Eyngorn I, Kemp S, Moseley ME, Albers GW: Yield of combined perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in hemispheric TIA. Neurology 2009;72:1127–1133.
6.
Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, Fayad PD, Mohr JP, Saver JL, Sherman DG; TIA Working Group: Transient ischemic attack – proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1713–1716.
7.
Saver JL: Proposal for a universal definition of cerebral infarction. Stroke 2008;39:3110–3115.
8.
Rancurel G: Transient ischemic attack in the elderly: new definition and diagnostic difficulties (in French). Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 2005;3:17–26.
9.
Grand’Maison F, Reiher J, Lebel ML, Rivest J: Transient anosognosia for episodic hemiparesis: a singular manifestation of TIAs and epileptic seizures. Can J Neurol Sci 1989;16:203–205.
10.
Cocito L, Loeb C: Focal epilepsy as a possible sign of transient subclinical ischemia. Eur Neurol 1989;29:339–344.
11.
Lee H, Lerner A: Transient inhibitory seizures mimicking crescendo TIAs. Neurology 1990;40:165–166.
12.
Kaplan PW: Focal seizures resembling transient ischemic attacks due to subclinical ischemia. Cerebrovasc Dis 1993;3:241–243.
13.
Primavera A, Giberti L, Cocito L: Focal inhibitory seizure as presenting sign of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ital J Neurol Sci 1993;14:381–384.
14.
Erdem S, Savqi S, Ciger A, Selekler K: Seizures with negative phenomena. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1995;97:36–38.
15.
Ferraci F, Moretto G, Gentile M, Kuo P, Carnevale A: Can seizures be the only manifestation of transient ischemic attacks? A report of four cases. Neurol Sci 2000;21:2303–2306.
16.
Baquis GD, Pessin MS, Scott RM: Limb shaking – a carotid TIA. Stroke 1985;16:444–448.
17.
Shulz UG, Rothwell PM: Transient ischaemic attacks mimicking focal motor seizures. Postgrad Med J 2002;78:246–247.
18.
Ali S, Khan MA, Khealani B: Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks: case report and review of the literature. BMC Neurol 2006;6:1–5.
19.
De Reuck J, De Groote L, Van Maele G: Delayed transient worsening of neurological deficits after ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:22–27.
20.
R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2007.
21.
Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT: Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota: 1935–1984. Epilepsia 1993;34:453–468.
22.
De Reuck J, Proot P, Van Maele G: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a risk factor for stroke-related seizures. Eur J Neurol 2007;14:989–992.
23.
Globus M, Lavi E, Fich A, Abramsky O: Ictal hemiparesis. Eur Neurol 1982;21:165–168.
24.
Abou-Khalil B, Fakhoury T, Jennings M, Moots P, Warner J, Kessler RM: Inhibitory motor seizures: correlation with centroparietal structural and functional abnormalities. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:103–108.
25.
Smith RF, Devinsky O, Luciano D: Inhibitory motor status: two new cases and a review of inhibitory motor seizures. J Epil 1997;10:15–21.
26.
Racy A, Osborn MA, Vern BA, Molinari GF: Epileptic aphasia: first onset of prolonged monosymptomatic status epilepticus in adults. Arch Neurol 1980;37:419–422.
27.
Dinner DS, Lueders H, Lederman R, Gretter TE: Aphasic status epilepticus: a case report. Neurology 1981;31:888–891.
28.
Primavera A, Bo GP, Venturi S: Aphasic status epilepticus. Eur Neurol 1988;28:255–257.
29.
Thomas P, Kullmann B, Chatel M: Status epilepticus with aphasic manifestation. Rev Neurol 1991;147:246–250.
30.
Cascino GD, Westmoreland BF, Swanson TH, Sharbrough FW: Seizure-associated speech arrest in elderly patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66:254–258.
31.
Grimes DA, Guberman A: De novo aphasic status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1997;38:945–949.
32.
DeToledo JC, Minagar A, Lowe MR: Persisting aphasia as the sole manifestation of partial status epilepticus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2000;102:144–148.
33.
Chung PW, Seo DW, Kwon JC, Kim H, Na DL: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus presenting as a subacute progressive aphasia. Seizure 2002;11:449–454.
34.
De Reuck J, Goethals M, Claeys I, Van Maele G, De Clerck M: EEG findings after a cerebral territorial infarct in patients who develop early- and late-onset seizures. Eur Neurol 2006;55:209–213.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.