Spontaneous recovery and possible fluctuation in left visual neglect, and its relation to stroke severity, basic activities of daily living (ADL) and extended ADL were examined at 10 days, at 3, 6, and 12 months after onset. Twenty-one of 56 right hemisphere stroke patients had visual neglect. Three visual neglect recovery groups were identified: continuous, fluctuating and poor recovery. We concentrated on the comparison of the continuous and the fluctuating recovery groups. At the acute phase the fluctuating recovery group had larger infarcts, more severe neglect and stroke, and a lower level of basic ADL compared to the continuous recovery group. In the continuous recovery group stable recovery was detected up to 6 months, whereas in the fluctuating recovery group recovery was incoherent in neglect and in extended ADL. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months including the evaluation of extended ADL is recommended for neglect patients due to possible fluctuation in visual neglect.

Keywords:
Recovery from stroke, Visual neglect
1.
Heilman KM, Valenstein E, Watson RT: The neglect syndrome; in Vinken PJ, et al (eds): Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1985, pp 152–183.
2.
Manly T: Rehabilitation for disorders of attention; in Wilson BA (eds): Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger, 2003, pp 23–52.
3.
Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayma H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Hemineglect in acute stroke – incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76:122–127.
4.
Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger Å, Nydevik I: Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to impairment and disability. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:215–220.
5.
Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC: Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1196–1202.
6.
Cassidy TP, Lewis S, Gray CS: Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:555–557.
7.
Katz N, Hartman-Meier A, Ring H, Soroker N: Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:379–384.
8.
Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, et al: Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;101:195–201.
9.
Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM, Harvey RL, Zhang M: Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:322–328.
10.
Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Kettunen JE: Anosognosia after stroke: assessment, occurrence, subtypes and impact on functional outcome reviewed. Acta Neurol Scand 2006;114:293–306.
11.
Small M, Ellis S: Brief remission periods in visuospatial neglect: evidence from long-term follow-up. Eur Neurol 1994;34:147–154.
12.
Levy D, Blizzard RA, Halligan PW, Stone SP: Fluctuations in visual neglect after stroke? Eur Neurol 1995;35:341–343.
13.
Ferro JM, Mariano G, Madureira S: Recovery from aphasia and neglect. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999;9:6–22.
14.
Appelros P, Nydevik I, Karlsson GM, Thorwalls A, Seiger Å: Recovery from unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:471–477.
15.
Farnè A, Buxbaum JL, Ferraro M, et al: Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1401–1410.
16.
Wade D, Wood V, Hever R: Recovery of cognitive function soon after stroke: a study of visual neglect, attention span and verbal recall. J Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:10–13.
17.
Stone S, Patel P, Greenwood RJ, Halligan PW: Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:431–436.
18.
Diamond PT: Rehabilitative management of post-stroke visuospatial inattention. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:407–412.
19.
Kotila M, Niemi M, Laaksonen R: Four-year prognosis of stroke patients with visuospatial attention. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:177–179.
20.
Hjaltason H, Tegner R, Tham K, Levander M, Ericson K: Sustained attention and awareness of disability in chronic neglect. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:1229–1233.
21.
Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P: Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield, Thames Valley Test Company, 1987.
22.
Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G: Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage: a powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke 1993;24:987–993.
23.
Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN: Interrater reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale. Arch Neurol 1989;46:660–662.
24.
Mahoney F, Barthel D: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965;2:61–65.
25.
Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE: An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983;12:166–170.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.