The objective was to develop criteria that would prompt evaluation with video EEG monitoring in order to shorten the time to diagnosis of nonepileptic seizures. Over a period of 3 consecutive years, all patients being seen for seizures or the consideration of seizures meeting the following criteria were admitted for video EEG monitoring: (1) at least two events per week, (2) refractory to at least two medications, and (3) no prior EEG studies with epileptiform abnormalities after at least two attempts. A total of 13 patients met all three criteria, 11 of these patients had nonepileptic seizures, yielding a positive predictive value of 0.85. The median time from onset of symptoms until referral to the study institution was 3 years, with a range of 0–15 years. The median time from the first patient visit to a definitive diagnosis on video EEG monitoring was 1 month, with a range of 0–7 months. Patients meeting these three criteria frequently have nonepileptic seizures. These patients should undergo video EEG monitoring in a timely fashion to clarify the diagnosis.

1.
Gates JR, Mercer K: Nonepileptic events. Semin Neurol 1995;15:167–174.
2.
Gumnit RJ: Psychogenic seizures; in Wylie E (ed): The Treatment of Epilepsy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 699.
3.
Szaflarski JP, Victor DM, Cahill WT, Privitera MD: Four-year incidence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in adults in Hamilton County, OH. Neurology 2000;55:1561–1563.
4.
Sigurdardottir KR, Olafsson E: Incidence of psychogenic seizures in adults: A population based study in Iceland. Epilepsia 1998;39:749–752.
5.
Kokkat AJ, Verma AK: Prevalence of seizures and paralysis any rural community. J Indian Med Assoc 1998;96:43–45.
6.
Reuber M, Fernandez G, Bauer J, Helmstaedter C, Elger CE: Diagnostic delay in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2002;58:493–495.
7.
Benbadis SR: How many patients with pseudoseizures receive antiepileptic drugs prior to diagnosis? Eur Neurol 1999;41:114–115.
8.
Krumholz A: Nonepileptic seizures: Diagnosis and management. Neurology 1999;53(suppl 2):S76–S83.
9.
Pedley TA, Mendiratta A, Walczak TS: Seizures and epilepsy; in Ebersole JS, Pedley TA (eds): Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography. Philadelphia, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, 2003, pp 509–512.
10.
Ajmone Marsan C, Zivin LS: Factors related to the occurrence of typical paroxysmal abnormalities in EEG records of epileptic patients. Epilepsia 1970;11:361–381.
11.
Walczak TS, Scheuer ML, Resor S, Pedley TA: Prevalence and features of epilepsy without interictal epileptiform discharges. Neurology 1993;43(suppl 2):287–288.
12.
Kwan P, Brodie MJ: Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:314–319.
13.
King MA, Newton MR, Jackson GD, Fitt GJ, Mitchell LA, Silvapulle MJ, Berkovic SF: Epileptology of the first seizure presentation: A clinical, electroencephalographic, and magnetic resonance imaging study of 300 consecutive patients. Lancet 1998;352:1007–1011.
14.
Rodin E, Klutke G, Chayasirisobohn S: Epileptic patients who are refractory to anticonvulsant medications. Neurology 1982;32:1382–1384.
15.
Storzbach D, Binder LM, Salinsky MC, Campbell BR, Mueller RM: Improved prediction of nonepileptic seizures with combined MMPI and EEG measures. Epilepsia 2000;41:332–337.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.