Background and Purpose: While microsurgical clipping has been the choice of treatment for anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm, endovascular embolization is increasingly popular for treating intracranial aneurysms. Previous studies showed that in terms of mortality (i.e., death) and morbidity (i.e., functional outcome, independent living, rebleeding) rates, the clinical outcomes of coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms are as good as or even better than those of surgical clipping. However, little is known about the impact of these treatments on the cognitive functions of those survived after the treatment. Thus, the present study is designed to examine the cognitive deficits of patients treated with either surgical clipping or coil embolization. Method: Eighteen patients with a ruptured ACoA aneurysm were recruited. Half of them had undergone surgical clipping and the other half had endovascular embolization. Standardized neuropsychological tests were employed to assess their memory, executive function, motor ability, language and visual perceptual abilities. Results: The performance of the patients was in general poorer than that of the normal control subjects on tests of verbal memory, flexible thinking, ability to resist interference and motor control. However, in terms of severity, the patients who received surgical clipping demonstrated more severe impairment than those had endovascular embolization on these cognitive domains. In addition, while 33% of patients in the clipping group showed impairments on memory and executive function, no patient in the embolization group demonstrated these impairments. Conclusions: Patients with ACoA aneurysm demonstrated impaired verbal memory, executive function and motor abilities while their language and visual perception abilities remained relatively intact. However, when comparing the effect of treatment choice on the cognitive functions of these patients, the present results favored the coil embolization as the patients treated with coil embolization demonstrated significantly fewer severe cognitive deficits than patients who had undergone surgical clipping.

Keywords:
Anterior communicating artery aneurysm, Cerebral aneurysm, Coil embolization, Endovascular embolization, Intracranial aneurysm, Microsurgical clipping
1.
Hori S, Suzuki J: Early and late results of intracranial direct surgery of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1979;50:433–440.
2.
Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Sundbarg G, Saveland H, Cronqvist S, Stridbeck H: Early management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1982;11:412–418.
3.
Ropper AH, Zervas NT: Outcome 1 year after SAH from cerebral aneurysm: Management morbidity, mortality, and functional status in 112 consecutive good-risk patients. J Neurosurg 1984;60:909–915.
4.
McCormick WF: Pathology and pathogenesis of intracranial saccular aneurysms. Semin Neurol 1984;4:291–303.
5.
Serizawa T, Saeki N, Yamamura A: Microsurgical anatomy and clinical significance of the anterior communicating artery and its perforating branches. Neurosurgery 1997;40:1211–1217.
6.
Alexander MP, Freedman M: Amnesia after anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture. Neurology 1984;34:752–757.
7.
Damasio AR, Graff-Radford NR, Eslinger PJ, Damasio H, Kassell N: Amnesia following basal forebrain lesions. Arch Neurol 1985;42:263–271.
8.
DeLuca J: Cognitive dysfunction after aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992;14:924–934.
9.
Tidswell P, Dias PS, Sagar HJ: Cognitive outcome after aneurysm rupture: Relationship to aneurysm site and perioperative complications. Neurology 1995;45:875–882.
10.
Böttger S, Prosiegel M, Steiger HJ, Yassouridis A: Neurobehavioural disturbances, rehabilitation outcome, and lesion site in patients after rupture and repair of anterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:93–102.
11.
DeLuca J, Cicerone KD: Confabulation following aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery. Cortex 1991;27:417–421.
12.
Vilkki J: Amnesic syndromes after surgery of anterior communicating artery after aneurysms. Cortex 1985;21:431–444.
13.
Ture U, Yasargil G, Krisht AF: The arteries of the corpus callosum: A microsurgical anatomic study. Neurosurgery 1996;39:1075–1085.
14.
Volpe BT, Hirst WH: Amnesia following the rupture and repair of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:704–709.
15.
Schievink WI: Intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1997;336:28–40.
16.
Bryan RN, Rigamonti D, Mathis JM: The treatment of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms: Endovascular therapy versus surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1826–1830.
17.
Guglielmi G, Viuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V: Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. J Neurosurg 1991;75:1–7.
18.
Graves VB, Strother CM, Duff TA, Perl J II: Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: Effect on subsequent bleeding. Neurosurgery 1995;37:640–647.
19.
Lam MK, Chan SY, Poon WS: Endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms as a feasible option when microsurgical clipping fails. J Hong Kong Med Assoc 1994;46:207–215.
20.
Levy D: Embolization of wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysm: Technical note. Neurosurgery 1997;41:979–982.
21.
Moret J, Pierot L, Boulin A, Castaings L, Rey A: Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 1996;38:800–805.
22.
Cognard C, Pierot L, Boulin A, Weill A, Toevi M, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J: Intracranial aneurysms: Endovascular treatment with mechanical detachable spirals in 60 aneurysms. Radiology 1997;202:783–792.
23.
Brilstra EG, Rinkel GJE, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJJ, Algra A: Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: A systematic review. Stroke 1999;30:470–476.
24.
Johnston SC, Dudley RA, Gress DR, Ono L: Surgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at university hospitals. Neurology 1999;52:1799–1805.
25.
Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M: Guglielmi detachable coil embolisation of acute intracranial aneurysm: Perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;86:475–482.
26.
Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ: Five-year experience in using embolisation for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–663.
27.
Ljunggre B, Sonesson B, Saveland H, Brandt L: Cognitive impairment and adjustment in patients without neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH and early operation. J Neurosurg 1985;62:673–679.
28.
Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M: A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993;33:572–587.
29.
Hunt WE, Hess RM: Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–19.
30.
Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain injury. Lancet 1975;i:480–484.
31.
Chiu HFK, Lee HC, Chung WS, Kwong PK: Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination – A preliminary study. J Hong Kong Coll Psychiatry 1994;4:25–28.
32.
Chan AS, Kwok IC: Hong Kong List Learning Test. Department of Psychology and Clinical Psychology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 1999.
33.
Wechsler D: Wechsler Memory Scale – Revised. San Antonio/Tex, The Psychological Corp, 1987.
34.
Benedict RHB: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised. Odessa/Fla, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, 1997.
35.
Benton AL: Differential behavioural effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychology 1968;6:53–60.
36.
Lee G, Strauss E, McCloskey L, Loring D, Drane D: Localization of frontal lobe lesions using verbal and nonverbal fluency measures. Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Chicago 1996.
37.
Luria AR: Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York, Basic Books, 1966.
38.
Pontius AA, Yudowitz BS: Frontal lobe system dysfunction in some criminal actions in a Narratives Test. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980;168:111–117.
39.
Lezak MD: Neuropsychological Assessment, ed 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
40.
Matthews CG, Klove H: Instruction Manual for the Adult Neuropsychology Test Battery. Madison/Wisc, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1964.
41.
Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S: The Boston Naming Test. Experimental Edition (1978). Boston, Kaplan & Goodglass, ed 2 (1983). Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1978/83.
42.
Dricker J, Butters N, Berman G, et al: The recognition and encoding of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemisphere patients. Neuropsychology 1978;16:683–695.
43.
DeLuca J, Diamond BJ: Aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery: A review of neuroanatomical and neuropsychological sequelae. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995;17:100–121.
44.
Stuss DT, Alexander MPM, Palumbo CL, Buckle CL, Buckle L, Sayer L, Pogue SJ: Organizational strategies of patients with unilateral or bilateral or frontal lobe injury in word list learning. Neuropsychology 1994;8:355–373.
45.
Vincentelli F, Lehman G, Caruso G, et al: Extracerebral course of the perforating branches of the anterior communicating artery: Microsurgical anatomical study. Surg Neurol 1991;35:98–104.
46.
Gade A: Amnesia after operations on aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery. Surg Neurol 1982;18:46–69.
47.
Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA: Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 1995;118:279–306.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.