Background: From a public health perspective, alcohol taxation should be designed to reduce alcohol affordability and thus alcohol consumption and related harms. Objectives: In this brief report, we estimate alcohol affordability in European Union Member States and associated countries and investigate whether affordability is related to national alcohol excise duties. Method: Beverage-specific affordability for beer, wine, and spirits were estimated based on the number of standard drinks a household could purchase based on their median monthly disposable household income in 2020. To determine the pooled affordability of alcohol, the beverage-specific estimates were weighted by the share of the beverage-specific per capita consumption in total recorded consumption. Pearson and Spearman rank correlations were calculated to establish the association between alcohol affordability and alcohol excise duty rates. All data were retrieved from official sources. Results: On average, a European household can purchase 1,628 standard drinks of alcohol with its monthly income, with affordability being highest in Germany, Austria, France, and Luxembourg. The affordability of spirits, but not that of beer or wine, was inversely correlated with the beverage-specific excise duty rates. Conclusions: Alcohol is affordable in the Member States of the European Union and associated countries, and low levels of excise duties on beer and wine appear to be unrelated to their affordability. Alcohol taxes should be increased to effectively reduce the affordability of alcoholic beverages in order to lower the alcohol-related health burden in Europe.

1.
Manthey
J
,
Shield
KD
,
Rylett
M
,
Hasan
OSM
,
Probst
C
,
Rehm
J
.
Global alcohol exposure between 1990 and 2017 and forecasts until 2030: a modelling study
.
Lancet
.
2019
;
393
(
10190
):
2493
502
.
2.
European Commission
..
Europe’s beating cancer plan
.
European Commission
;
2021
. https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-02/eu_cancer-plan_en_0.pdf.
3.
Chisholm
D
,
Moro
D
,
Bertram
M
,
Pretorius
C
,
Gmel
G
,
Shield
K
,
.
Are the “best buys” for alcohol control still valid? An update on the comparative cost-effectiveness of alcohol control strategies at the global level
.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs
.
2018
;
79
(
4
):
514
22
.
4.
European Commission
..
Excise duty on alcohol
.
European Commission
;
2022
. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/excise-duties-alcohol-tobacco-energy/excise-duties-alcohol_en.
5.
Angus
C
,
Holmes
J
,
Meier
PS
.
Comparing alcohol taxation throughout the European Union
.
Addiction
.
2019
;
114
(
8
):
1489
94
.
6.
Neufeld
M
,
Rovira
P
,
Ferreira-Borges
C
,
Kilian
C
,
Sassi
F
,
Veryga
A
,
.
Impact of introducing a minimum alcohol tax share in retail prices on alcohol-attributable mortality in the WHO European Region: a modelling study
.
Lancet Reg Health Eur
.
2022
;
15
:
100325
.
7.
Eurostat. Distribution of income by quantiles – EU-SILC and ECHP surveys [ILC_DI01__custom_1274475]
[Data set]. Available from:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_DI01__custom_1274475/default/table
(accessed March 7, 2022); 2022
.
8.
Statista
.
Alcoholic drinks – price per unit. Europe [Data set]
.
Available from:
https://www.statista.com/outlook/10000000/102/alcoholic-drinks/europe
(accessed July 31, 2020);
2020
.
9.
World Health Organization
.
WHO Global Information System on Alcohol and Health (GISAH)
.
Geneva, Switzerland
:
World Health Organization
;
2022
.
10.
O’Donnell
A
,
Anderson
P
,
Jané-Llopis
E
,
Manthey
J
,
Kaner
E
,
Rehm
J
.
Immediate impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis for 2015–2018
.
BMJ
.
2019
;
366
:
l5274
.
You do not currently have access to this content.