Abstract
Objectives: Smoking is a highly prevalent addictive behavior with severe and life-shortening health consequences. This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed imaginal variant of approach bias modification (ABM) (i.e., imaginal retraining) for the reduction of craving for tobacco and actual smoking behavior. Methods: We randomized 345 smokers to imaginal retraining (self-help manual) or a control group (either active control or wait-list control). Assessments were carried out online. The treatment interval was 6 weeks. Craving for tobacco represented the primary outcome. The study was registered as DRKS00016860. Results: Retention was 79.7% with no difference between groups. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were significant for the primary outcome (Visual Analogue Scale on craving for tobacco) as well as subjective reduction of smoking (45.5 vs. 26.4%) in favor of imaginal retraining. In the treatment group, 47.6% performed the exercises at least once. This subgroup (per-protocol [PP] sample) showed a significant reduction in tobacco dependency as measured with the Cigarette Dependence Scale (short and long forms) and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence relative to controls. Number of daily cigarettes declined to a greater extent in imaginal retraining in the PP but not ITT analysis. A small dose-effect relationship emerged between craving and frequency of performance of the technique. Conclusion: When used regularly, imaginal retraining may reduce craving for tobacco and actual smoking behavior in a subgroup of smokers. In view of the large subgroup that did not read the manual or did not perform the exercises, alternative ways of conveying the imaginal retraining technique should be sought (e.g., demonstration via video clips). To conclude, imaginal retraining may represent a simple low-threshold technique to reduce smoking and assist current evidence-based treatment programs targeted at abstinence. It needs to be tested whether its mechanism of action deviates from standard ABM.
References
1.
Lang
JC
, Abrams
DM
, De Sterck
H
. The influence of societal individualism on a century of tobacco use: modelling the prevalence of smoking
. BMC Public Health
. 2015
;15
:1280
. 2.
World Health Organization
. European tobacco use. Trends report 2019
. Copenhagen, Denmark
: WHO Regional Office for Europe
; 2019
.3.
Aune
D
, Schlesinger
S
, Norat
T
, Riboli
E
. Tobacco smoking and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
. Eur J Prev Cardiol
. 2019
;26
(3
):279
–88
. 4.
Santoro
A
, Tomino
C
, Prinzi
G
, Lamonaca
P
, Cardaci
V
, Fini
M
, et al. Tobacco smoking: risk to develop addiction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer
. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov
. 2019
;14
(1
):39
–52
. 5.
Britton
J
. Death, disease, and tobacco
. Lancet
. 2017
;389
(10082
):1861
–2
. 6.
Reitsma
MB
, Fullman
N
, Ng
M
, Salama
JS
, Abajobir
A
, Abate
KH
, et al. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015
. Lancet
. 2017
;389
(10082
):1885
–906
. 7.
Kotz
D
, Böckmann
M
, Kastaun
S
. The use of tobacco, e-cigarettes, and methods to quit smoking in Germany
. Dtsch Arztebl Int
. 2018
;115
(14
):235
–42
.8.
Hughes
JR
, Keely
J
, Naud
S
. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers
. Addiction
. 2004
;99
(1
):29
–38
. 9.
Boyle
RG
, Stanton
CA
, Sharma
E
, Tang
Z
. Examining quit attempts and successful quitting after recent cigarette tax increases
. Prev Med
. 2019
;118
:226
–31
.10.
Zhou
X
, Nonnemaker
J
, Sherrill
B
, Gilsenan
AW
, Coste
F
, West
R
. Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study
. Addict Behav
. 2009
;34
(4
):365
–73
. 11.
Bechara
A
. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective
. Nat Neurosci
. 2005
;8
(11
):1458
–63
. 12.
Strack
F
, Deutsch
R
, Deutsch
R
. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior
. Pers Soc Psychol Rev
. 2006
;8
(3
):220
–16
. 13.
Evans
JS
, Stanovich
KE
. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate
. Perspect Psychol Sci
. 2013
;8
(3
):223
–41
.14.
Kakoschke
N
, Albertella
L
, Lee
RSC
, Wiers
RW
. Assessment of automatically activated approach: avoidance biases across appetitive substances
. Curr Addict Rep
. 2019
;6
(3
):200
–9
.15.
Wiers
RW
, Rinck
M
, Kordts
R
, Houben
K
, Strack
F
. Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers
. Addiction
. 2010
;105
(2
):279
–87
. 16.
Kakoschke
N
, Kemps
E
, Tiggemann
M
. Approach bias modification training and consumption: a review of the literature
. Addict Behav
. 2017
;64
:21
–8
. 17.
Eberl
C
, Wiers
RW
, Pawelczack
S
, Rinck
M
, Becker
ES
, Lindenmeyer
J
. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?
Dev Cogn Neurosci
. 2013
;4
:38
–51
. 18.
Wiers
RW
, Eberl
C
, Rinck
M
, Becker
ES
, Lindenmeyer
J
. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome
. Psychol Sci
. 2011
;22
(4
):490
–7
. 19.
Fodor
LA
, Cosmoiu
A
, Cosmoiu
A
, Podina
IR
. Cognitive bias modification interventions for attention to and approach of appetitive food stimuli: a meta-analysis
. J Evid-based Psychot
. 2017
;17
(2
):85
–104
. 20.
Cristea
IA
, Kok
RN
, Cuijpers
P
. The effectiveness of cognitive bias modification interventions for substance addictions: a meta-analysis
. PLoS One
. 2016
;11
(9
):e0162226
. 21.
Boffo
M
, Zerhouni
O
, Gronau
QF
, van Beek
RJJ
, Nikolaou
K
, Marsman
M
, et al. Cognitive bias modification for behavior change in alcohol and smoking addiction: Bayesian meta-analysis of individual participant data
. Neuropsychol Rev
. 2019
;29
(1
):52
–78
. 22.
Mühlig
S
, Paulick
J
, Lindenmeyer
J
, Rinck
M
, Cina
R
, Wiers
RW
. Applying the ‘cognitive bias modification’ concept to smoking cessation: a systematic review
. Sucht
. 2016
;62
(6
):333
–54
. 23.
Wittekind
CE
, Lüdecke
D
, Cludius
B
. Web-based approach bias modification in smokers: a randomized-controlled study
. Behav Res Ther
. 2019
;116
:52
–60
. 24.
Wittekind
CE
, Reibert
E
, Takano
K
, Ehring
T
, Pogarell
O
, Rüther
T
. Approach-avoidance modification as an add-on in smoking cessation: a randomized-controlled study
. Behav Res Ther
. 2019
;114
:35
–43
. 25.
Machulska
A
, Zlomuzica
A
, Rinck
M
, Assion
HJ
, Margraf
J
. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers
. J Psychiatr Res
. 2016
;76
:44
–51
. 26.
Moritz
S
, Paulus
AM
, Hottenrott
B
, Weierstall
R
, Gallinat
J
, Kühn
S
. Imaginal retraining reduces alcohol craving in problem drinkers: a randomized controlled trial
. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
. 2019
;64
:158
–66
. 27.
Boendermaker
WJ
, Boffo
M
, Wiers
RW
. Exploring elements of fun to motivate youth to do cognitive bias modification
. Games Health J
. 2015
;4
(6
):434
–43
. 28.
Fridland
E
, Wiers
CE
. Addiction and embodiment
. Phenom Cogn Sci
. 2018
;17
(1
):15
–42
. 29.
Göritz
AS
. Building and managing an online panel with phpPanelAdmin
. Behav Res Methods
. 2009
;41
(4
):1177
–82
. 30.
Göritz
AS
. Using online panels in psychological research
. In: Joinson
AN
, McKenna
KYA
, Postmes
T
, Reips
U-D
, editors. Oxford handbook of internet psychology
. Oxford, UK
: Oxford University Press
; 2007
. p. 473
–85
.31.
Lüdtke
T
, Pult
LK
, Schröder
J
, Moritz
S
, Bücker
L
. A randomized controlled trial on a smartphone self-help application (Be Good to Yourself) to reduce depressive symptoms
. Psychiatry Res
. 2018
;269
:753
–62
. 32.
Moritz
S
, Ahlf-Schumacher
J
, Hottenrott
B
, Peter
U
, Franck
S
, Schnell
T
, et al. We cannot change the past, but we can change its meaning. A randomized controlled trial on the effects of self-help imagery rescripting on depression
. Behav Res Ther
. 2018
;104
:74
–83
. 33.
Etter
JF
, Le Houezec
J
, Perneger
TV
. A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: the cigarette dependence scale
. Neuropsychopharmacology
. 2003
;28
(2
):359
–70
. 34.
Etter
J-F
. Comparing the validity of the Cigarette Dependence Scale and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence
. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2008
;95
(1–2
):152
–9
. 35.
Etter
JF
, Le Houezec
J
, Huguelet
P
, Etter
M
. Testing the Cigarette Dependence Scale in 4 samples of daily smokers: psychiatric clinics, smoking cessation clinics, a smoking cessation website and in the general population
. Addict Behav
. 2009
;34
(5
):446
–50
. 36.
Heatherton
TF
, Kozlowski
LT
, Frecker
RC
, Fagerström
KO
. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire
. Br J Addict
. 1991
;86
(9
):1119
–27
. 37.
Pomerleau
CS
, Carton
SM
, Lutzke
ML
, Flessland
KA
, Pomerleau
OF
. Reliability of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence
. Addict Behav
. 1994
;19
(1
):33
–9
. 38.
Skevington
SM
, Lotfy
M
, O’Connell
KA
. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group
. Qual Life Res
. 2004
;13
(2
):299
–310
. 39.
Beck
AT
, Steer
RA
, Brown
GK
. Beck depression inventory
. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX
: The Psychological Corporation
; 1996
.40.
Kühner
C
, Bürger
C
, Keller
F
, Hautzinger
M
. Reliabilität und Validität des revidierten Beck-Depressionsinventars (BDI-II)
. Nervenarzt
. 2007
;78
(6
):651
–6
. 41.
Greenstein
DK
, Franklin
ME
, McGuffin
P
. Measuring motivation to change: an examination of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA) in an adolescent sample
. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train
. 1999
;36
(1
):47
–55
. 42.
Chan
SCC
, Chan
CCH
, Siu
AMH
, Poon
PKK
. Stage of change in self-management of chronic diseases: psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (C-URICA) Scale
. Rehabil Psychol
. 2007
;52
(1
):103
–12
. 43.
Dozois
DJ
, Westra
HA
, Collins
KA
, Fung
TS
, Garry
JK
. Stages of change in anxiety: psychometric properties of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) scale
. Behav Res Ther
. 2004
;42
(6
):711
–29
. 44.
Schmidt
J
, Lamprecht
F
, Wittmann
WW
. Zufriedenheit mit der stationären Versorgung. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens und erste Validitätsuntersuchungen [Content with inpatient care. Development of a questionnaire and a first study on validity]
. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol
. 1989
;39
:248
–55
.45.
Weil
R
, Feist
A
, Moritz
S
, Wittekind
CE
. Approaching contamination-related stimuli with an implicit Approach-Avoidance Task: can it reduce OCD symptoms? An online pilot study
. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
. 2017
;57
:180
–8
. 46.
Wiers
RW
, Houben
K
, Fadardi
JS
, van Beek
P
, Rhemtulla
M
, Cox
WM
. Alcohol cognitive bias modification training for problem drinkers over the web
. Addict Behav
. 2015
;40
:21
–6
. © 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
