Introduction: Following the digital progress and the availability of online streaming services, binge-watching (in the literature often defined as watching >2 episodes of a TV series in one sitting) has become a popular viewing pattern. Concerns about possible negative consequences of this behaviour have arisen and its proximity to behavioural addictions is discussed. The aim of the present study was to explore how depressive symptoms, impulsivity and their potential interaction are related to the consequences of binge-watching. In addition, the possible association of the Big 5 personality traits neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness with consequences from binge-watching was assessed. Method: An online survey including the assessment of intensity of and negative consequences from binge-watching (with an adapted version of the Short-Internet-Addiction Test and a newly developed questionnaire) and questionnaires on depressive symptoms (i.e., General Depression Scale), impulsivity (i.e., Barratt Impulsiveness Scale) and personality traits (i.e., short version of the Big 5 Inventory) was completed by 228 participants. Results: Regression analysis indicated that impulsivity was associated with loss of control and neglect of duties, while depressive symptoms led to neglect of duties and social problems. No significant interaction effects were observed. Conscientiousness was the only personality trait that explained a significant proportion of the variance of consequences from binge-watching. Discussion/Conclusion: Our findings suggest that depressive symptoms and impulsivity are 2 independent pathways to negative consequences from binge watching. However, given the rather low proportion of variance proportion explained, future studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of other individual characteristics and to further clarify the proximity to behavioural addictions.

Journal Section:
Editor's choice
Keywords:
Binge-watching, Impulsivity, Loss of control, Marathon viewing, TV series
1.
Jenner M. Binge-watching: Video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom. Int J Cult Stud. 2017;20(3):304–20.
2.
Mittell J. Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling: NYU Press; 2015.
3.
Alter AL. Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York: Penguin Press; 2017.
4.
Walton-Pattison E, Dombrowski SU, Presseau J. ‘Just one more episode’: frequency and theoretical correlates of television binge watching. J Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;23(1):17–24.
5.
Abdel-Azim A, Ahmed M. New era of TV-watching behavior: binge watching and its psychological effects. Media Watch. 2017;8:192–207.
6.
Flayelle M, Maurage P, Vögele C, Karila L, Billieux J. Time for a plot twist: beyond confirmatory approaches to binge-watching research. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2019;8(3):308–18.
7.
Pittman M, Steiner E. Transportation or Narrative Completion? Attentiveness during Binge-Watching Moderates Regret. Soc Sci. 2019;8(3):99.
8.
Flayelle M, Maurage P, Billieux J. Toward a qualitative understanding of binge-watching behaviors: A focus group approach. J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec;6(4):457–71.
9.
Exelmans L, Van den Bulck J. binge viewing, sleep, and the role of pre-sleep arousal. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Aug;13(8):1001–8.
10.
Camart N, Zebdi R, Bouvet C. Between pleasure and risk - the psychology of TV series watching: An empirical study with 400 participants. In: Camart N, Lefait S, Paquet-Deyris AM, Romo L, editors. Combining aesthetic and psychological approaches to TV series addiction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2018. pp. 36–54.
11.
Orosz G, Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I. The development of the Problematic Series WatchingScale (PSWS). J Behav Addict. 2016 Mar;5(1):144–50.
12.
Billieux J, Schimmenti A, Khazaal Y, Maurage P, Heeren A. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J Behav Addict. 2015 Sep;4(3):119–23.
13.
A bad habit for your health?: An exploration of psychological factors for binge-watching behavior; 2015.
14.
Deleuze J, Long J, Liu TQ, Maurage P, Billieux J. Passion or addiction? Correlates of healthy versus problematic use of videogames in a sample of French-speaking regular players. Addict Behav. 2018 Jul;82:114–21.
15.
Tóth-Király I, Bőthe B, Tóth-Fáber E, Hága G, Orosz G. Connected to TV series: quantifying series watching engagement. J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec;6(4):472–89.
16.
Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, Müller A, Wölfling K, Robbins TW, et al. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:1–10.
17.
Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:252–66.
18.
Tukachinsky R, Eyal K. The psychology of marathon television viewing: antecedents and viewer involvement. Mass Commun Soc. 2018;21(3):1–21.
19.
Billieux J, Gay P, Rochat L, Van der Linden M. The role of urgency and its underlying psychological mechanisms in problematic behaviours. Behav Res Ther. 2010 Nov;48(11):1085–96.
20.
Cao F, Su L, Liu T, Gao X. The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;22(7):466–71.
21.
Choi JS, Park SM, Roh MS, Lee JY, Park CB, Hwang JY, et al. Dysfunctional inhibitory control and impulsivity in Internet ­addiction. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb;215(2):424–8.
22.
Barratt ES. Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing. In: Spence JT, Izard CE, editors. Motivation, emotion, and personality. North-Holland. the Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1985. pp. 137–46.
23.
Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;51(6):768–74.
24.
Riddle K, Peebles A, Davis C, Xu F, Schroeder E. The addictive potential of television binge watching: comparing intentional and unintentional binges. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2018;7(4):589–604.
25.
Orosz G, Vallerand R, Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Paskuj B. On the correlates of passion for screen-based behaviors: the case of impulsivity and the problematic and non-problematic Facebook use and tv series watching. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;101:167–76.
26.
Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers Individ Dif. 2001;30(4):669–89.
27.
Young KS, Rogers RC. The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1(1):25–8.
28.
Pawlikowski M, Altstötter-Gleich C, Brand M. Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(3):1212–23.
29.
Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Aug;7(4):443–50.
30.
Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Schächtle U, Schöler T, Altstötter-Gleich C. Watching pornographic pictures on the Internet: role of sexual arousal ratings and psychological-psychiatric symptoms for using Internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Jun;14(6):371–7.
31.
Pawlikowski M, Brand M. Excessive Internet gaming and decision making: do excessive World of Warcraft players have problems in decision making under risky conditions? Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug;188(3):428–33.
32.
Trotzke P, Starcke K, Müller A, Brand M. Pathological buying online as a specific form of Internet addiction: A model-based experimental investigation. PLoS One. 2015 Oct;10(10):e0140296.
33.
Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271–324.
34.
Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität. Diagnostica. 2009;55(1):2–10.
35.
Mischel W, Ebbesen EB, Zeiss AR. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Feb;21(2):204–18.
36.
Bentler PM, Yuan KH. Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: test Statistics. Multivariate Behav Res. 1999 Apr;34(2):181–97.
37.
Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Hofmeister D, Keller F. ADS: Allgemeine Depressionsskala. Hogrefe; 2012.
38.
Meule A, Vögele C, Kübler A. Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Barratt Impulsiveness Scale – Kurzversion. Diagnostica. 2011;57(3):126–33.
39.
Rammstedt B, John OP. Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K). Diagnostica. 2005;51(4):195–206.
40.
Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):5–13.
41.
Feingold A. Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):429–56.
42.
Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2003.
43.
Müller A, Trotzke P, Mitchell JE, de Zwaan M, Brand M. The pathological buying screener: development and psychometric properties of a new screening instrument for the assessment of pathological buying symptoms. PLoS One. 2015 Oct;10(10):e0141094.
44.
Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Gjertsen SR, Krossbakken E, Kvam S, Pallesen S. The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. J Behav Addict. 2013 Jun;2(2):90–9.
45.
Zhou Y, Li D, Li X, Wang Y, Zhao L. Big five personality and adolescent Internet addiction: the mediating role of coping style. Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:42–8.
46.
Flayelle M, Canale N, Vögele C, Karila L, Maurage P, Billieux J. Assessing binge-watching behaviors: Development and validation of the “Watching TV Series Motives” and “Binge-watching Engagement and Symptoms” questionnaires. Comput Human Behav. 2019;90:26–36.
47.
Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A. Internet paradox revisited. J Soc Issues. 2002;58(1):49–74.
48.
Orsal O, Orsal O, Unsal A, Ozalp SS. Evaluation of Internet addiction and depression among university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;82:445–54.
49.
Czapla M, Simon JJ, Richter B, Kluge M, Friederich HC, Herpertz S, et al. The impact of cognitive impairment and impulsivity on relapse of alcohol-dependent patients: implications for psychotherapeutic treatment. Addict Biol. 2016 Jul;21(4):873–84.
50.
Shim H, Kim KJ. An exploration of the motivations for binge-watching and the role of individual differences. Comput Human Behav. 2018;82:94–100.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2020
You do not currently have access to this content.