Background and Objectives: Even though nightlife studies with potentially intoxicated participants provide the much needed information on drug use, they face additional methodological challenges. This study aimed to explore the utility of such studies by (i) classifying nightlife attendees based on their self-reported drug use and by (ii) examining whether these classifications were meaningful when assessed against other sources of data, including oral fluid drug tests. Methods: Self-reported questionnaires, oral fluid samples and blood alcohol concentration readings were collected in a sample of 1,085 nightlife patrons recruited outside 12 popular nightclubs in Oslo, Norway, in 2014. Patrons were classified using multiple approaches, including latent class analysis. Group differences were examined by logistic regression models. Results: Participants were classified into 5 mutually exclusive groups: 2 among current non-users (“Never-users”; “Previous users”), 2 among current users (“Multiple drugs”; “Cannabis mainly”) and one “Incomplete information” group. Meaningful differences across these groups were observed. For instance, positive tests for any illicit drug were more common in “Multiple drugs” group than in “Cannabis mainly” (62.7 vs. 29.1%, adjusted OR [aOR] 3.77 [2.42–5.84]) or “Incomplete information” groups (62.7 vs. 34.4%, aOR 2.46 [1.26–4.79]). Despite their self-declared non-use, illicit substances were detected in oral fluids of “Never-users” (13.1%; 95% CI 9.9–17.2) and “Previous users” (7.9%; 95% CI 5.1–12.1). Conclusions: Despite some discrepancies between self-reports and biological tests, self-reports proved both suitable and useful in identification of substantively different drug-user typologies, potentially informing targeted policy responses. Still, methodological challenges associated with onsite studies of illicit drug use should be further explored.

Keywords:
Drug-user groups, Person-centered analysis, Latent Class Analysis, Biological drug-tests, Blood alcohol concentration levels
1.
Harrison L, Hughes A. Introduction–the validity of self-reported drug use: improving the accuracy of survey estimates.
NIDA Res Monogr
. 1997; 167: 1–16.
2.
Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.
Annu Rev Psychol
. 2009; 60(1): 549–76.
3.
Molenberghs G, Fitzmaurice G, Kenward MG, Tsiatis A, Verbeke G, editors.
Handbook of Missing Data Methodology Taylor & Francis
; 2014.
4.
Riley SC, James C, Gregory D, Dingle H, Cadger M. Patterns of recreational drug use at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Addiction
. 2001 Jul; 96(7): 1035–47.
5.
Miller P, Curtis A, Jenkinson R, Droste N, Bowe SJ, Pennay A. Drug use in Australian nightlife settings: estimation of prevalence and validity of self-report.
Addiction
. 2015 Nov; 110(11): 1803–10.
6.
Calafat A, Blay NT, Hughes K, Bellis M, Juan M, Duch M, et al. Nightlife young risk behaviours in Mediterranean versus other European cities: are stereotypes true?
Eur J Public Health
. 2011 Jun; 21(3): 311–5.
7.
Grov C, Kelly BC, Parsons JT. Polydrug use among club-going young adults recruited through time-space sampling.
Subst Use Misuse
. 2009; 44(6): 848–64.
8.
Vallance K, Roth E, Thompson K, Chow C, Martin G. Partying last weekend: factors related to heavy episodic drinking among people who use recreational drugs.
Subst Use Misuse
. 2016 Nov; 51(13): 1731–40.
9.
Kelly BC, Wells BE, Leclair A, Tracy D, Parsons JT, Golub SA. Prevalence and correlates of prescription drug misuse among socially active young adults.
Int J Drug Policy
. 2013 Jul; 24(4): 297–303.
10.
Duff C. Party drugs and party people: examining the ‘normalization’ of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy
. 2005; 16(3): 161–70.
11.
Miller BA, Holder HD, Voas RB. Environmental strategies for prevention of drug use and risks in clubs.
J Subst Use
. 2009; 14(1): 19–38.
12.
Miller BA, Byrnes HF, Branner AC, Voas R, Johnson MB. Assessment of club patrons’ alcohol and drug use: the use of biological markers.
Am J Prev Med
. 2013 Nov; 45(5): 637–43.
13.
Pennay A, Jenkinson R, Quinn B, Droste NT, Peacock A, Lubman DI, et al. Investigating differences between drugs used in the Australian night-time economy: Demographics, substance use, and harm.
Subst Use Misuse
. 2017 Jan; 52(1): 71–81.
14.
Bourdeau B, Miller BA, Voas RB, Johnson MB, Byrnes HF. Social drinking groups and risk experience in nightclubs: latent class analysis.
Health Risk Soc
. 2017; 19(5-6): 316–35.
15.
Fernández-Calderón F, Cleland CM, Palamar JJ. Polysubstance use profiles among electronic dance music party attendees in New York City and their relation to use of new psychoactive substances.
Addict Behav
. 2018 Mar; 78: 85–93.
16.
Hannemann TV, Kraus L, Piontek D. Consumption patterns of nightlife attendees in Munich: A Latent-Class Analysis.
Subst Use Misuse
. 2017 Sep; 52(11): 1511–21.
17.
Peacock A, Norman T, Bruno R, Pennay A, Droste N, Jenkinson R, et al. Typology of alcohol consumers in five Australian nighttime entertainment districts.
Drug Alcohol Rev
. 2016 Sep; 35(5): 539–48.
18.
Ramo DE, Grov C, Delucchi K, Kelly BC, Parsons JT. Typology of club drug use among young adults recruited using time-space sampling.
Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2010 Mar; 107(2-3): 119–27.
19.
Sañudo A, Andreoni S, Sanchez ZM. Polydrug use among nightclub patrons in a megacity: A latent class analysis.
Int J Drug Policy
. 2015 Dec; 26(12): 1207–14.
20.
Nordfjærn T, Edland-Gryt M, Bretteville-Jensen AL, Buvik K, Gripenberg J. Recreational drug use in the Oslo nightlife setting: study protocol for a cross-sectional time series using biological markers, self-reported and qualitative data.
BMJ Open
. 2016 Apr; 6(4):e009306.
21.
Gjerde H, Nordfjærn T, Bretteville-Jensen AL, Edland-Gryt M, Furuhaugen H, Karinen R, et al. Comparison of drugs used by nightclub patrons and criminal offenders in Oslo, Norway.
Forensic Sci Int
. 2016 Aug; 265: 1–5.
22.
Bosker WM, Huestis MA. Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse.
Clin Chem
. 2009 Nov; 55(11): 1910–31.
23.
Dyer KR, Wilkinson C. The detection of illicit drugs in oral fluid: another potential strategy to reduce illicit drug-related harm.
Drug Alcohol Rev
. 2008 Jan; 27(1): 99–107.
24.
Øiestad EL, Johansen U, Christophersen AS. Drug screening of preserved oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Clin Chem
. 2007 Feb; 53(2): 300–9.
25.
Muthén B, Muthén LK. Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
. 2000 Jun; 24(6): 882–91.
26.
Bergman LR, Magnusson D. A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology.
Dev Psychopathol
. 1997; 9(2): 291–319.
27.
Collins LM, Lanza ST.
Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences
. John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
28.
Johnson MB, Voas RA, Miller BA, Holder HD. Predicting drug use at electronic music dance events: self-reports and biological measurement.
Eval Rev
. 2009 Jun; 33(3): 211–25.
29.
Magura S, Kang SY. Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytical review.
Subst Use Misuse
. 1996 Jul; 31(9): 1131–53.
30.
Palamar JJ, Salomone A, Gerace E, Di Corcia D, Vincenti M, Cleland CM. Hair testing to assess both known and unknown use of drugs amongst ecstasy users in the electronic dance music scene.
Int J Drug Policy
. 2017 Oct; 48: 91–8.
31.
Gripenberg-Abdon J, Elgán TH, Wallin E, Shaafati M, Beck O, Andréasson S. Measuring substance use in the club setting: a feasibility study using biochemical markers.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
. 2012 Feb; 7(1): 7.
32.
Cone EJ. Oral fluid results compared to self reports of recent cocaine and heroin use by methadone maintenance patients.
Forensic Sci Int
. 2012 Feb; 215(1-3): 88–91.
33.
Denis C, Fatséas M, Beltran V, Bonnet C, Picard S, Combourieu I, et al. Validity of the self-reported drug use section of the Addiction Severity Index and associated factors used under naturalistic conditions.
Subst Use Misuse
. 2012 Mar; 47(4): 356–63.
34.
Neale J, Robertson M. Comparisons of self-report data and oral fluid testing in detecting drug use amongst new treatment clients.
Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2003 Jul; 71(1): 57–64.
35.
Yonkers KA, Howell HB, Gotman N, Rounsaville BJ. Self-report of illicit substance use versus urine toxicology results from at-risk pregnant women.
J Subst Use
. 2011 Oct; 16(5): 372–89.
36.
Casbon TS, Curtin JJ, Lang AR, Patrick CJ. Deleterious effects of alcohol intoxication: diminished cognitive control and its behavioral consequences.
J Abnorm Psychol
. 2003 Aug; 112(3): 476–87.
37.
Peterson JB, Rothfleisch J, Zelazo PD, Pihl RO. Acute alcohol intoxication and cognitive functioning.
J Stud Alcohol
. 1990 Mar; 51(2): 114–22.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.