Abstract
Aims: This paper examines the addictive potential of 8 different Internet applications, distinguishing male and female users. Moreover, differential correlates of problematic use are investigated in Internet gamers (IG) and generalized Internet users (GIU). Method: In a representative sample of 5,667 adolescents aged 12-19 years, use of Internet applications, problematic Internet use, psychopathologic symptoms (emotional problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and psychosomatic complaints), personality (conscientiousness and extraversion), psychosocial correlates (perceived stress and self-efficacy), and coping strategies were assessed. The addictive potential of Internet applications was examined in boys and girls using regression analysis. MANOVAs were conducted to examine differential correlates of problematic Internet use between IG and GIU. Results: Chatting and social networking most strongly predicted problematic Internet use in girls, while gaming was the strongest predictor in boys. Problematic IG exhibited multiple psychosocial problems compared to non-problematic IG. In problematic Internet users, GIU reported even higher psychosocial burden and displayed dysfunctional coping strategies more frequently than gamers. Conclusion: The results extend previous findings on the addictive potential of Internet applications and validate the proposed distinction between specific and generalized problematic Internet use. In addition to Internet gaming disorder, future studies should also focus on other highly addictive Internet applications, that is, chatting or social networking, regarding differential correlates of problematic use.
Journal Section:
Editor's choice
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
2.
Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, Pallesen S: The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav 2016;30:252-262.
[PubMed]
3.
Bischof G, Bischof A, Meyer C, John U, Rumpf H: Prävalenz der Internetabhängigkeit - Diagnostik und Risikoprofile (PINTA-DIARI), 2013;1-9.
4.
Gentile DA, Choo H, Liau A, Sim T, Li D, Fung D, Khoo A: Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics 2011;127:e319-e329.
[PubMed]
5.
Müller KW, Janikian M, Dreier M, Wölfling K, Beutel ME, Tzavara C, Richardson C, Tsitsika A: Regular gaming behavior and internet gaming disorder in European adolescents: results from a cross-national representative survey of prevalence, predictors, and psychopathological correlates. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;24:565-574.
[PubMed]
6.
Rehbein F, Kliem S, Baier D, Mößle T, Petry NM: Prevalence of internet gaming disorder in German adolescents: diagnostic contribution of the nine DSM-5 criteria in a state-wide representative sample. Addiction 2015;110: 842-851.
[PubMed]
7.
Laconi S, Tricard N, Chabrol H: Differences between specific and generalized problematic Internet uses according to gender, age, time spent online and psychopathological symptoms. Comput Human Behav 2015;48:236-244.
8.
Starcevic V, Billieux J: Does the construct of Internet addiction reflect a single entity or a spectrum of disorders? Clin Neuropsychiatry 2017;14:5-10.
9.
Griffiths MD, Pontes HM: Internet addiction disorder and Internet gaming disorder are not the same. Addict Res Ther 2014;5:e124.
10.
Brand M, Laier C, Young KS: Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications. Front Psychol 2014;5:1256.
[PubMed]
11.
Davis RA: A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Human Behav 2001;17:187-195.
12.
Montag C, Bey K, Sha P, Li M, Chen YF, Liu WY, Zhu YK, Li CB, Markett S, Keiper J, Reuter M: Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 2015;7:20-26.
[PubMed]
13.
Rehbein F, Mößle T: Video game and internet addiction: is there a need for differentiation? Sucht 2013;59:129-142.
14.
Kormas G, Critselis E, Janikian M, Kafetzis D, Tsitsika A: Risk factors and psychosocial characteristics of potential problematic and problematic internet use among adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2011;11:595.
[PubMed]
15.
Meerkerk GJ, van den Eijnden RJJM, Franken IHA, Garretsen HFL: Is compulsive internet use related to sensitivity to reward and punishment, and impulsivity? Comput Human Behav 2010;26:729-735.
16.
van Rooij AJ, Schoenmakers TM, van de Eijnden RJ, van de Mheen D: Compulsive Internet use: the role of online gaming and other Internet applications. J Adolesc Heal 2010;47:51-57.
[PubMed]
17.
Meerkerk GJ, van den Eijnden RJ, Garretsen HF: Predicting compulsive Internet use: it's all about sex! Cyberpsychology Behav 2006;9:95-103.
[PubMed]
18.
Morrison CM, Gore H: The relationship between excessive internet use and depression: a questionnaire-based study of 1,319 young people and adults. Psychopathology 2010;43:121-126.
[PubMed]
19.
Tsitsika A, Janikian M, Schoenmakers TM, Tzavela EC, Olafsson K, Wójcik S, Macarie GF, Tzavara C, Richardson C: Internet addictive behavior in adolescence: a cross-sectional study in seven European countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014;17:528-535.
[PubMed]
20.
Mérelle SYM, Kleiboer AM, Schotanus M, Cluitmans T, Waardenburg CM, Kramer D, Van de Mheen D, van Rooij AJ: Which health-related problems are associated with problematic video-gaming or social media use in adolescents? A large-scale cross-sectional study. Clin Neuropsyschiatry 2017;14:11-19.
21.
Strittmatter E, Parzer P, Brunner R, Fischer G, Durkee T, Carli V, Hoven CW, Wasserman C, Sarchiapone M, Wasserman D, Resch F, Kaess M: A 2-year longitudinal study of prospective predictors of pathological Internet use in adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016;25:725-734.
[PubMed]
22.
Durkee T, Kaess M, Carli V, Parzer P, Wasserman C, Floderus B, Apter A, Balazs J, Barzilay S, Bobes J, Brunner R, Corcoran P, Cosman D, Cotter P, Despalins R, Graber N, Guillemin F, Haring C, Kahn JP, Mandelli L, Marusic D, Mészáros G, Musa GJ, Postuvan V, Resch F, Saiz PA, Sisask M, Varnik A, Sarchiapone M, Hoven CW, Wasserman D: Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and social factors. Addiction 2012;107:2210-2222.
[PubMed]
23.
Király O, Griffiths MD, Urbán R, Farkas J, Kökönyei G, Elekes Z, Tamás D, Demetrovics Z: Problematic internet use and problematic online gaming are not the same: findings from a large nationally representative adolescent sample. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014;17:749-754.
[PubMed]
24.
Müller KW, Beutel ME, Egloff B, Wölfling K: Investigating risk factors for internet gaming disorder: a comparison of patients with addictive gaming, pathological gamblers and healthy controls regarding the big five personality traits. Eur Addict Res 2013;20:129-136.
[PubMed]
25.
Walther B, Morgenstern M, Hanewinkel R: Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. Eur Addict Res 2012;18:167-174.
[PubMed]
26.
Pawlikowski M, Nader IW, Burger C, Stieger S, Brand M: Pathological Internet use - it is a multidimensional and not a unidimensional construct. Addict Res Theory 2014;22:166-175.
27.
King DL, Delfabbro PH, Zwaans T, Kaptsis D: Clinical features and axis I comorbidity of Australian adolescent pathological Internet and video game users. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013;47:1058-1067.
[PubMed]
28.
Kuss DJ, Dunn TJ, Wölfling K, Müller K, Hędzelek M, Abstract JM: Excessie Internet use and psychopathology: the role of coping. Clin Neuropsychiatry 2017;14:73-81.
29.
Parker JDA, Taylor RN, Eastabrook JM, Schell SL, Wood LM: Problem gambling in adolescence: relationships with internet misuse, gaming abuse and emotional intelligence. Pers Individ Dif 2008;45:174-180.
30.
Müller KW, Glaesmer H, Brähler E, Woelfling K, Beutel ME: Prevalence of internet addiction in the general population: results from a German population-based survey. Behav Inf Technol 2014;33:757-766.
31.
Müller KW, Beutel ME, Wölfling K: A contribution to the clinical characterization of Internet addiction in a sample of treatment seekers: validity of assessment, severity of psychopathology and type of co-morbidity. Compr Psychiatry 2014;55:770-777.
[PubMed]
32.
Costa PT, McCrae RR: Neo PI/FFI Manual Supplement. Odessa, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
33.
Borkenau P, Ostendorf F: NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae (Handanweisung). Göttingen: Hogrefe, Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae, 1993.
34.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385-396.
[PubMed]
35.
Cohen S, Williamson G: Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States; in Spacapan S, Oskamp S: (eds), Newbury Park, Sage. Soc Psychol Heal Claremont Symp Appl Soc Psychol 1988, pp 31-67.
36.
Klein EM, Brähler E, Dreier M, Müller KW, Schmutzer G, Wölfling K, Beutel ME: The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale - Psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:159.
[PubMed]
37.
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M: Generalized Self-Efficacy scale; in Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M: (eds) Meas Heal Psychol A user's portfolio Casual Control beliefs, Windsor, NFER-NELSON, 1995, pp 35-37.
38.
Hinz A, Schumacher J, Albani C, Schmid G, Brähler E: Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostica 2006;52:26-32.
39.
Goodman R: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J child Psychol psychiatry 1997;38:581-586.
[PubMed]
40.
Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H: Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 2000;177:534-539.
[PubMed]
41.
Essau CA, Olaya B, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X, Pauli G, Gilvarry C, Bray D, O'callaghan J, Ollendick TH: Psychometric properties of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire from five European countries. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2012;21:232-245.
[PubMed]
42.
Carver CS: You Want to Measure Coping but Your Protocol's Too Long: Consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 1997;4:91-100.
[PubMed]
43.
Batthyány D, Müller KW, Benker F, Wölfling K: [Computer game playing: clinical characteristics of dependence and abuse among adolescents]. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009;121:502-509.
[PubMed]
44.
Wölfling K, Müller KW, Giralt S, Beutel ME: Emotionale Befindlichkeit und dysfunktionale Stressverarbeitung bei Personen mit Internetsucht. SUCHT 2011;57:27-37.
45.
Hormes JM, Kearns B, Timko CA: Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Addiction 2014;109:2079-2088.
[PubMed]
46.
Dreier M, Wölfling K, Duven E, Giralt S, Beutel ME, Müller KW: Free-to-play: About addicted Whales, at risk Dolphins and healthy Minnows. Monetarization design and Internet Gaming Disorder. Addict Behav 2017;64:328-333.
[PubMed]
47.
Kim, NR, Hwang SSH, Choi JS, Kim DJ, Demetrovics Z, Király O, Nagygyörgy K, Griffiths MD, Hyun SY, Youn HC, Choi SW: Characteristics and psychiatric symptoms of internet gaming disorder among adults using self-reported DSM-5 criteria. Psychiatry Investig 2016;13:58-66.
[PubMed]
48.
Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P: Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Comput Human Behav 2003;19:659-671.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2017
You do not currently have access to this content.
