Background/Aims: Crack users in the Netherlands are an ageing and diverse population with longstanding criminal careers. Our aim was to assess factors associated with current criminal involvement and specialization in selling drugs, property crime and violence. Method: A sample of 1,039 frequent crack users was recruited in three major Dutch cities, combining respondent-driven sampling with random institutional sampling. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to find factors associated with current criminality. Results: A total of 431 participants (41.5%) had engaged in crime in the past 30 days, mostly selling drugs (68.9%), followed by property crimes (34.4%) and a few cases of violent crime (9.7%). Younger age, homelessness, heavier patterns of use and a more prolific criminal justice history were associated with current criminality. Those receiving welfare benefits tended to be more likely to specialize only in selling drugs as opposed to (also) property crimes. Conclusion: Reducing drug use among criminally involved crack users and addressing their housing conditions could have a significant impact on reducing drug-related crime. Welfare benefits might act as protective factor against committing property crimes but not against the selling of drugs.

Keywords:
Crack use, Drug-related crime, Criminality factors
1.
Inciardi JA, Pottieger AE: Drug use and street crime in Miami: an (almost) twenty-year retrospective. Subst Use Misuse 1998;33:1839-1870.
2.
Johnson BD, Golub A, Fagan J: Careers in crack, drug use, drug distribution, and nondrug criminality. Crime Delinq 1995;41:275-295.
3.
Nurco DN: A long-term program of research on drug use and crime. Subst Use Misuse 1998;33:1817-1837.
4.
Tonry MH, Wilson JQ (eds): Drugs and Crime. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990.
5.
White HR, Gorman DM: Dynamics of the drug-crime relationship. Crim Justice 2000;1:1-218.
6.
Golub A: How much do Manhattan arrestees spend on drugs? Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;76:235-246.
7.
Harrison LD: The drug-crime nexus in the USA. Contemp Drug Probl 1992;19:203-245.
8.
Ball JC, Rosen L, Flueck JA, Nurco DN: Lifetime criminality of heroin addicts in the United States. J Drug Iss 1982;12:225-239.
9.
Collins JJ, Hubbard RL, Rachal JV: Expensive drug use and illegal income: a test of explanatory hypotheses. Criminology 1985;23:743-764.
10.
Bennett T, Holloway K: The causal connection between drug misuse and crime. Br J Criminol 2009;49:513-531.
11.
Tollenaar N, Van der Laan AM: Monitor veelplegers 2011. Trends in de populatie zeer actieve veelplegers uit de periode 2003-2008. The Hague, WODC, 2011.
12.
Van Laar M, Cruts G, van Gageldonk A, van Ooyen-Houben M, Croes E, Meijer R, et al: The Netherlands Drug Situation 2011. Utrecht, Trimbos Institute, 2012.
13.
Best D, Sidwell C, Gossop M, Harris J, Strang J: Crime and expenditure amongst polydrug misusers seeking treatment. Br J Criminol 2001;41:119.
14.
Goldstein PJ: The drugs/violence nexus: a tripartite conceptual framework. J Drug Iss 1985;39:143-174.
15.
Goldstein PJ: Drugs and violent crime; in Weiner NA, Wolfgang ME (eds): Pathways to Criminal Violence. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1989, pp 16-48.
16.
Hammersley R, Forsyte A, Morrison V, Davies JB: The relationship between crime and opioid use. Br J Addict 1989;84:1029-1043.
17.
Ball JC: The similarity of crime rates among male heroin addicts in New York City, Philadelphia and Baltimore. J Drug Iss 1991;21:413-427.
18.
Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR: Drugs and predatory crime; in Tonry M, Wilson JQ (eds): Drugs and Crime. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp 203-239.
19.
Ball JC, Ross A: The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients, Programs, Services, and Outcome. New York, Springer, 1991.
20.
Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Rolfe A: Reductions in acquisitive crime and drug use after treatment of addiction problems: 1-year follow-up outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000;58:165-172.
21.
Hall W, Bell J, Carless J: Crime and drug use among applicants for methadone maintenance. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993;31:123-129.
22.
Rogne Gjeruldsen S, Myrvang B, Opjordsmoen S: Criminality in drug addicts: a follow-up study over 25 years. Eur Addict Res 2004;10:49-55.
23.
Dijkgraaf MGW, Van Der Zanden BP, de Borgie CAJM, Blanken P, van Ree JM, van den Brink W: Cost utility analysis of co-prescribed heroin compared with methadone maintenance treatment in heroin addicts in two randomised trials. BMJ 2005;330:1297.
24.
Boles SM, Miotto K: Substance abuse and violence: a review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav 2003;8:155-174.
25.
Bushman BJ: Human aggression while under the influence of alcohol and other drugs: an integrative research review. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 1993;2:148-152.
26.
Pennings EJ, Leccese AP, Wolff FA: Effects of concurrent use of alcohol and cocaine. Addiction 2002;97:773-783.
27.
Fagan J, Chin KL: Violence as regulation and social control in the distribution of crack. Drugs and violence: causes, correlates, and consequences. NIDA Res Monogr 1990;103:8-43.
28.
Menard S, Mihalic S, Huizinga D: Drugs and crime revisited. Justice Quart 2001;18:269-299.
29.
Allen C: The links between heroin, crack cocaine and crime. B J Criminol 2005;45:355-372.
30.
Deitch D, Koutsenok I, Ruiz A: The relationship between crime and drugs: what we have learned in recent decades. J Psychoactive Drugs 2000;32:391-397.
31.
Greenberg SW, Adler F: Crime and addiction: an empirical analysis of the literature, 1920-1973. Comtemp Drug Probl 1974;3:221-270.
32.
Hough M, Mitchell D: Drug-Dependent Offenders and Justice for All. Confronting Crime: Crime Control Policy under New Labour. Devon, Willan Publishing 2003, pp 26-50.
33.
Walters GD: Drugs and Crime in Lifestyle Perspective. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1994, p 138.
34.
Welte JW, Zhang L, Wieczorek WF: The effects of substance use on specific types of criminal offending in young men. J Res Crime Delinq 2001;38:416-438.
35.
Moffitt TE: Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1993;100:674-701.
36.
Farrington DP: Age and crime. Crim Justice 1986;7:189-250.
37.
Gottfredson MR: A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1990.
38.
Sampson RJ, Laub JH: A life-course view of the development of crime. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2005;602:12-45.
39.
Eggleston EP, Laub JH: The onset of adult offending: a neglected dimension of the criminal career. J Crim Justice 2002;30:603-622.
40.
Gomez-Smith Z, Piquero AR: An examination of adult onset offending. J Crim Justice 2005;33:515-525.
41.
Preble E, Casey JJ: Taking care of business - the heroin user's life on the street. Subst Use Misuse 1969;4:1-24.
42.
Farabee D, Joshi V, Anglin MD: Addiction careers and criminal specialization. Crime Delinq 2001;47:196-220.
43.
Blanken P, Barendregt C, Zuidmulder L: The evolution of crack and basing cocaine in the Rotterdam heroin scene. J Drug Iss 1999;29:609-626.
44.
Bless R, Korf DJ, Freeman M: Open drug scenes: a cross-national comparison of concepts and urban strategies. Eur Addict Res 1995;1:128-138.
45.
Oteo Pérez A, Benschop A, Korf DJ: Buying and selling crack: transactions at the retail level and the role of user-sellers. J Drug Iss 2014;44:56-68.
46.
Van Rooij A, Schoenmakers TM, Van De Mheen D: Nationaal Prevalentie Onderzoek Middelengebruik 2009: de kerncijfers. (National Prevalence Study on Substance Use 2009: main statistics). Rotterdam, IVO, 2011.
47.
Coumans AM: Survival on the fringes of society: Marginalisation of and hardening among chronic heroin users; dissertation, University of Maastricht, 2005.
48.
Nabben T, Korf DJ: Cocaine and crack in Amsterdam: diverging subcultures. J Drug Iss 1999;29:627-651.
49.
Ouwehand AW, Kuipers WGT, Wisselink DJ, Van Delden EB: Kerncijfers Verslavingzorg 2009. Houten, Stichting Informatie Voorziening Zorg (SIVZ), 2010.
50.
Van der Poel A, van de Mheen D: Young people using crack and the process of marginalization. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2006;13:45-59.
51.
Pérez AO, Cruyff MJLF, Benschop A, Korf DJ: Estimating the prevalence of crack dependence using capture-recapture with institutional and field data: a three-city study in the Netherlands. Subst Use Misuse 2013;48:173-180.
52.
Wisselink DJ, Kuijpers WGT, Mol A: Kerncijfers Verslavingzorg 2012. Houten, Stichting Informatie Voorziening Zorg, 2012.
53.
Coumans M, Spreen M: Drug use and the role of homelessness in the process of marginalization. Subst Use Misuse 2003;38:311-338.
54.
McCarthy B, Hagan J: Homelessness: a criminogenic situation? Br J Criminol 1991;31:393-410.
55.
Oteo Pérez A, Korf DJ, Benschop A: Differential profiles of crack users in respondent-driven and institutional samples: a three-site comparison. Eur Addic Res 2012;18:192.
56.
Heckathorn DD: Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl 2002;49:11-34.
57.
Van den Brink W, Hendriks VM, Blanken P, Koeter MWJ, van Zwieten BJ, van Ree JM: Medical prescription of heroin to treatment resistant heroin addicts: two randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2003;327:310.
58.
Alders M: Classification of the population with a foreign background in the Netherlands. Paper for the Conference ‘The measure and mismeasure of populations: the statistical use of ethnic and racial categories in multicultural societies,' CERI-INED, Paris, 17-18 December 2001. Voorburg, Statistics Netherlands, 2001.
59.
Felson RB, Bonkiewicz L: Guns and trafficking in crack-cocaine and other drug markets. Crime Delinq 2013;59:319-343.
60.
Adler PA: Wheeling and dealing: an ethnography of an upper-level drug dealing and smuggling community. New York, Columbia University Press, 1993.
61.
Bean P: Street prostitution and drug taking; in Decorte T, Fountain J, Korf DJ, Kraus L, Wouters M (eds): The Meaning of High. Lengerich, Pabst, 2012, pp 118-131.
62.
Inciardi JA, Lockwood D, Pottieger AE: Women and Crack-Cocaine. New York, Prentice Hall, 1993.
63.
Vaughn MG, Fu Q, Perron BE, Bohnert ASB, Howard MO: Is crack cocaine use associated with greater violence than powdered cocaine use? Results from a national sample. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010;36:181-186.
64.
Paim Kessler FH, Barbosa Terra M, Faller S, Ravy Stolf A, Carolina Peuker A, Benzano D, et al: Crack users show high rates of antisocial personality disorder, engagement in illegal activities and other psychosocial problems. Am J on Addic 2012;21:370-380.
65.
Rounsaville BJ: Rationale and guidelines for using comparable measures to evaluate substance abusers: an overview; in Rounsaville BJ, Tims FM, Horton AM, Sowder BJ (eds): Diagnostic source book on drug abuse research and treatment. Rockville, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1993, pp 1-10.
66.
Thornberry TP, Krohn MD: The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime; in Duffee D, Crutchfield RD, Mastrofski S, Mazerolle L, McDowall D, Ostrom B (eds): Innovations in Measurement and Analysis. Washington, National Institute of Justice, 2000, pp 33-83.
67.
Webb VJ, Katz CM, Decker SH: Assessing the validity of self-reports by gang members: results from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program. Crime Delinq 2006;52:232-252.
68.
Blanken P, van den Brink W, Hendriks VM, Huijsman IA, Klous MG, Rook EJ, et al: Heroin-assisted treatment in The Netherlands: history, findings, and international context. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:S105-S158.
69.
Grapendaal M: Cutting their coat according to their cloth: economic behavior of Amsterdam opiate users. Subst Use Misuse 1992;27:487-501.
70.
Stoever H: Crack cocaine in Germany: current state of affairs. J Drug Iss 2002;32:413-421.
71.
Gossop M, Griffiths P, Powis B, Strang J: Cocaine: Patterns of use, route of administration, and severity of dependence. Br J Psychiatry 1994;164:660-664.
72.
Castells X, Casas M, Perez-Maña C, Roncero C, Vidal X, Capellà D: Efficacy of psychostimulant drugs for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;17:CD007380.
73.
Herin DV, Rush CR, Grabowski J: Agonist-like pharmacotherapy for stimulant dependence: preclinical, human laboratory, and clinical studies. Ann NY Acad Sci 2010;1187:76-100.
74.
van Den Brink W: Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of substance use disorders and pathological gambling. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2012;5:3.
75.
Nuijten M, Blanken P, van den Brink W, Hendriks V: Cocaine addiction treatments to improve control and reduce harm (CATCH): new pharmacological treatment options for crack-cocaine dependence in The Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry 2011;11:135.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.