Abstract
This study aims to analyze psychometric properties and validity of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) and the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) and, second, to determine a threshold for the CIUS which matches the IAT cut-off for detecting problematic Internet use. A total of 292 subjects with problematic or pathological gambling (237 men, 55 women) aged 14-63 years and with private Internet use for at least 1 h per working or weekend day were recruited via different recruitment channels. Results include that both scales were internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.9) and had satisfactory convergent validity (r = 0.75; 95% CI 0.70-0.80). The correlation with duration of private Internet use per week was significantly higher for the CIUS (r = 0.54) compared to the IAT (r = 0.40). Among all participants, 25.3% were classified as problematic Internet users based on the IAT with a cut-off ≥40. The highest proportion of congruent classified cases results from a CIUS cut-off ≥18 (sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 79.4%). However, a higher cut-off (≥21) seems to be more appropriate for prevalence estimation of problematic Internet use.
Journal Section:
Editor's choice
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association (ASA): Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, APA, 2000.
2.
O'Brian C: Commentary on Tao et al. (2010): Internet addiction and DSM-V. Addiction 2010;105:565.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (ASA): Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 5. Washington, APA, 2013.
4.
Griffiths M: Does Internet and computer ‘addiction' exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychol Behav 2000;3:211-218.
5.
Beard KW: Internet addiction: a review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:7-14.
[PubMed]
6.
Shaw M, Black DW: Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs 2008;22:353-365.
[PubMed]
7.
Aboujaoude E, Koran LM, Gamel N, Large MD, Serpe RT: Potential markers for problematic Internet use: a telephone survey of 2,513 adults. CNS Spectr 2006;11:750-755.
[PubMed]
8.
Leung L: Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the Internet as predictors of online activities and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004;7:333-348.
[PubMed]
9.
Young KS: Caught in the net: how to recognize the Signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York, Wiley, 1998.
10.
Young KS: Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1:237-244.
11.
Meerkerk GJ, Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Vermulst AA, Garretsen HFL: The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:1-6.
[PubMed]
12.
Meerkerk GJ: Pwned by the Internet: explorative research into the causes and consequences of compulsive Internet use. Rotterdam 2007. http://www.Internetondercontrole.nl/research/gepubliceerde-onderzoeken/pwned-bythe-internet (accessed November 2, 2011).
13.
Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Rezapour H: Validity, reliability and factor analysis of Compulsive Internet Use Scale in students Internet users of Isfahan's universities, abstract 2011. http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/204 (accessed November 1, 2011).
14.
Meyer C, Bischof A, Westram A, Jeske C, de Brito S, Glorius S, Schoen D, Porz S, Guertler D, Kastirke N, Hayer T, Jacobi F, Lucht M, Premper V, Gilberg R, Hess D, Bischof G, John U, Rumpf H: Pathological Gambling and Epidemiology' (PAGE) study program: design and fieldwork. Int J Method Psych (submitted).
15.
Netemeyer RG, Burton S, Cole LK, Williamson DA, Zucker N, Bertman L, Diefenbach G: Characteristics and beliefs associated with probable pathological gambling: a pilot study with implications for the national gambling impact and policy commission. J Public Policy Mark 1998;17:147-160.
16.
Grant JE, Kim SW: Comorbidity of impulse control disorders in pathological gamblers. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003;108:203-207.
[PubMed]
17.
Grant JE, Steinberg MA: Compulsive sexual behavior and pathological gambling. Sex Addict Compuls 2005;12:235-244.
18.
Griffiths M: Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6:557-568.
[PubMed]
19.
WHO: The World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI v21.1.1). Gambling section, 1990. http://hcp.med.harvard.edu/wmhcidi/instruments_capi.php (accessed February 2, 2012).
20.
Guertler D, Broda A, Bischof A, Kastirke N, Meerkerk GJ, John U, Meyer C, Rumpf HJ: Factor structure of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS). Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, E-pub ahead of print.
21.
Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Atwi K, Zullino D, Khan R, Billieux J: Arabic validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2011;6:32.
[PubMed]
22.
Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Horn A, Achab S, Thorens G, Zullino D, Billieux J: French validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS). Psychiatr Q 2012;83:397-405.
[PubMed]
23.
Lee K, Lee HK, Gyeong H, Yu B, Song YM, Kim D: Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Internet Addiction Test among college students. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28:763-768.
[PubMed]
24.
Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, Theintz F, Lederrey J, Van Der Linden M, Zullino D: French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:703-706.
[PubMed]
25.
Korkeila J, Kaarlas S, Jaaskelainen M, Vahlberg T, Taiminen T: Attached to the web harmful use of the Internet and its correlates. Eur Psychiatry 2010;25:236-241.
[PubMed]
26.
Barke A, Nyenhuis N, Kröner-Herwig B: The German version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15:534-542.
[PubMed]
27.
Widyanto L, McMurran M: The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004;7:443-450.
[PubMed]
28.
StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, StataCorp LP, 2007.
[PubMed]
29.
Feldt LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih FA: Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Appl Psychol Meas 1987;11:93-103.
30.
Whitney DR, Sabers DL: Improving essay examinations. III. Use of item analysis. University of Iowa, University Evaluation and Examination Service, Iowa City. Tech Bull 1970;11.
31.
Meng X, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB: Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 1992;111:172-175.
32.
Craighead WE, Nemeroff CB: The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science, ed 3. New York, Wiley, 2004.
33.
Goldstein G, Hersen M: Handbook of Psychological Assessment, ed 2. Oxford, Elsevier Science, 2000.
34.
Widyanto L, Griffiths MD, Brunsden V: A psychometric comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-related Problem Scale, and self-diagnosis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011;14:141-149.
[PubMed]
35.
Meerkerk GJ, Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Garretsen HFL: Predicting compulsive Internet use: it's all about sex! Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9:95-103.
[PubMed]
36.
Ha J, Yu JH, Park DH, Ryu SH, Kim SJ: Usefulness of Young's Internet Addiction Test for clinical populations. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2012;22:S410.
[PubMed]
37.
Belanger RE, Akre C, Berchtold A, Michaud PA: A U-shaped association between intensity of Internet use and adolescent health. Pediatrics 2011;127:330-335.
[PubMed]
38.
Grohol JM: Too much time online: Internet addiction or healthy social interactions? Cyberpsychol Behav 1999;2:395-401.
[PubMed]
39.
Griffiths M, Wardle H, Orford J, Sproston K, Erens B: Sociodemographic correlates of Internet gambling: findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:199-202.
[PubMed]
40.
Tsitsika A, Critselis E, Janikian M, Kormas G, Kafetzis DA: Association between Internet gambling and problematic Internet use among adolescents. J Gambl Stud 2011;27:389-400.
[PubMed]
41.
Blume S: Pathological gambling and switching addictions: report of case. J Gambl Stud 1994;10:87-96.
42.
Hahn A, Jerusalem M: Internetsucht: Reliabilität und Validität in der Online-Forschung (Internet Addiction: Reliability and Validity in Online Research); in Theobald A, Dreyer M, Starsetzki T (eds): Online-Marktforschung: Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (Online Market Research: Contributions from Research and Practice). Wiesbaden, Gabler, 2001, pp 161-186.
43.
Jelenchick L, Becker T, Moreno MA: Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Res 2012;196:296-301.
[PubMed]
44.
Willis BH: Spectrum bias - why clinicians need to be cautious when applying diagnostic test studies. Fam Pract 2008;25:390-396.
[PubMed]
45.
Davis RA: A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Hum Behav 2001;17:187-195.
46.
Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Schachtle U, Scholer T, Altstotter-Gleich C: Watching pornographic pictures on the Internet: role of sexual arousal ratings and psychological-psychiatric symptoms for using Internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011;14:371-377.
[PubMed]
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2013
You do not currently have access to this content.
