Background: Previous studies on Internet addiction point towards a particular constellation of personality traits and deficits in social competence of players addicted to massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs), which are hypothesized to result from impairments in self-concept. The aim of this study was to examine differences in self-concept and degree of avatar identification in World of Warcraft addicted, non-addicted and naive (nonexperienced) participants. Methods: Participants (n = 45) completed interviews and self-report questionnaires on social, emotional and physical aspects of self-concept. Attributes of participants’ ‘actual self’, ‘ideal self’ and their avatar were assessed using the Giessen test. The extent of avatar identification was examined by assessing differences between ‘ideal self’ and avatar evaluations. Results: In contrast to nonaddicted and naive participants, addicted players showed a more negative body appraisal and lower self-esteem as well as lower permeability, social response, general mood and social potency on the Giessen test subscales. They further showed significantly lower discrepancies between ‘ideal self’ and avatar ratings on nearly all Giessen test subscales. Discussion: The results point towards impairments in self-concept and a higher degree in avatar identification in addicted MMORPG players compared to the remaining participants. These results could have important implications for the treatment of addicted MMORPG players.

Keywords:
Self-concept, Massively multiplayer online role-playing game players, Avatar identification
1.
Internet World Stats (IWS): World internet usage and population statistics. 2011. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
2.
Lee MS, Ko YH, Song HS, Kwon KH, Lee HS, Nam M, Jung IK: Characteristics of Internet use in relation to game genre in Korean adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007;10:278–285.
3.
Rehbein F, Kleimann M, Mössle ET: Computerspielabhängigkeit im Kindes- und Jugendalter: Empirische Befunde zu Ursachen, Diagnostik und Komorbiditäten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung spielimmanenter Abhängigkeitsmerkmale (KFN-Forschungsbericht; Nr: 108). Hannover, KFN, 2009.
4.
Schorp B, Keilhauer J, Würfel M, Kiessling M: Medienkonvergenz Monitoring Report 2008. Jugendliche in konvergierenden Medienwelten. http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~umfmed/Medienkonvergenz_Monitoring_Report08.pdf (accessed May 21, 2008).
5.
Peters CS, Malesky LA: Problematic usage among highly-engaged players of massively multiplayer online role playing games. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:481–484.
6.
Wölfling K, Grüsser SM: Addicted to computer games (in German). MMW Fortschr Med 2008;150:35–36.
7.
Seay AF, Jerome WJ, Lee KS, Kraut RE: Project Massive: a study of online gaming communities; in: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, ACM Press, 2004.
8.
Williams D: Trouble in River City: The Social Life of Video Games; unpubl. doctoral dissertation; Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 2004.
9.
Wan CS, Chiou WB: Why are adolescents addicted to online gaming? An interview study in Taiwan. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9:762–766.
10.
Zanetta DF, Zermatten A, Billieux J, Thorens G, Bondolfi G, Zullino D, et al: Motivations to play specifically predict excessive involvement in massively multiplayer online role-playing games: evidence from an online survey. Eur Addict Res 2011;17:185–189.
11.
Turkle S: Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of the Freudian century. Sociol Inq 1997;67:72–84.
12.
Bessière K, Seay AF, Kiesler S: The ideal elf: identity exploration in World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007;10:530–535.
13.
Smahel D, Blinka L, Ledabyl O: Playing MMORPGs: connections between addiction and identifying with a character. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:715–718.
14.
Deusinger IM: ‘Locus of control’ – ein Elbstkonzept; in Deusinger IM (ed): Kognitionsforschung; Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Fritz Süllwold. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1996, pp 86–110.
15.
Higgins ET: Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychol Rev 1987;94:319–340.
16.
Davis RA: A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Comput Human Behav 2001;17:187–195.
17.
Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CC, Yen CN, Chen SH: Screening for Internet addiction: an empirical study on cut-off points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2005;21:545–551.
18.
Beckmann D, Brähler E, and Richter HE: Der Giessen-Test (GT). Bern, Huber, 1990.
19.
Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen SH, Yang MJ, Lin HC, Yen CF: Proposed diagnostic criteria and the screening and diagnosing tool of Internet addiction in college students. Compr Psychiatry 2009;50:378–384.
20.
Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CS, Chen CC: The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. Eur Psychiatry 2012;27:1–8.
21.
Klaiberg A: GT. Giessen-Test; in Brähler E, Schumacher J, Strauss B (eds): In Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 2002, pp 172–175.
22.
Wischmann T: Giessen-Test (GT); in Brähler E, Holling H, Leutner D, Petermann F (eds): Handbuch psychologischer und pädagogischer Test. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 2002, pp 661–662.
23.
Roth M, Körner A, Herzberg PY: Typological and dimensional approach at comparing the Giessen test (GT) with the NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory (NEO-FFI). GMS Psychosoc Med 2008;5:Doc06.
24.
Clement U, Löwe B: Die Validierung des FKB-20 als Instrument zur Erfassung von Körperbildstörungen bei psychosomatischen Patienten. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie 1996;46:254–159.
25.
Rindermann H: Emotionale-Kompetenz-Fragebogen; Göttigen, Hogrefe, 2009.
26.
Rosenberg MJ: Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1965.
27.
Neiss MB, Sedikires C, Stevenson J: Self-esteem: a behavioural genetic perspective, 446. Eur J Pers 2002;16:351–367.
28.
Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CS, Yeh YC, Yen CF: Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for internet addiction in adolescents: a 2-year prospective study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:937–943.
29.
Küfner H, Bühringer G: Alkoholismus; in Hahlweg K, Ehlers A (eds): Psychische Störungen und ihre Behandlungen. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1997, pp 437–512.
30.
Cao F, Su L, Liu T, Gao X: The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Eur Psychiatry 2007;22:466–471.
31.
Whang LS, Lee S, Chang G: Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: a behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6:143–150.
32.
Preuss UW, Rujescu D, Giegling I, Watzke S, Koller G, Zetzsche T, Meisenzahl EM, Soyka M, Moller HJ: Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (in German). Nervenarzt 2008;79:305–319.
33.
Wölfling K, Lemenager T: Therapie der Computerspiel- und Internetsucht. Sucht 2011;57:313–321.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.