While psychiatric comorbidity has been shown to produce a negative impact on the outcome of opioid use disorders, longitudinal studies carried out in the context of methadone maintenance treatment programs (MMTP) to evaluate outcomes strictly linked to methadone efficacy have not demonstrated a similar negative influence. To verify whether results obtained considering psychopathology in terms of formal psychiatric diagnoses were replicated when assessing psychopathology in terms of global psychiatric severity, a retrospective cohort study was designed. 259 patients commencing methadone maintenance treatment were divided into two groups on the basis of SCL-90 severity score and compared for retention in treatment, toxicological urine test results and psychological/psychiatric status throughout a one year period of observation. The results of the study suggest that patients in MMTP with high psychiatric severity are not characterized by a lower retention in treatment or higher substance use than those with low psychiatric severity. Moreover, during treatment high severe psychiatric patient status appears to improve significantly for all psychological/psychiatric dimensions explored by SCL-90. These results are consistent with those obtained in previous studies on the efficacy of MMTP, comprehensive of psychiatric care, irrespective of the severity of psychopathology exhibited by patients at the beginning of treatment.

Keywords:
Comorbidity, Opioids, Methadone maintenance, Treatment outcome, Addiction psychiatry
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.