Abstract
Introduction: Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is optimal for treating sigmoid colon and rectal cancers is controversial. The present study aimed to compare outcomes of high and low ligation of the IMA and determine the adequate extent of IMA lymph node dissection. Methods: Subjects were 455 consecutive stage I–III colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between 2011 and 2019. We assessed the association between the level of IMA ligation and overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by propensity score matching analysis. Clinicopathological features of IMA lymph node metastasis and recurrence patterns were analyzed. Results: After propensity score matching, the low ligation group had a significantly worse prognosis than that of the high ligation group for RFS (p = 0.039). Positive IMA lymph nodes were associated with pathological T3 or T4 stage and N2 stage. IMA lymph node recurrences in the high ligation group occurred at the superior left side of the IMA root. In contrast, all recurrences in the low ligation group occurred at the left colic artery bifurcation. Conclusion: High ligation of IMA is oncologically safe. However, even with high ligation, care must be taken to ensure adequate lymph node dissection.
Journal Section:
Research Article
References
1.
AJCC
AJCC Cancer staging manual
New York
Springer
2018
.2.
UICC
TNM Classification of malignant tumours
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2017
.3.
Hashiguchi
Y
, Muro
K
, Saito
Y
, Ito
Y
, Ajioka
Y
, Hamaguchi
T
. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer
. Int J Clin Oncol
. 2020
;25
:1
–42
.4.
Shida
D
, Kanemitsu
Y
, Hamaguchi
T
, Shimada
Y
. Introducing the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification as relevant to colorectal cancer, anal cancer and appendiceal cancer: a comparison study with the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis and the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma
. Jpn J Clin Oncol
. 2019
;49
(4
):321
–8
.5.
Huh
JW
, Kim
YJ
, Kim
HR
. Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer
. Ann Surg
. 2012
;255
(1
):70
–8
.6.
Steup
WH
, Moriya
Y
, van de Velde
CJ
. Patterns of lymphatic spread in rectal cancer. A topographical analysis on lymph node metastases
. Eur J Cancer
. 2002
;38
(7
):911
–8
.7.
Ubukata
M
, Itabashi
M
, Kameoka
S
. Japanese D3 lymph node dissection in low rectal cancer with inferior mesenteric lymph node metastases
. World J Surg
. 2014
;38
(10
):2724
–9
.8.
Wang
XJ
, Chi
P
, Lin
HM
, Lu
XR
, Huang
Y
, Xu
ZB
. A scoring system to predict inferior mesenteric artery lymph node metastasis and prognostic value of its involvement in rectal cancer
. Int J Colorectal Dis
. 2014
;29
(3
):293
–300
.9.
Kanemitsu
Y
, Hirai
T
, Komori
K
, Kato
T
. Survival benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid colon or rectal cancer surgery
. Br J Surg
. 2006
;93
(5
):609
–15
.10.
Kawada
H
, Kurita
N
, Nakamura
F
, Kawamura
J
, Hasegawa
S
, Kotake
K
. Incorporation of apical lymph node status into the seventh edition of the TNM classification improves prediction of prognosis in stage III colonic cancer
. Br J Surg
. 2014
;101
(9
):1143
–52
.11.
Mari
GM
, Crippa
J
, Cocozza
E
, Berselli
M
, Livraghi
L
, Carzaniga
P
. Low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer reduces genitourinary dysfunction: results from a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW trial)
. Ann Surg
. 2019
;269
(6
):1018
–24
.12.
Si
MB
, Yan
PJ
, Du
ZY
, Li
LY
, Tian
HW
, Jiang
WJ
. Lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
. Int J Colorectal Dis
. 2019
;34
(6
):947
–62
.13.
Draginov
A
, Chesney
TR
, Quereshy
HA
, Chadi
SA
, Quereshy
FA
. Association of high ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after minimally invasive surgery for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer
. Surg Endosc
. 2020
;34
(10
):4593
–600
.14.
Fujii
S
, Ishibe
A
, Ota
M
, Suwa
H
, Watanabe
J
, Kunisaki
C
. Short-term and long-term results of a randomized study comparing high tie and low tie inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection: subanalysis of the HTLT (High tie vs. low tie) study
. Surg Endosc
. 2019
;33
(4
):1100
–10
.15.
Hajibandeh
S
, Hajibandeh
S
, Maw
A
. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery
. Dis Colon Rectum
. 2020
;63
(7
):988
–99
.16.
Moynihan
BG
. The surgical treatment of cancer of the sigmoid flexure and rectum
. Surg Gynecol Obstet
. 1908
;6
:463
.17.
Fujii
S
, Ishibe
A
, Ota
M
, Watanabe
K
, Watanabe
J
, Kunisaki
C
. Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer
. BJS Open
. 2018
;2
(4
):195
–202
.18.
Matsuda
K
, Hotta
T
, Takifuji
K
, Yokoyama
S
, Oku
Y
, Watanabe
T
. Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery
. Br J Surg
. 2015
;102
(5
):501
–8
.19.
Matsuda
K
, Yokoyama
S
, Hotta
T
, Takifuji
K
, Watanabe
T
, Tamura
K
. Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery with high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery
. Gastrointest Tumors
. 2017
4
1–2
45
52
.20.
Park
SS
, Park
B
, Park
EY
, Park
SC
, Kim
MJ
, Sohn
DK
. Outcomes of high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with lymph node dissection for distal sigmoid colon or rectal cancer
. Surg Today
. 2020
;50
(6
):560
–8
.21.
Feng
W
, Zong
Y
, Zhao
J
, Li
W
, Miao
Y
, Xu
Z
. High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a prospective study of surgical and oncological outcomes
. J Surg Oncol
. 2021
123
Suppl 1
S76
80
.22.
Kruszewski
WJ
, Szajewski
M
, Ciesielski
M
, Buczek
T
, Kawecki
K
, Walczak
J
. Level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation does not affect rectal cancer treatment outcomes despite better cancer-specific survival after low ligation-randomized trial results
. Colorectal Dis
. 2021
;23
(10
):2575
–83
.23.
Sekimoto
M
, Takemasa
I
, Mizushima
T
, Ikeda
M
, Yamamoto
H
, Doki
Y
. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery
. Surg Endosc
. 2011
;25
(3
):861
–6
.24.
Sato
K
, Sato
T
. Topographical relationship of the lymph nodes surrounding the abdominal aorta, the inferior mesenteric artery, and the superior hypogastric plexus
. J Jpn Soc Coloproctol
. 1989
;42
(7
):1178
–92
.25.
Cirocchi
R
, Randolph
J
, Cheruiyot
I
, Davies
JR
, Wheeler
J
, Lancia
M
. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the anatomical variants of the left colic artery
. Colorectal Dis
. 2020 Jul
22
7
768
78
.© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.
