Background: Numerous screening tools have been reported to aid in diagnosing appendicitis, but have poor severity prediction and lack accurate estimation of postoperative complications or total length of hospital stay (LOS). Aim: This study aims at evaluating the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio in predicting the severity of appendicitis, LOS and 30-day complication rates. Methods: Patients who underwent appendicectomy over a 4-year period were evaluated. Demographics, blood results, severity of appendicitis, LOS and 30-day complications were recorded. Recommended cut-off values of NLR and C-reactive protein (CRP) for severity of appendicitis were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The Mann-Whitney test was performed to assess the correlations between LOS and 30-day complications with NLR. Results: A total of 663 patients were included in the study of which 57.3% (n = 380) were male with mean patient age of 23.6 years, and 461 appendix specimens (69.6%) had simple inflammation on histological evaluation. A NLR of >6.35 or CRP of >55.6 were statistically associated with severe acute appendicitis, with a median of one extra hospital day admission (p < 0.0001). Mean NLR was statistically higher in patients with postoperative co(13.69 for severe vs. 7.29 for simple appendicitis group, p = 0.016). Conclusion: We advocate that NLR is a useful adjunct in predicting severity of appendicitis. It aids in delineating severe inflammation requiring surgery without substantial delay.

Keywords:
Postoperative outcomes, Appendicitis, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
1.
Park HC, Kim MJ, Lee BH: The outcome of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis with diameters ≤10 mm. Int J Surg 2014;12:897-900.
2.
Andersson RE: The role of antibiotic therapy in the management of acute appendicitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2013;15:10-13.
3.
Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR: Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337-348.
4.
Rothrock SG, Pagane J: Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:39-51.
5.
Shimizu T, Ishizuka M, Kubota K: A lower neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is closely associated with catarrhal appendicitis versus severe appendicitis. Surg Today 2015, Epub ahead of print.
6.
Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC: What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 2003;185:198-201.
7.
Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al: Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010;51:220-225.
8.
Jang SO, Kim BS, Moon DJ: [Application of alvarado score in patients with suspected appendicitis]. Korean J Gastroenterol 2008;52:27-31.
9.
Brigand C, Steinmetz JP, Rohr S: [The usefulness of scores in the diagnosis of appendicitis]. J Chir (Pairs) 2009;146:2-7.
10.
Kuon Lee S, Chul Lee S, Park JW, Kim SJ: The utility of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting severe cholecystitis: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2014;14:100.
11.
Ishizuka M, Shimizu T, Kubota K: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has a close association with gangrenous appendicitis in patients undergoing appendectomy. Int Surg 2012;97:299-304.
12.
Acarturk G, Acay A, Demir K, Ulu MS, Ahsen A, Yuksel S: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in inflammatory bowel disease - As a new predictor of disease severity. Bratisl Lek Listy 2015;116:213-217.
13.
Posul E, Yilmaz B, Aktas G, Kurt M: Does neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict active ulcerative colitis? Wien Klin Wochenschr 2015;127:262-265.
14.
Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, et al: Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:653-657.
15.
Galizia G, Lieto E, Zamboli A, De Vita F, Castellano P, Romano C, Auricchio A, Cardella F, De Stefano L, Orditura M: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a strong predictor of tumor recurrence in early colon cancers: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surgery 2015;158:112-120.
16.
Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, Zhang JF, Wang WL, Zhu Y, et al: Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2014;134:2403-2413.
17.
Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, et al: Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju124.
18.
Cho H, Hur HW, Kim SW, et al: Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer and predicts survival after treatment. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009;58:15-23.
19.
Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M: The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 2007;73:215-220.
20.
Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, et al: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 2009;96:473-481.
21.
Heinrich PC, Castell JV, Andus T: Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. Biochem J 1990;265:621-636.
22.
Shafi SM, Afsheen M, Reshi FA: Total leucocyte count, C-reactive protein and neutrophil count: diagnostic aid in acute appendicitis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2009;15:117-120.
23.
Tan WJ, Acharyya S, Goh YC, Chan WH, Wong WK, Ooi LL, Ong HS: Prospective comparison of the alvarado score and CT scan in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis: a proposed algorithm to guide CT use. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:218-224.
24.
Varadhan KK, Humes DJ, Neal KR, Lobo DN: Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 2010;34:199-209.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.