Background: Surgery for Abdominal Rectus Diastasis (ARD) is a controversial topic and some argue that it is solely an aesthetic problem. Many symptoms in these patients are indefinite, and no objective criteria have been established, indicating which patients are likely to benefit from surgery. This study investigated the correlation between preoperative assessment and intraoperative measurement of ARD width, and objective measurements of muscle strength. Methods: 57 patients undergoing surgery for ARD underwent preoperative assessment of ARD width by clinical measurement and CT scan, and thereafter intraoperative measurement. Abdominal muscle strength was investigated using the Biodex System 4 including flexion, extension and isometric measurements. Correlations were calculated by the Spearman test. Results: Intraoperative ARD width between the umbilicus and the symphysis correlated strongly with Biodex measurements during flexion (p = 0.007, R = -0.35) and isometric work load (p = 0.01, R = -0.34). The following measurements showed no correlation: between muscle strength and BMI; muscle strength and waistline; or between muscle strength and ARD width above the umbilicus, assessed preoperatively at the outpatient clinic, by CT scan, or measured intraoperatively. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between intraoperatively measured ARD width below the umbilicus and flexion and isometric abdominal muscle strength measured with the Biodex System 4.

1.
Akram J, Matzen SH: Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014;48:163-169.
2.
Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K, Stark B: Early complications, pain, and quality of life after reconstructive surgery for abdominal rectus muscle diastasis: a 3-month follow-up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:1082-1088.
3.
Clay L, Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K: Validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of pain following ventral hernia repair - the VHPQ. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:1219-1224.
4.
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-263.
5.
Stark B, Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K: Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:102-105.
6.
Emanuelsson P, Dahlstrand U, Strömsten U, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K, Stark B: Analysis of the abdominal musculo-aponeurotic anatomy in rectus diastasis: comparison of CT scanning and preoperative clinical assessment with direct measurement intraoperatively. Hernia 2014;18:465-471.
7.
Gunnarsson U, Johansson M, Strigård K: Assessment of abdominal muscle function using the Biodex System-4. Validity and reliability in healthy volunteers and patients with giant ventral hernia. Hernia 2011;15:417-421.
8.
Liaw LJ, Hsu MJ, Liao CF, Liu MF, Hsu AT: The relationships between inter-recti distance measured by ultrasound imaging and abdominal muscle function in postpartum women: a 6-month follow-up study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:435-443.
9.
Gracovetsky S, Farfan H, Helleur C: The abdominal mechanism. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:317-324.
10.
Toranto IR: Resolution of back pain with the wide abdominal rectus plication abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:777-779.
11.
Oneal RM, Mulka JP, Shapiro P, Hing D, Cavaliere C: Wide abdominal rectus plication abdominoplasty for the treatment of chronic intractable low back pain. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:225-231.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.