Introduction: Diagnostic practice for acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department varies widely and is mostly based on doctor's preferences. We aimed at developing an evidence-based guideline for the diagnostic pathway of patients with abdominal pain of non-traumatic origin. Methods: All available international literature on patients with acute abdominal pain was identified and graded according to their methodological quality by members of the multidisciplinary steering group. A guideline was synthetized, providing evidence-based recommendations together with considerations based on expertise of group members, patient preferences, costs, availability of facilities, and organizational aspects. Conclusions and Recommendations: Definition: Uniform terminology is needed in patients with acute abdominal pain to avoid difficulty in interpretation and ease comparison of findings between studies. We propose the use of the following definition for acute abdominal pain: pain of nontraumatic origin with a maximum duration of 5 days. Clinical diagnosis: Clinical evaluation is advised to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent causes. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment is insufficient to identify the correct diagnosis but can discriminate between urgent and nonurgent causes. Patients suspected of nonurgent diagnoses can safely be reevaluated the next day. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the differences in accuracy between residents and specialists. No conclusions can be drawn on the influence of a gynecological consultation. In patients suspected of an urgent condition, additional imaging is justified. CRP and WBC count alone are insufficient to discriminate urgent from nonurgent diagnoses. Diagnostic imaging: There is no place for conventional radiography in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain due to the lack of added value on top of clinical assessment. Computed tomography leads to the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with acute abdominal pain. Positive predictive value of ultrasound is comparable with CT and therefore preferred as the first imaging modality due to the downsides of computed tomography; negative or inconclusive ultrasound is followed by CT. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the added value of a diagnostic laparoscopy in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain. Antibiotic treatment should be started within the first hour after recognition of sepsis. Administration of opioids (analgesics) decreases the intensity of the pain and does not affect the accuracy of physical examination.

Keywords:
Acute abdomen, Abdominal pain, Diagnostic accuracy, Guideline
1.
Kamin RA, Nowicki TA, Courtney DS, Powers RD: Pearls and pitfalls in the emergency department evaluation of abdominal pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2003;21:61-72, vi.
2.
Lameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP, van Ramshorst B, Bouma WH, et al: Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ 2009;338:b2431.
3.
Hastings RS, Powers RD: Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:711-716.
4.
van Everdingen JJE, Burgers JS, Assendelft WJJ, Swinkels JA, van Barneveld TA, van de Klundert JLM: Evidence based richtlijn ontwikkeling. Houten, Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 2004.
5.
Laméris W, van Randen A, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA: Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): design and rationale. BMC Emerg Med 2007;7:9.
6.
Kraemer M, Yang Q, Ohmann C; Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group: Classification of subpopulations with a minor and a major diagnostic problem in acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1993;8:6-14.
7.
Hancock DM, Heptinstall M, Old JM, Lobo FX: Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. The practical impact of a ‘theoretical exercise'. Theor Surg 1987;2:99-105.
8.
Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U: Diagnostic pitfalls and accuracy of diagnosis in acute abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006;41:1126-1131.
9.
Pines J, Uscher Pines L, Hall A, Hunter J, Srinivasan R, Ghaemmaghami C: The interrater variation of ED abdominal examination findings in patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:483-487.
10.
Bjerregaard B, Brynitz S, Holst-Christensen J, Jess P, Kalaja E, Lund-Kristensen J, et al: The reliability of medical history and physical examination in patients with acute abdominal pain. Methods Inf Med 1983;22:15-18.
11.
Toorenvliet BR, Bakker RF, Flu HC, Merkus JW, Hamming JF, Breslau PJ: Standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients not admitted to the hospital after emergency department evaluation for acute abdominal pain. World J Surg 2010;34:480-486.
12.
Goransson J, Larsson A: Plasma levels of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute abdominal disease. Surg Res Comm 1991;11:107-118.
13.
Chi CH, Shiesh SC, Chen KW, Wu MH, Lin XZ: C-reactive protein for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:254-256.
14.
Chase CW, Barker DE, Russell WL, Burns RP: Serum amylase and lipase in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain. Am Surg 1996;62:1028-1033.
15.
MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT, Claypool HA, Keenan S, Katz DS, et al: Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology 2005;237:114-122.
16.
Prasannan S, Zhueng TJ, Gul YA: Diagnostic value of plain abdominal radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain. Asian J Surg 2005;28:246-251.
17.
Lameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP, van Ramshorst B, Bouma WH, et al: Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ 2009;339:b2431.
18.
van Randen A, Laméris W, Luitse JS, Gorzeman M, Hesselink EJ, Dolmans DE, et al: The role of plain radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:582-589.e2.
19.
Lindelius A, Törngren S, Sondén A, Pettersson H, Adami J: Impact of surgeon-performed ultrasound on diagnosis of abdominal pain. Emerg Med J 2008;25:486-491.
20.
Allemann F, Cassina P, Röthlin M, Largiadèr F: Ultrasound scans done by surgeons for patients with acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 1999;165:966-970.
21.
Nural MS, Ceyhan M, Baydin A, Genc S, Bayrak IK, Elmali M: The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. Intern Emerg Med 2008;3:349-354.
22.
Tsushima Y, Yamada S, Aoki J, Motojima T, Endo K: Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol 2002;57:507-513.
23.
Foinant M, Lipiecka E, Buc E, Boire JY: Impact of computed tomography on patient's care in nontraumatic acute abdomen: 90 patients. J Radiol 2008;88:559-566.
24.
Udayasankar UK, Li J, et al: Acute abdominal pain: value of non-contrast enhanced ultra-low-dose multi-detector row CT as a substitute for abdominal radiographs. Emerg Radiol 2009;16:61-70.
25.
Salem TA, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ: Prospective study on the role of the CT scan in patients with an acute abdomen. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:460-466.
26.
Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH: Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 2010;256:21-28.
27.
Rudnick M, Feldman H: Contrast-induced nephropathy: what are the true clinical consequences? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:263-272.
28.
Rao QA, Newhouse JH: Risk of nephropathy after intravenous administration of contrast material: a critical literature analysis. Radiology 2006;239:392-397.
29.
Stratta P, Bozzola C, Quaglia M: Pitfall in nephrology: contrast nephropathy has to be differentiated from renal damage due to atheroembolic disease. J Nephrol 2012;25:282-289.
30.
Heverhagen JT, Zielke A, Ishaque N, Bohrer T, El-Sheik M, Klose KJ: Acute colonic diverticulitis: visualization in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:1275-1277.
31.
Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ, Vrouenraets BC, Gratama JW, Spilt A, et al: Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 2013;268:135-143.
32.
Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Bipat S: Acute appendicitis on abdominal MR images: training readers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2012;264:455-463.
33.
Sözüer EM, Bedirli A, Ulusal M, Kayhan E, Yilmaz Z: Laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000;10:203-207.
34.
Decadt B, Sussman L, Lewis MP, Secker A, Cohen L, Rogers C, et al: Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 1999;86:1383-1386.
35.
Al-Mulhim AS, Nasser MA, Abdullah MM, Ali AM, Kaman L: Emergency laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:599-602.
36.
Navez B, d'Udekem Y, Cambier E, Richir C, de Pierpont B, Guiot P: Laparoscopy for management of nontraumatic acute abdomen. World J Surg 1995;19:382-386; discussion 387.
37.
Karamanakos SN, Sdralis E, Panagiotopoulos S, Kehagias I: Laparoscopy in the emergency setting: a retrospective review of 540 patients with acute abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20:119-124.
38.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, et al: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296-327.
39.
Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al: Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1589-1596.
40.
Attard AR, Corlett MJ, Kidner NJ, Leslie AP, Fraser IA: Safety of early pain relief for acute abdominal pain. BMJ 1992;305:554-556.
41.
Gallagher EJ, Esses D, Lee C, Lahn M, Bijur P: Randomized clinical trial of morphine in acute abdominal pain. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:150-160.
42.
LoVecchio F, Oster N, Sturmann K, et al: The use of analgesics in patients with acute abdominal pain. J Emerg 1997;15:775-779.
43.
Pace S, Burke TF: Intravenous morphine for early pain relief in patients with acute abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1086-1092.
44.
Thomas SH, Silen W: Effect on diagnostic efficiency of analgesia for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Br J Surg 2003;90:5-9.
45.
Mahadevan M, Graff L: Prospective randomized study of analgesic use for ED patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:753-756.
46.
Vermeulen B, Morabia A, Unger PF, Goehring C, Grangier C, Skljarov I, et al: Acute appendicitis: influence of early pain relief on the accuracy of clinical and US findings in the decision to operate - a randomized trial. Radiology 1999;210:639-643.
47.
Marinsek M, Kovacic D, Versnik D, Parasuh M, Golez S, Podbregar M: Analgesic treatment and predictors of satisfaction with analgesia in patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain. Eur J Pain 2007;11:773-778.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.