Background: Choledocholithiasis is traditionally managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or T-tube insertion following common bile duct exploration. This study examined the efficacy and safety of primary duct closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) via choledochotomy. Methods: Between September 2011 and September 2013, 157 consecutive patients underwent LCBDE via choledochotomy. Results: Of 157 LCBDE procedures, 138 (87.9%) were successfully completed with primary closure of the choledochotomy. Eight patients (5.1%) underwent closure with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy and 11 patients (7.0%) were converted to open surgery. The biliary tree was free of stones at the end of surgery in 154 patients (98.1%). Postoperative bile leak occurred in 6 patients (3.8%). The median follow-up period was 18 (2-33) months, with no evidence of further bile duct stones or bile duct stricture in any patients. Univariable analysis revealed that successful duct clearance (p = 0.010) and diameter of the common bile duct (p < 0.001) were two significant risk factors for bile leak. Conclusions: Primary duct closure following LCBDE is effective and safe for the management of choledocholithiasis. The postoperative bile leak rate may be low in skilled laparoscopic surgeons with a careful selection of patients.

Keywords:
Primary closure, Laparoscopic choledochotomy, Choledocholithiasis
1.
Hungness ES, Soper NJ: Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:612-619.
2.
Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K: Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 2000;66:262-268.
3.
Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M; British Society of Gastroenterology: Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008;57:1004-1021.
4.
Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW: Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 2010;145:28-33.
5.
Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M: A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1986-1989.
6.
Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M: A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:713-720.
7.
Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Lin YX, Wu SJ, Cheng NS: Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:3156-3166.
8.
Lauter DM, Froines EJ: Laparoscopic common duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg 2000;179:372-374.
9.
Chiarugi M, Galatioto C, Decanini L, Puglisi A, Lippolis P, Bagnato C, Panicucci S, Pelosini M, Iacconi P, Seccia M: Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 2012;26:124-129.
10.
Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH: Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1552-1556.
11.
Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K: Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 1998;12:16-22.
12.
Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O'Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G: Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 1998;228:29-34.
13.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
14.
Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein AR, Daykhovsky L, Fallas MJ: Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 1993;17:22-28.
15.
Petelin JB: Clinical results of common bile duct exploration. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993;1:125-129.
16.
Gharaibeh KI, Heiss HA: Biliary leakage following T-tube removal. Int Surg 2000;85:57-63.
17.
Cai H, Sun D, Sun Y, Bai J, Zhao H, Miao Y: Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy. World J Surg 2012;36:164-170.
18.
El-Geidie AA: Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy? J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:844-888.
19.
Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H: A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1595-1600.
20.
Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD: Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 2009;157:e1-e5.
21.
Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR: T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;6:CD005641.
22.
ElGeidie AA, ElShobary MM, Naeem YM: Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Dig Surg 2011;28:424-431.
23.
Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D'Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Lezoche E: Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2005;19:705-709.
24.
Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C, Kalia A, Ammori BJ: Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2013;27:4164-4170.
25.
Waage A, Strömberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Arvidsson D: Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1181-1185.
26.
Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ: Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:492-494.
27.
Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A: One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 2003;17:12-18.
28.
Alhamdani A, Mahmud S, Jameel M, Baker A: Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2190-2195.
29.
Gholipour C, Shalchi RA, Abassi M: Efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as primary procedure in acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007;17:634-638.
30.
Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL: Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:29-35.
31.
Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Tutal F, Guven H, Ozsoy A: Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 2013;206:457-463.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.