Factors related to outcome were investigated in a consecutive series of 201 gastric cancer patients identified by endoscopy from January 1973 to May 1984 in this institution. Five-year survival rates were found to correlate significantly with tumor stage, lymph node spread, and also with disease localization. Tumors in the distal or middle third of the stomach were associated with a significantly better outcome than tumors in the upper third, extensive tumors or tumors after previous gastric resections. The choice of operative procedures was likewise related to outcome. Patients who had undergone curative resections had by far the best prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 44%, but this was primarily taken to represent a reflection of a less advanced disease stage rather than an independent prognostic factor. The histologic tumor type did not influence outcome in this series. We confirmed earlier observations that a long history of symptoms cannot be taken as a poor prognostic sign. A more liberal approach to upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in patients with unexplained abdominal pain or weight loss should contribute to improve the prognosis. Thus education of patients and primary care physicians rather than diagnostic or therapeutic modalities represent at present a major clinical concern in gastric cancer disease.

Keywords:
Gastric carcinoma, Gastric surgery, Endoscopy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel
1986
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.