Aim: To identify predictors of postoperative ascites after liver resection for patients with or without preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Patients undergoing PVE prior to hepatectomy (PVE group; n = 37) were compared with patients who underwent liver resection without PVE (n = 503). Ascites was defined as postoperative daily drainage of clear ascitic fluid exceeding 200 ml/day. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were retrospectively analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: Postoperative ascites was present in 13.5% (5/37) of patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy, compared to 5.8% (29/503) in the group undergoing liver resection without PVE (p = 0.061). In all patients, cirrhosis (OR 54.505, p < 0.001), operation time (OR 1.004, p = 0.014), and the use of the Pringle maneuver (OR 2.336, p = 0.041) were independent risk predictors for ascites in multivariate analysis. In PVE patients, cirrhosis (OR 0.156, p < 0.001) was the only independent significant predictor of ascites after resection. In patients undergoing liver resection without PVE, independent risk factors with multivariate analysis were operation time (OR 1.005, = 0.001) and cirrhosis (OR 26.609, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Operation time and the use of the Pringle maneuver were significant predictors of ascites after hepatectomy. Cirrhosis was a significant risk factor associated with postoperative ascites.

Keywords:
Ascites, Liver resection, Portal vein embolization, Predictors
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.