Background/Aim: The management of esophageal perforations remains controversial in large part due to variability in etiology, time of presentation, location, and underlying esophageal disease. We reviewed our experience in treating patients with esophageal perforations and evaluated the etiology, management and outcome of intervention in a tertiary center. Methods: Between 1999 and 2007, 48 patients with esophageal perforation were treated in a tertiary referral center in southern India. Postdilatation corrosive stricture perforations constituted the major etiology. Results: Thirty (62.5%) patients were diagnosed early (<24 h) and the remaining 18 (37.5%) were late (>24 h). The 30-day mortality was 6.2%, and mean hospital stay was 13 ± 9.3 days. Comparing outcomes between early and late groups, statistically significant difference was observed, with increased mortality (p = 0.02) and hospital stay (p = 0.04) following late diagnosis. Conclusion: This report suggests that early diagnosis decreases mortality and hospital stay in esophageal perforation. Preservation of esophagus may be attempted while treating esophageal perforations.

1.
Sealy WC: Rupture of the esophagus. Am J Surg 1963;105:505–510.
2.
Attar S, Hankins JR, Suter CM: Esophageal perforation: a therapeutic challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:45–51.
3.
Michel L, Grillo HC, Malt RA: Operative and non-operative management of esophageal perforation. Ann Surg 1981;194:57–63.
4.
Richardson DJ: Management of esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment. Am J Surg 2005;190:161–165.
5.
Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A: Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations – is it justified? Ann Surg 1997;225:415–421.
6.
Vogel SB, Rout RW, Martin TD: Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 2005;241:1016–1023.
7.
Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A: The role of esophagectomy in the management of esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1433–1436.
8.
Bufkin BL, Miller JL, Mansour KA: Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1447–1451.
9.
Urschel HC Jr, Razzuk MA, Wood RE: Improved management of esophageal perforation: exclusion and diversion in continuity. Ann Surg 1974;179:587–591.
10.
Chou YP, Changchien CS, Chuah SK: Risk factors for mortality of esophageal perforation: a clinical experience in 32 cases. J Intern Med Taiwan 2002;13:256–262.
11.
Reeder LB, DeFilippi VJ, Ferguson MK: The current results of therapy for esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 1995;169:615–617.
12.
Shaleen A, Sadiq S, Ashok K: Surgical management of corrosive strictures of stomach. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;23:178–180.
13.
Pass LJ, Lenarz LA, Schreiber T: Management of esophageal gunshot wounds. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:253–256.
14.
White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S: Esophageal perforations: CT findings. AJR 1993;160:767–770.
15.
De Lutio Di Castel Guidone E, Pinto A, Merola S: Role of spiral and multislice computed tomography in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous esophageal perforation: our experience. Radiol Med 2005;109:252–259.
16.
Rubesin SE, Levine MS: Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforations. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:1095–1115.
17.
Gupta NM, Kaman L: Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 2004;187:58–63.
18.
Linden PA, Bueno R, Mentzer SJ: Modified T-tube repair of delayed esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1129–1133.
19.
Cameron JL, Kieffer RF: Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;27:404–408.
20.
Moghissi K, Pender D: Instrumental perforations of the esophagus and their management. Thorax 1988;43:642–646.
21.
Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ: Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1088–1089.
22.
Iannettoni MD, Vlessis AA, Whyte RI: Functional outcome after treatment of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1606–1610.
23.
Gupta NM, Gupta R: Transhiatal esophageal resection for corrosive injury. Ann Surg 2004;239:359–363.
24.
Vimalraj V, Rajendran S, Jyotibasu D, Balachandar TG, Kannan D, Jeswanth S, Ravichandran P, Surendran R: Role of retrograde dilatation in the management of pharyngo-esophageal corrosive strictures. Dis Esophagus 2007;20:328–332.
25.
Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chang JP: One-stage operation for treatment after delayed diagnosis of thoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:617–620.
26.
Orringer MB, Stirling MC: Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:35–43.
27.
Sinha KN: Foley catheter self dilatation for strictures of the upper end of oesophagus. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 1996;38:91–93.
28.
Paramesh V, Rumisek JD, Chang FC: Spontaneous recanalization of the esophagus after exclusion using nonabsorbable staples. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1214–1216.
29.
Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Klein AS: Treatment of instrumental perforation of esophageal malignancy by transhiatal esophagectomy: Arch Surg 1988;123:1016–1018.
30.
Pass LJ, LeNarz LA, Schreiber JT: Management of esophageal gunshot wounds. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:253–256.
31.
Kiev J, Amendola M, Bouhaidar D, et al: A management algorithm for esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 2007;194:103–106.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.