Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the practice of performing intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a busy teaching hospital. Methods: Data were obtained from a surgical database for patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2000 and December 2003. The findings of IOC and follow-up were analysed. Results: 1,651 patients were included in the study. Of the 745 patients (45.1%) who underwent IOC, this was normal in 586 patients and abnormal in 68 patients. Of these 68 patients, 4 underwent immediate conversion to open common bile duct exploration. 33 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 31 patients were observed. During a median follow-up period of 920 days (range 371–1,821), 5 of the 745 patients had retained stones. Two patients re-presented after a failed IOC while 5 of the 906 patients from the non-cholangiogram group returned with stones. Of the 1,651 patients, definite stones were identified in 1.5% patients. Conclusion: When the surgeon deemed that IOC was not required, very few subsequent problems were encountered. An observational policy with monitoring of the liver function tests may be appropriate to avoid unnecessary invasive interventions in patients with an abnormal IOC.

Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Intraoperative cholangiography, Retained stones
1.
Mirizzi PL: Calculi of the common bile duct (520 cases under the control of surgical cholangiography) (in French). Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1955;81:834–841.
2.
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Nathanson LK, Pietrabissa A: Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs. selective policy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:302–305.
3.
Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR: Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2,043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case for the selective operative cholangiogram. Surg Endosc 2001;15:14–20.
4.
Sabharwal AJ, Minford EJ, Marson LP, Muir IM, Hill D, Auld CD: Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1998;85:624–626.
5.
Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T: Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289:1639–1644.
6.
Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A: Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 1999;229:449–457.
7.
Yip AW, Ng WS, Chow WC, Choi TK, Lam KH: Plea for selective operative cholangiography. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1991;36:21–24.
8.
Tranter SE, Thompson MH: Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:174–177.
9.
Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM: Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:188–192.
10.
Schmitt CM, Baillie J, Cotton PB: ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and effective way to manage CBD stones and complications. HPB Surg 1995;8:187–192.
11.
Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM, Hawes RH, Cotton PB: Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Surg Endosc 2006;20:801–805.
12.
Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H: Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 1990;211:60–62.
13.
Soper NJ, Brunt LM: The case for routine operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:953–959.
14.
Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ: Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004;187:475–481.
15.
Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC: A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004;239:28–33.
16.
Freeman ML: Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2002;2:147–168.
17.
Ammori BJ, Birbas K, Davides D, Vezakis A, Larvin M, McMahon MJ: Routine vs. ‘on demand’ postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography. Clinical evaluation and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1123–1126.
18.
Kelly TR: Gallstone pancreatitis: the timing of surgery. Surgery 1980;88:345–350.
19.
Connor S, Garden OJ: Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006;93:158–168.
20.
Wright KD, Wellwood JM: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1998;85:191–194.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.